EVEN MORE DNAPLS FOUND IN WATERLOO REGION DRINKING WATER WELLS

 

This would be the long contaminated Parkway Wellfield located near Fairway Rd. and Manitou Dr. There are three wells there named K31, K32 and K33. Allegedly the DNAPL chemical (TCE) is found in only one of the wells namely K32. That does not make much sense to me as they are all located close together and what is one should certainly be drawn into the others. Further examination has shed some light on this anomaly. In fact TCE (trichloroethylene) has been detected in all three wells however the text in the July 29, 2025 Grand River Source Protection Area  Assessment Report states " Trichloroethylene is generally not detected (< 0.5 ug/l) at wells K31 and K33". In fact it is detected regularly at low levels and occasionally especially in K33 at higher levels. 

Other health problems include sodium and chloride concentrations being too high. While some of this may be due to road salt it is also common for higher chloride levels in solvent contaminated groundwaters especially chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater. 

TCE (trichloroethylene) is highly toxic. It both kills and causes extreme health effects from neurological symptoms to various cancers including leukemia. This solvent once was commonly used and abused throughout Waterloo Region industries as a degreaser for metal parts. Workers suffered the brunt of the health damages although the Bishop St. community in Cambridge suffered greatly from Northstar Aerospace mishandling of it as well as at least one other company across the road from Northstar.

Waterloo Region advises in this same Grand River Protection Area report that "...the source of the TCE to well K32 is unknown." I believe that that statement is false as my understanding for years is that there was formerly an Electrohome site also known as Deilcraft located nearby. Also oddly I recollect years after the fact a remediation attempt being done to clean up TCE from that industrial site. Obviously they didn't get all the TCE DNAPL which is unsurprising considering how DNAPL can disperse in the subsurface. The proof of course all these decades later is the dissolved TCE still in the groundwater. Take note Elmira with your ongoing chlorobenzene (DNAPL) contamination.

Happy drinking when this contaminated wellfield rejoins its' fellow retreaded wells into the drinking water regimen. Hey folks we have to keep our well healed developers, builders and politicians happy and if it requires personal sacrifice, so be it. 

WHY DO OUR GOVERNMENTS LIE TO US SO CONSTANTLY?

 

There are many reasons. Contempt and disrespect are right up there. Politicians were once ordinary people just generally a little lazier and a little more bent. This of course is a significant generalization as you will find occasional doctors and lawyers sitting in both provincial and federal governments. Both had to have money and ambition presumably along with hard work to get their degrees etc. Of course you will also get golf pros, their sons, drug dealers and all the rest sitting as M.P.s and M.P.P.s. Hence many of the lazy, unprepared for honest work politicians see others just like themselves sitting in legislatures and parliaments as well as on municipal councils and realize that citizens themselves are lazy enough and dumb enough to vote in riff raff. Hard to respect the public based upon the choices they make to represent themselves in government.

The public are occupied with keeping their jobs and hence salaries and wages. Non union work especially requires constant vigilance and watching which way the wind is blowing. More jobs are lost due to personality clashes than to inability to do the job. Citizens know that constantly toeing the line also means in non work matters and opinions that do not match your supervisor's or bosses. Political complacency by the public results from feeling detached from all decisions and having zero say in them. Again expressing strong political opinions at work can eventually lead to your head on the chopping block albeit employers are smart enough to dredge up some kind of pathetic work related excuse prior to dropping the axe. 

Politicians have learned that voters have short memories and long loyalties. Most first time voters follow their parents footsteps. Voters only vote about every four years and in between it's all about keeping their jobs , raising families and if they are fortunate at today's prices, buying homes. Then there are school issues, bills, social lives and so many important, in your face matters on a daily basis.

Politicians do learn on the job. They learn how to lie via using weasel words and phrases that allow them to backtrack when necessary.  Phrases like "when necessary" or "under the circumstances" gives them an out when their statements become ridiculous down the road. Quoting made up statistics that can never be checked such as "Canadians are fearful of gun violence" is a good example to justify whatever stupidity is the flavour of the day. Inventing crises is also a tool for ethically challenged politicians. So is using a legitimate crisis such as Tumblur Ridge in British Columbia. Odd how we learned that a disturbed individual committed firearms murders but we still have no knowledge as to why the authorities had returned those previously seized firearms to the family. Nor do we know if the "guilty" firearms used are on the government's banned list or not. All very strange how we the public are kept in the dark on important matters strongly related to current and ongoing highly criticized government initiatives and activities.     

