DNAPLS, Optimization, Asymptotic Behaviour, Pump & Treat (Dump), soil samples only 5.9" deep on the Stroh property, elevated Method Detection Limits (MDL) are all examples of these excuses, lies and junk science. One more needs to be added to the list. That is the mournful, soulful whine of the harshly criticized professional liar. "Oh if only you had treated us with the respect we deserve we would have a) done the job properly in the first place b) talked to you respectfully and at the very least acknowledged your legitimate concerns c) made substantive amendments and changes to satisfy your legitimate concerns."
Professional liars have one playbook and it is very simple. If one lie works then ten lies to back it up are just dandy. Hence just like a professional spy, actor, politician you never break cover. You never break character. If you are a soft spoken, calm liar then even under pressure you maintain that facade. The credibility of your lies depends upon it. Also factual compromises are dangerous. If you admit to any flaws or errors in your methodology then you open the door to further questions and criticisms. Far better to slam the door immediately even if your lies are weak.
Recently a presumed, well educated citizen has come to the defence of QPs (Qualified Pe****s) and alleged other experts whom I have dealt with verbally harshly. This presumed, well educated person actually defended their right to NOT respond to my May 14/24 Delegation to Woolwich Council. This Delegation was a serious, technical critique of Joe Ricker's (WSP) "asymptotic behaviour" nonsense that TRAC members have appeared twice now to accept at face value. This would be at the initial TRAC meeting of April 25/24 followed by the next TRAC meeting of June 13/24 when they failed to ask questions, make comments or even acknowledge the legitimate concerns expressed by myself. Just as they have done for the last nearly nine years they have refused to discuss or debate any and all written Delegations I have made to them. They have by their actions expressed their contempt for me, CPAC and all members of the public.
This behaviour by an alleged "citizens" committee is unacceptable however it jives perfectly well with the behaviours of Uniroyal Chemical, Crompton, Chemtura and Lanxess all of whom refuse to discuss, debate or negotiate in good faith with independent, unbiased citizens whom Woolwich Council prefer not to hear from. Any disagreement from anyone is verboten to them unless worded incredibly softly and sweetly. Deference to authority is first and foremost. Deference to truth is merely a joke to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment