ARE THE DISHONEST BUGGERS ACTUALLY THAT AFRAID OF ME? (OR ARE THEY AFRAID THAT THEIR ILLEGAL SWEETHEART DEAL WILL BE EXPOSED?)

 

Chemtura several years back as part of the untruthful claim that they were going to triple off-site pumping via adding more wells added wells W8, W9, W6A & W6B. They also shut down pumping well W4 beside the Howard St. Water Tower, likely prematurely, as diffused chlorobenzene from the DNAPL pool at the bottom of OW57-32R is still back diffusing into the aquifer there beside the Water Tower. Well W3 on Industrial Dr. was replaced by pumping well W3R beside it. W5A/B remained just off-site at the south end of the former Uniroyal Chemical and pumping well E7 way down at the south end of town has continued pumping although on an odd schedule in what they call "pulse" pumping. The new wells W6A & W6B along with W8 are pumping at extremely low rates for the purpose of containing and slowly removing off-site sources of chlorobenzene along with accompanying tinier amounts of NDMA. W6A and W6B are located at the south end of the former Borg Textile property along Oriole Parkway. Pumping wells W8 and W9 are both screened in the Municipal Lower Aquifer to the west off-site of Uniroyal/Lanxess where they intercept the known DNAPL that flowed over to the Nutrite/Yara site decades ago. W9 also pumps some NDMA whether from the former textile factory beside it or from Uniroyal Chemical.

So what is the big deal above and beyond Chemtura lying about tripling the volume of off-site pumping back in November 2012? Well it's about the Ontario MECP (Environment, Conservation & Parks) and Lanxess still lying about other sources of NDMA, chlorobenzene and more to the Elmira Aquifers. O.K. we get it! Uniroyal are bad! They took a sweetheart deal from the Ministry of Environment back in 1991 to accept full blame for all contamination in exchange for a lighter sentence (i.e. less cleanup particularly DNAPL $$$$$$$$$). 

Lanxess went so far as to finger some anonymous "other" sources of chlorobenzene along First St. a couple of years ago at a TRAC meeting in order to quell speculation about the "excess" 1,900 kg. of chlorobenzene discovered by Dr. Neil Thompson (U. of Waterloo) around 2018. Lanxess and the MECP were looking stupid after that denying my claims of other sources including Varnicolor Chemical, Borg Textile and westward gravity flowing chlorobenzene DNAPL from Uniroyal Chemical without providing an alternative for the "excess" 1,900 kg.. 

Apparently the last thing they ever want to do is give credit to a citizen scientist who has exposed the many lies that their inadequate and ineffective pump & treat remediation is based upon. They don't want to admit that I, Rich Clausi and Esther Thur were right in 1994 and since about DNAPLS. They don't want to admit  that the Ontario Ministry of Environment makes sweetheart deals with polluters, not in the public interest, but to avoid being exposed as incompetent or worse.  

 

POLITICALLY SPEAKING - THANK YOU JIM ZIEGLER & CARL ZEHR AND DARE I SAY DONALD TRUMP FOR SHOWING US THE WAY

 

I think you know where I'm going with this one. Any comparison with that old, senile and brain addled man to the south of us isn't going to be a happy comparison. Just in case you think I'm sexist or ageist let me reassure you that I am both male and old. O.K. I think Trump is 80 so he's got a few years on me but not much. Also to date I haven't been quoted as saying that I've grabbed random or strange members of either gender by their personal parts. Similarly I've never been known to brag about walking into ladies locker rooms or changing areas in order to check them out. Sadly I guess I'm just not Presidential material.

Then we have former Kitchener alderman Jim Ziegler. Now there might be a case to be made that he's actually an example of a Canadian man in his mid 70s or so but that he's actually got the libido and stamina of a man decades younger. Afterall he not only tried to woo a lady justice of the peace in her office but to prove his endurance and tenacity he stayed on his feet and kept sweet talking her after she said no for another 35 or 40 minutes. Talk about persistence and commitment to the goal at hand. Now that's a real politician still pretty much in the prime of his life.

Then we have Carl Zehr. Oh no you say. It can't be true. Isn't Carl Zehr Square in front of Kitchener City Hall named after him? Doesn't that prove that he's a real good fella? Just like the Kennedy-Trump Centre in the U.S. Just like Lake America and the Gulf of America and the Trump Airport doesn't the right to name stuff in your own image basically mean that you can almost walk on water? Finally as the ultimate proof we have Seiling Drive here in Woolwich Township, the birthplace of our almost revered former Regional Chair. Seiling Dr. is just north of Elmira (Arthur St./#21 ?)  You do know what's on the right side at the end of that road don't you? It's the Woolwich Landfill aka "Dump". 

Hmm that all gives pause for thought. Can I actually find fault with Carl? Well in my opinion and the opinions of others not named Shantz (Sandy), Hahn (Scott) or Bauman (Mark) the answer is yes. Carl came north here to Dogpatch (Woolwich Twn.) and inflicted his good name on the citizenry regarding MECAC which is the Municipal Election Compliance  Audit Committee. Carl similar to his colleagues could find little fault with Sandy's peculiar and amateurish bookeeping regarding her municipal election Financial Statements. I suspect that possibly calling her incompetent was the lesser of two evils in that the alternative was that she knowingly and intentionally lied about her election finances. Touchingly that may have been done out of embarrassment that she had spent triple on her mayoral campaign than her three opponents combined.

So where am I going with all this? Basically at my advanced age I've never been elected to any public post although I tried twice in 1996 and 1999 to be a trustee on the essentially disgusting and corrupt Waterloo Region District School Board (WRDSB). That description just used is held by many since the WRDSB's exposure to public condemnation over both the Caroline Burjowski  affair/defeat and the bullying of trustee Mike Ramsay. I guess I'm suggesting that a far too large a percentage of our politicians are lying swindlers and scum bags. This is not a news flash to the well informed.  

A PIECE OF THE DNAPL COVERUP IN JANUARY 2007 AND EARLY 2008

 

SUSAN, PAT & SANDY LIE THEIR WAY INTO CHEMTURA's GOOD GRACES 

In January 2007 Pat Mclean, Chair of CPAC (Chemtura Public Advisory Committee), Susan Bryant and myself, both CPAC members, plus Wilf Ruland alleged independent hydrogeologist attended a meeting at the University of Waterloo with Dr. John Cherry and Dr. Beth Parker. The two doctors were world renowned hydrogeology experts and we were there to learn about DNAPLS (Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids). Wilf Ruland had studied hydrogeology under Dr. Cherry and was of the opinion that leaving DNAPLS in the ground was safer than removing them and possibly remobilizing them further. The four of us drove together and all were in good spirits with possibly some gentle persuasion aimed at myself suggesting that the two doctors knew their stuff and I should pay close attention. No other indications were made as to what they expected from the meeting.

Well both doctors were amazing and informative plus they handed out a set of multiple "briefs" or 8-10 page articles they had written and published  regarding DNAPL presence, effects, and possible remediation. These "briefs" were passed among the four of us and I was a little surprised albeit pleased when my three colleagues suggested that I keep them and read them first. I promised to do so quickly and get them back to Pat, Susan and Wilf who seemed a little non-committal. The doctors then advised the four of us that the old hydrogeological understanding about not disturbing sub-surface DNAPLS had been significantly altered over the decades. Currently the long term damage from DNAPLS was better understood and it was important when at all possible to deal with them via encapsulation, excavation or any other method which separated them from underground aquifers. 

 The return trip home was morgue like. I may even have asked jokingly "Who died?" I really did not understand exactly why the three of them were so despondent. Much, much later things became clearer. I admit that I was naive in the extreme. I really did not, even at that age, believe that people could be so deceptive and manipulative. Regardless I waited patiently for months for Pat (CPAC Chair) to put this incredibly important meeting on the CPAC Agenda. Nothing. I asked Susan as well what was going on. Nothing. Over the summer Pat started getting aggressive asking me if I were "challenging" her. I truly didn't know what the hell her problem was. In late August I wrote a strongly worded  DNAPL report criticizing Uniroyal/Chemtura's lack of DNAPL recognition and remediation. Nothing.

Probably in September the Ammonia Treatment System (ATS) was on the Agenda. As usual I was asked to read it carefully and report my comments to Susan Bryant which I did. I had found a couple of pretty gross errors in the Conestoga Rovers report in which they had picked an inappropriate monitoring well to determine if on-site hydraulic containment was being maintained during a pumping slowdown necessitated by the upcoming ATS work. The pumping well actually was by a "window" through the clay/silt aquitard allowing a direct connection between the Upper Aquifer (UA) and the Municipal Upper Aquifer (MU) . This issue would cause higher groundwater elevation readings from the well making it inappropriate to be used as part of a monitoring pair of wells determining hydraulic containment. Susan seemed taken aback and asked if I would share this information with Wilf Ruland (alleged independent hydrogeologist) to which I readily agreed. He came over to my home and I showed him the data and the stratigraphic Figures demonstrating my concerns. Oddly enough that while he was quite obviously taken aback by what I had found he did not want to commit himself by stating either yes or no to my discovery which I found strange at the time.

To Wilf's credit he did try at a later meeting with Conestoga Rovers (CRA) to convince them to use a different monitoring well.  Without any intelligent reason or rationale they said no and Wilf rolled over like the wimp he is when dealing with authority figures such as apparently CRA and the Ontario M.O.E. My friend and colleague Dr. Henry Regier was present at that meeting and was not impressed by either CRA or particularly Wilf. Susan and Pat supported CRA/Chemtura and to my shock launched an attack upon me suggesting that I was blocking progress of the ATS. Yes I had filed a request for a hearing to the Ontario Environmental Review Board (ERB) albeit I was assured that my review if granted would not inhibit or slow construction progress of the new ATS but merely look at their proposed monitoring well locations and determine if they were appropriate or not. Eventually many months later the ERT advised that indeed the well that I had suggested was inappropriate and should be replaced. This was after the ATS had been completed.

Meanwhile however  Pat and Susan through direct lying and manipulation had managed to get Woolwich Council to remove me from CPAC. That of course was AFTER they had already on their own non-existent authority kicked me off of CPAC. Councillor Ruby Weber intervened and said no way! It had to be a council decision because after all it was Pat Mclean and Susan Bryant back in 2000 who had dragged CPAC into being a committee of council in the first place. I soon learned how deep the disgusting behaviour went as Pat and Susan's complaint morphed from my allegedly inhibiting the building of the Ammonia Treatment System  (ATS) to my being "difficult" and rude to my fellow CPAC members. Well there I am at a private Woolwich council meeting attended by the councillors including first term councillor Sandy Shantz who also sat on CPAC. I figured this would be easy as I asked her in front of her council colleagues if it was accurate that yes I routinely, strongly criticized Chemtura and the Ontario Ministry of Environment but NEVER  ever criticized or disrespected my fellow voting citizen CPAC members. It was an easy and obvious YES answer and Sandy hummed and hawed and refused to commit one way or the other. At that point I took Sandy's measure and knew what she was. She was a lying, go along to get along gutless wonder and she clearly knew that Woolwich council had already decided to get rid of me for whatever reason. Naive as I was it still took me a  while to realize how imbedded Woolwich Council was with Uniroyal Chemical and their successors.   

I was bounced off of CPAC by Woolwich Council in the spring of 2008 but was back on CPAC with a new council by 2011. In 2014 Sandy became Mayor and I haven't been on CPAC or successors since 2015 and wouldn't want to be as I have lost my naivety and realized how corrupt Woolwich Councils have been and how useless that committee is intended to be. Susan and Pat have both moved out of town and Sandy's tenure is ending very shortly (Thank God for all three).

WOOLWICH TOWNSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES: A) DENY, DENY, DENY B) HIRE CLIENT DRIVEN CONSULTANTS C) FORM A COMMITTEE D) HIRE UNBIASED EXPERTS & PROFESSIONAL HELP

A) is of course the cheapest and least expensive. It is always the "GO TO" first response if a citizen or resident has an environmental concern or a complaint. Simply by waiting them out and as much as possible ignoring them you soon find out how serious they are and if they actually have done their homework on the issue.

B) This is both a long and short term solution. Get some company with a few credentials or degrees working for them who are prepared to do at least a tiny bit of background digging but more importantly speak confidently and boldly as if they are the absolute world's best in their fields of expertise. This would include Morrison & Beatty as well as Conestoga Rovers way back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. If they get caught red handed as Brian Beatty did taking out of context some quotes from hydrogeologist Stan Feenstra then simply "consolidate" them as David Ash of Uniroyal Chemical did. Move on to the next, CRA, and see how they do. 

Conestoga Rovers & Assoc. (CRA) did just fine to the point of also being hired by Woolwich Twn. to muddy oops I mean clarify issues around the serious methane problem at the former Bolender Landfill. Yes this is at the north end of Bolender Park where children play including at the splashpad. It was perhaps a little awkward hitting old organics (municipal waste including foodstuffs) while excavating but local residents had indicated that municipal waste was buried behind (west ) their homes earlier on. There had been an active methane gas system drawing out methane gas from the landfill and venting it to the air for years although it was often not working well. 

C) Form a committee. Give it zero power and authority other than moral suasion which rarely works on corporations. Put a few "names" on it and away you go, if necessary for years and decades. Pretending to fix a problem is the next best thing to doing nothing. 

D) Get serious now. This is a one way street into potentially expensive remediation or removal of buried wastes that also by the way include buried industrial wastes from a number of local industries including Uniroyal, Great West Felt, likely Varnicolor Chemical, maybe Borg and who knows how many others. 

With new technology such as that written about in yesterday's K-W Record titled "Waterloo researcher uses microbes to eat methane" which is being studied and researched at the University of Waterloo there are scientific ways to reduce risk and harm caused by explosive methane gas so close to residential homes nearby. All these homes have pilot lights on their gas furnaces, water heaters and other natural gas appliances. If uncontrolled methane enters via the sub-surface through basements or windows then there could be explosions and disasters. Loss of life and resulting culpability however will be mitigated by a Township hiding behind their choice of proven friendly consultants  i.e. B).     

NDMA IS ALSO BIODEGRADABLE JUST LIKE CHLOROBENZENE

 

Isn't it just a son of a gun when you learn basic facts and knowledge about your contaminated water supply 36 years after the event? Only in the town of Elmira in Woolwich Township where municipal and regional politicians instead of standing up for their citizens and constituents would rather back a provincial coverup between the Ministry of Environment, Liberal and Conservative governments and Uniroyal Chemical and successors. If as I've just learned that NDMA does degrade in a reasonable time frame in aerobic environments such as shallow soils and at a slower rate in anaerobic soils then how is it possible to still have it so far above drinking water standards 36 years later? Well!

First of all let me say this: going on 29 years of pump and treat maybe hasn't been doing all the heavy lifting. Likely natural attenuation via biodegradation in the sub-surface has done a lot of that and CRA/GHD/Lanxess are just taking the credit. Not that they would ever deceive us. Hell no!

There are a number of possible reasons why their efforts have been so ineffective despite a quarter century of false promises claiming guaranteed success by 2028. There are most likely other sources of NDMA besides Uniroyal Chemical. The two most likely are Varnicolor Chemical and Borg Textile conveniently right in the middle of the damn plume leaving the Uniroyal site. Sanyo Canada has also been on my radar for a long while albeit with less evidence than the other two long shut down companies. Also interference from the hundred or hundreds of other solvents and chemical compounds both Uniroyal and Varnicolor dumped, spilled and leaked into the natural environment may have slowed the biodegradation of NDMA.

Dissolved chlorobenzene degradation has been slowed down not only due to an excess of nearly 2,000 kg. of it above and beyond allegedly what Uniroyal contributed but also by the fact that being a DNAPL chemical, it dissolves into the groundwater very slowly. Despite that Lanxess are looking at a bioremediation method for chlorobenzene which may or may not produce results. One question I have is whether their recently proposed amendments to stimulate bacterial degradation will work for any other compounds in the groundwater. It does nothing for NDMA  however there is an emerging technology that promotes a particular sub-surface bacteria that breaks down NDMA. This emerging technology uses a compound that most likely will not assist bacteria to break down other sub-surface toxic compounds. 

My understanding is that the emerging NDMA technology needs to be used with caution. It can produce by-products for example such as ammonia which in aquifers already contaminated by ammonia is hardly ideal. Other problems include that its' efficacy can be reduced if the corporate jerks who contaminated the aquifers in the first place were so antisocial and environmentally unwise that they dumped/spilled/buried any and all types and kinds of toxins. In other words because of the variety and sheer volumes of so many contaminants this emerging technology might not work here in Elmira. 

Frankly I still think that Lanxess won't throw good money after bad and actually seriously look at all the poisons in our drinking water courtesy of our local corporate twits and decide to actually go after all of them including dioxins and DDT. It is so much simpler and easier to go through the motions and keep mostly local people attending meetings four or five times a year, chasing shadows.       

   

HERE IS THE REALITY OF ELMIRA'S GROUNDWATER & DOWNSTREAM CANAGAGIGUE CREEK

 

Dissolved concentrations in Elmira's groundwater of NDMA and chlorobenzene are as low right now as they've likely ever been since Uniroyal Chemical graced our town around 1942 and then destroyed our beautiful Creek and poisoned our parents and grandparents. That poisoning was via both air emissions and surface dumping. Dissolved NDMA and chlorobenzene can both be removed via pumping and treating of groundwater. It's the undissolved masses of those chemicals plus the hundred or more conveniently ignored others that is the real problem beneath Elmira. These masses are attached to soils within low permeable aquitards (clay & silt) and as the concentrations within nearby groundwater (sand & gravel aquifers) are reduced these masses slowly back diffuse from the aquitards into the aquifers. It has taken decades for these chemicals to initially diffuse into the aquitards and it will take decades more for them to fully back diffuse into the aquifers. That is part of the problem. Then we have both free phase and residual DNAPL which is an even larger problem. Some of the DNAPL (Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquid) came from Uniroyal Chemical, some from Varnicolor Chemical and the source of the long proven DNAPL but denied by Uniroyal/M.O.E. at OW57-32R (beside Howard St. Water Tower) until recently (2014), is unknown. It could be from Uniroyal, Varnicolor or even the former Borg Textiles across Howard Ave. from the former Varnicolor Chemical. 

To further complicate matters is the problem of DDT and dioxins. Perhaps PCBs are also a similar part of this problem. These are all known POPS or Persistent Organic Pollutants that are present in Elmira and the downstream Canagagigue Creek courtesy of Uniroyal Chemical mostly, with Varnicolor and other older local manufacturers on the hook for the PCBs. Generally speaking they have been totally ignored in our groundwater under Elmira whereas they have been tested for and found above all health criteria repeatedly downstream in the Canagagigue ("Gig"). They are all mobilized by solvents which both Uniroyal and Varnicolor had and grossly mismanaged for decades. They are also both dissolved and mobilized in free phase DNAPL which both companies had in spades. They are the elephants in the room which our corrupt Ministry of Environment (MECP) and Uniroyal/Lanxess  pretend do not dissolve in groundwater and hence can be ignored. In fact they do dissolve in groundwater at low concentrations which however do exceed the Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS). If they were totally incapable of existing within groundwater and drinking water then why does Ontario have drinking water standards for them?                             

The Canagagigue Creek right now likely has the lowest concentrations of dissolved solvents it has had also since 1942. It has a ton however of DDT, dioxins, PCBs and mercury. While not all of these are  directly due to Uniroyal Chemical; wildlife, fish, the benthic community and human beings have and continue to suffer health effects from them. They have been sampled, tested and talked to death without a single shovel full of them and other Uniroyal contaminants (PAHs) having been removed. However just as with Elmira's groundwater failures there is absolutely no shortage of excuses, magic bullets or other psuedo cleanup remedies suggested mostly to keep idle hands on Woolwich's tightly controlled and phony public consultation body TRAC busy. TRAC is all for public show as they don't have a clue as to what is important and what they should be doing and this is as intended by Woolwich, RMOW, MECP and Lanxess Canada.  

TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW CITIZENS GET CO-OPTED BY POLLUTERS

 

Firstly there probably is not a one size fits all methodology. There is of course a huge incentive for polluters to want to make friends with and cozy up to citizen leaders. Polluters want the appearance of being reasonable,  open to discussion and debate, professionals. Plain stupidity may swing some people over to the corporate ideology but I really don't believe that Susan Bryant is either stupid or a "true believer" in that sense despite her father's corporate background in Rochester with Kodak. I have for some years felt that she was simply motivated by ego, selfishness and status. Maybe that is too harsh although her behaviour is certainly sociopathic. Literally in decades of knowing her I've only seen her break character a couple of times. That requires tremendous focus and determination.

A more generous interpretation may be that her intelligence combined with her sociopathic tendencies promoted her ability to be ruthless. A true sociopath often is smarter than average and leverages that intelligence to get their way. A sociopath does not question their own behaviour as much as the rest of us do. A sociopath knows where they want to go and honest or decent people in their path must be removed by whatever means possible. Susan has behaved towards a couple of friends and colleagues including myself in an absolutely horrifying way. She did it without warning and without regret. Her behaviour was beyond ruthless and brutal. Frankly until I was on the receiving end I did not think it possible for anyone to so effectively and without remorse approach another person, feign friendship and then wait patiently for years to strike from behind. And not to ever feel bad, look sad, remorseful or guilty. And of course never to apologize even decades later. Why would she apologize if she is a true believer in getting what she wants literally by any means and at any cost?

Again maybe I'm being too understanding or gentle in my interpretation of the horrid things that she has done. Maybe in fact she is solely motivated by self importance and status. Yet she continues into her old age to stay involved albeit at a much less intense and energetic pace. She has long stated her desire to have the downstream Canagagigue Creek cleaned up. In my opinion she has sold the farm, given unnecessary concessions to the polluter and sold her own integrity all for promises from long time proven polluters and liars. Promises that to date and since the 1990s are nothing but corporate bull manure. How smart is that exactly? 

In fact I truly believe that Susan Bryant almost singlehandedly with the exception of two wing women (Sylvia Berg & Pat McLean) has been the major reason that Uniroyal Chemical and successors have succeeded in NOT cleaning our aquifers OR the downstream Canagagigue Creek. She has provided them with cover. She has provided them with the appearance of corporate entities who while reluctant to spend cleanup money at least are sitting down and honestly having decades of dialogue with citizens. Unfortunately just like Sebastian and Linda who are long term TRAC members all this does is give formerly Uniroyal and now Lanxess Canada credibility as if they are honestly looking either for a compromise or some sort of acceptable cleanup solution. In fact the companies have been running out the clock for decades now. Talk is cheap, real cleanup is expensive. Susan has received honours and accolades from various government levels including municipal, regional and likely provincial. Governments are even more securely in bed with corporate polluters than Susan has ever been. Honours from them are hypocritical and worthless and Susan knows that but accepts them anyways. Why?