Politicians are masters at deflecting appropriate criticism. That unfortunately is their greatest strength. 

GOOD NEWS & BAD NEWS : YES WE HAVE DNAPLS IN OUR ELMIRA BEDROCK AQUIFER BUT NOT TO WORRY BECAUSE SO DOES WATERLOO AND CAMBRIDGE

Isn't that great! Here we are already having the precedent of long term DNAPLS (TCE) in our drinking water aquifers hence we should be able to live with them up here in Dogpatch (Elmira) just as folks have for many decades in Waterloo and Cambridge. The ones in Waterloo are in the William St. Wellfield located at the corner of Regina St. and William St.. The Cambridge ones are at the very well known and most expensive ground water treatment location in Waterloo Region namely the Middleton Wellfield. This is located at the south end of Cambridge literally beside the Grand River. Despite a local hydrogeological consultant advising me that the source of the TCE there is NOT Canadian General Tower (CGT) perhaps a hundred metres away I am very skeptical. Yes there are dry cleaners also in the vicinity however so maybe they contributed or not.

Other good news is this. TCE or trichloroethylene is much more toxic than the chlorobenzene that we have here in Elmira courtesy of Uniroyal Chemical and maybe others. So if the good folks in Cambridge especially can both breathe TCE in the Bishop St. community and drink a little from their taps and not die immediately then we are looking good! 

The sources in Waterloo may include Canbar and Sunar and even possibly the old Seagram's plant but keep in mind our authorities truly enjoy muddying those waters and not being forthcoming.  The proof of course is the long term and ongoing detections of TCE in those drinking wells over a period of decades. Normally dissolved TCE should have all been pumped out by now but that is the joy and excitement of DNAPLS. They can exist in the subsurface, most especially in fractured Bedrock, sometimes for centuries and only very slowly dissolve into the groundwater and get pumped to surface. Now of course our chlorobenzene has been with us here in Elmira, just like NDMA, for far more than the 36 or 37 years since it was allegedly discovered in November 1989. 

If it is still in our groundwater, even in low concentrations, in ten or twenty more years then I think even the most professional liars are going to be looking for a hole to crawl into. But hey by then the few remaining honest and knowledgeable citizens should be long gone.  Liars are mostly simply buying time for themselves.  

THE APTLY NAMED STRANGE ST. WELLFIELD

 

It's the deception that gets to me. It's the ingenuous choice of wording. It's the never ending gilding of the lily in order to hide ugly truths. That's what I don't like about our regional government. This deception may partially be in order to protect the guilty. It may be in order to protect the names and reputations of so called "captains" of industry and or persons who built factories and provided jobs in Kitchener-Waterloo. However it's also about protecting their own butts. Some of these politicians have been around for decades and they literally have blood on their hands from decisions they've made and decisions they've avoided. 

Anybody remember the Uniroyal Tire plant on Strange St. for decades? How many know the long and toxic list of airborne contaminants that employees there worked in, some for decades? How many know the battles some of those employees fought to get pis* as* compensation from our provincial government's Workman's Compensation Board (WCB) later renamed to something more politically correct?   

Toxins included benzene, toluene, xylenes, chlorinated solvents and a plethora of other petroleum and rubber related toxins. These toxins don't just exist as air borne contaminants. If they leak, if they are mishandled, if they are negligently stored and most especially if they are buried on site they can and do migrate through the subsurface. Hence a nearby wellfield is the perfect way to introduce some of those same toxins that the Uniroyal workers were breathing, into the water supply. Many decades ago some BTEX chemicals (listed above) were found in low concentrations in some of the Strange St. wells. Who was the most likely contributor, Uniroyal or a nearby day care or school?

The initial Strange St. Wellfield consisted of wells K10A, K11, K13. This is an old wellfield. Current wells are named K10A, K11A, K13B, K18 and K19.  We are advised that well K13B is a direct replacement for well K13A completed in 2023. Oddly both K13B and K11A appear on the maps provided in the Grand River Source Protection Area reports as further west than the original wellfield. We are not told that wells K10A, K11 and K13 were still pumping and producing water for consumption until the very early 2000s. K18 and K19 on the other hand did not appear to be contributing to the drinking water supply until 2006 several years later. Also oddly they are located even further away (westwards) from the original wellfield than K11A and K13B.  Now I do have a memory of reading years ago that several of the Strange St. wells had been closed down and replaced with wells either slightly north or mostly west of their original location. 

Nobody apparently wants to point fingers or besmirch corporate heroes hence it seems to me that instead citizens drank contaminated water for years (just like in Elmira) while regional bureaucrats and politicians decided how best not to identify contaminated wells while either relocating them, shutting them down, or "managing" their pumping rates so as to stop pumping as the plumes approach the wells. 

When asked why our cancer rates keep rising I advise that it is the air we breathe, the food we eat and the water we drink. As soon as you stop doing that you stop feeding your body carcinogens. 

 

THE LANCASTER ST. WELLFIELD - A HISTORY OF LOW WAGES, HIGH PROFITS AND HIGH ENVIRONMENTAL & HEALTH DAMAGES

 

Many of the longtime nearby residents don't remember the "good old days".  The stench of acrid, acidic fumes leaving the site. The generally modest albeit well built homes nearby on Edwin St., Loiusa St., St. Leger etc. A company called Pannill Veneer operated on the site for decades before it closed down. Prior to Panill Veneer however was the Breithaupt Tannery. Solvents, acids and heavy metals were common and well recognized from the tannery industry. It operated approximately from the 1880s until about 1950 before shutting down. There were other tanneries in Kitchener-Waterloo and they too made a mess and left the mess for others to clean up. These industries like so many others were protected by the politicians that they helped to get elected. These same politicians minimized the negative environmental and health effects of these companies both on employees and residents while they were operating and making money as well as after they cut and ran. This is what politicians do especially if they hope to have the funds to get re-elected.

The very same politicians and their successors allowed all the anti social aspects of these heavy, stinking and loud industries, often situated beside residential areas, without proper safeguards or even reasonable mitigating efforts. Then when they packed up and departed little to no effort was made to hold them accountable to clean up the mess they left behind. These were very unhealthy messes combined with high costs to clean them up. Politicians did what they always do. They lied like dogs and passed the costs on to the public taxpayers as much as possible. The Breithaupt Tannery $ 9 million cleanup was the most expensive in Kitchener's history. It was funded by the City of Kitchener (taxpayers), The Region of Waterloo (taxpayers) and the developer (Queensgate Dev't.) who by the way complained that the Province of Ontario (taxpayers) failed to chip in.  Three levels of taxpayers but all out of the same pockets.

Never any health studies, never any environmental studies until after a developer decided they could make money on the site. Breithaupt Tannery did not just mess up people's health through noise and air emissions. They also contaminated the nearby Lancaster Wellfield which supplied water to Kitchener citizens. How many of them died prematurely and or with compromised health issues while the bast**d politicians and industrialists laughed all the way to the bank? 

The nearby Lancaster Wellfield has been shut down now for a very long time. Do you think they shut it down the day the Tannery closed? Did they shut it down before the toxic contaminants reached the drinking wells? Meanwhile Waterloo Region are recommissioning other shut down, contaminated wells so why not these? Allegedly there has been a major cleanup. Or was it? Regardless if we are so desperate for water the Region can reopen these wells with or without an Environmental Assessment. Just like local industry in Elmira and K-W,  Waterloo Region knows that Environmental Assessments are easy to "fix". Afterall it's politicians who write the legislation, warts and loopholes and all.

DNAPLS - THE VERBOTEN WORD FOR LANXESS & THEIR CORRUPT "REGULATOR" THE MECP

 

A little bit of irony here. The stupid twits invent a weird pretend scientific test to prove one thing and actually prove the very last thing they intended which is that there both have been and are free phase and residual DNAPL in the Municipal Upper and Lower Aquifers beneath the town of Elmira. Keep in mind how late in the game the dirty polluter and their fellow travellors decided that the high concentrations of both NDMA and chlorobenzene needed further efforts. Not back in 1998 when the off-site groundwater pumping began but many years later they added pumping wells W8 and W9 to address specific problems on the east and west sides of Union St. not very far from Park Ave. The east side of the street was actually at the edge of the Yara (Nutrite) property and the pumping well went right down to the Municipal Lower Aquifer. High chlorobenzene concentrations were embarrassing and needed to be reduced in order to continue the DNAPL coverup which said that free phase DNAPLS had never left the Uniroyal Chemical site. The W9 pumping well also went right through to the Municipal Lower Aquifer and in fact its' well screen rested on the surface of the exposed Bedrock Aquifer.  There is no LAT (Lower Aquitard) located here thus providing a direct route for contamination. Yes this is one of the main routes that has contaminated the Bedrock Aquifer with both NDMA, chlorobenzene and everything else despite the professional liars on behalf of Lanxess Canada/Uniroyal Chemical saying otherwise.

Table 2 (CH38A  ML aquifer) gives us our first hint. This observation well located by Industrial Dr. and Oriole Parkway (Sanyo Canada right there) reacted strongly to the cessation of pumping at W3R almost two hundred metres southwards. From Non-Detect for chlorobenzene on June 25/26 before pumping stopped, it in a few days jumped to 40 and later 45 ppb. after pumping was stopped at W3R. After pumping was restarted concentrations of chlorobenzene fell to Non-Detect again. This is due to likely residual DNAPL left over from the years long heavy pumping at W4 further north and a little east of CH38 and had caused unusually high concentrations of chlorobenzene at that well for decades. W4 beside the Howard St. Water Tower and observation well OW57-32R was the location of free phase DNAPL 100 feet below ground surface originally confirmed and then denied by CRA, Uniroyal and the M.O.E..

Table 2 (OW119-27  MU aquifer) tells a somewhat similar story. Prior to pumping being stopped this well three metres north of pumping well W3R had a concentration of 68.1 ppb. of chlorobenzene and within a few days of the cessation of pumping it was at 30.7 ppb. dropping down to .98 (yes less than 1) ppb over the shutdown weeks and then jumping back up to 83.3 ppb. after pumping at W3R was restored. Clearly the core of the chlorobenzene plume has been drawn towards W3R by its' pumping and then drifts away when pumping stops. The ongoing chlorobenzene concentrations up to the drinking standard criteria of 80 ppb. after nearly thirty years of pumping are the obvious and clear  result of subsurface residual or free phase DNAPL presence which dissolves very much more slowly in water than NDMA and most other solvents. 

Table 2 (OW155-32  ML aquifer)  This observation well is located about five metres north of pumping well W5A and had a chlorobenzene concentration of Non-Detect prior to the shutdown of pumping. Within a few days its' concentration had jumped to 135 ppb. It stayed above the drinking water standard throughout the pump shutdown period and then somewhat oddly remained high (151 ppb) even more than two months after pumping restarted at W5A. I see two possibilities here. This pumping well is very close to the south-west corner of the Uniroyal/Lanxess site and either free phase or residual DNAPL  exists very nearby or since pumping well W4 to the west (Water Tower area) was shut down several years ago the remaining contaminant plume has via W5A pumping migrated eastwards towards  itself (i.e. W5A). Either way this again is the second area where DNAPL left the Uniroyal site decades ago and has permanently contaminated the Elmira Aquifers (including Bedrock).

Lastly we have Table 2 (CH44D  ML aquifer)  Here we have a monitoring well twenty metres north of pumping well W8. I guess I may have saved the best for last. Its' concentration prior to the cessation of pumping was 4.56 ppb (parts per billion). Within a few days of pumping being stopped the chlorobenzene concentration had soared to 703 ppb. !!!  It remained high throughout the shutdown period exceeding 1,000 ppb. on two occasions. Then in November two months after pumping restarted it was back down to 20.1 ppb. !!!  This tells me a couple of things. Firstly either residual or free phase DNAPL is present right there in the ML aquifer very close to W8 and CH44D and the volume of groundwater impacted is small leading to amazingly fast reactions to both stopping and restarting the pumping regime. Also based upon a similar reaction to pumping by NDMA I suspect that the NDMA may very well be mixed in with the DNAPL . 

What have I slowly learned over thirty-six years? Thin skinned and faint of heart individuals have a much higher tolerance for well dressed, well spoken liars, cheats and thieves than they do for those who would point out these character deficiencies and speak of them. Hence my apologies to the Jens, Sandys, Sebastians, Nathans and others who are far more impressed than I by the Ramin Ansaris, Allan Deals, Lou Almeidas, Steve Quigleys, Hadley Stamms, Lubnas, Jasons, and so many more. While I don't share your character priorities I try to understand them despite occasionally finding them grating. Also the term "cheats and thieves" may be interpreted as more figurative than literal.    

  

"GHD HAVE PRODUCED ANOTHER REPORT FOR PUBLIC CORRUPTION" - A ONE WORD CHANGE FROM YESTERDAY'S BLOG POSTING'S FIRST SENTENCE

  

I replaced the word "consumption" with the word "corruption". Both are accurate. Basically TRAC just like previous iterations of Woolwich Council controlled CPAC and UPAC are out of their depth, corrupt bodies by intention. Their mandates are typical Dave Brenneman (CAO) BS. CAO stands for Chief Executive Officer and BS does not stand for Brotherhood of Sisters. Some of the TRAC members, especially the newer ones,  may believe the propaganda whereas it is difficult to believe that the longer  running TRAC (previously TAG) members don't know any better. Susan Bryant in particular has known what's been going on for decades and has enjoyed herself playing the game with the local bigshots, polluters, bureaucrats and politicians. 

Today I'm looking at the Figures and Tables presented in the extremely recent "Lanxess Canada Municipal Aquifer Steady State Conditions Trial Report".  As mentioned yesterday there actually is no steady state being examined. Not only is pumping well E7 doing its' thing at the south end of Elmira but the two Municipal Upper Aquifer wells are pumping at the north end on the Uniroyal/Lanxess site. Add to that the failure of pumping well W5A at the crucial moment and you've really got very little science going on. This report is recommending further similar tests down the road albeit of longer duration which is a very bad idea. Honest brokers doing experiments on contaminated aquifers is one thing but long term, client driven, for profit consultants is something entirely different. My and everybody else who are knowledgeable and honest (barely a handful locally) legitimately can suspect not only junk science and nonsensical conclusions but also no more than a financial holiday from pumping for Lanxess Canada.  

The Figures allegedly show groundwater elevation changes as well as some difference in flow direction during the shutdown and later startup of off-site pumping underneath parts of Elmira.  The Tables allegedly show groundwater contamination concentrations for numerous known Uniroyal Chemical contaminants over the course of the test. Except they don't! They show a grand total of seven monitoring well results including double counting the observation wells screened in both the Municipal Upper and Municipal Lower aquifers namely CH38, OW155 and then three others namely OW 119, OW175 and CH44D screened in one aquifer. That's it which hardly gives a full picture of the levels of contamination throughout Elmira's subsurface. 

Getting back to the number of contaminants tested there are allegedly sixteen VOCs and SVOCs (volatile organics/semi volatile organics) in total including NDMA and chlorobenzene. Even here the company cheaped out and worse by not  testing them on a weekly basis before, during and after the shutdown and startup as they did their favourite two namely NDMA and chlorobenzene. Unbelievably they tested the majority (14 of 16) just prior to the shutdown and then just prior to the restart of pumping. A couple of extra contaminants also got tested in November 2025 two to three months after the restart of off-site pumping. Despite less than surprising results at most of the specifically chosen well locations there were a few surprises of both higher and lower results than expected with NDMA and chlorobenzene. This is why all the listed Uniroyal contaminants should have been fully tested equally with NDMA and chlorobenzene. Of course doing so just might have surprised them particularly with the other (than chlorobenzene) four chlorinated solvents including chlorophenols, dichlorophenols and even perhaps non chlorinated aniline. 

This report is just one more in a long litany of self-serving, public relations tools by Uniroyal/Lanxess to build and maintain the facade that they and their fellow travellors are and have been doing everything possible to remediate the Elmira Aquifers. Unfortunately sweet talk, puffery, psuedo science and phony public consultation  does not clean aquifers. Good science, honest intentions and communication and money do.