THE LANCASTER ST. WELLFIELD - A HISTORY OF LOW WAGES, HIGH PROFITS AND HIGH ENVIRONMENTAL & HEALTH DAMAGES

 

Many of the longtime nearby residents don't remember the "good old days".  The stench of acrid, acidic fumes leaving the site. The generally modest albeit well built homes nearby on Edwin St., Loiusa St., St. Leger etc. A company called Pannill Veneer operated on the site for decades before it closed down. Prior to Panill Veneer however was the Breithaupt Tannery. Solvents, acids and heavy metals were common and well recognized from the tannery industry. It operated approximately from the 1880s until about 1950 before shutting down. There were other tanneries in Kitchener-Waterloo and they too made a mess and left the mess for others to clean up. These industries like so many others were protected by the politicians that they helped to get elected. These same politicians minimized the negative environmental and health effects of these companies both on employees and residents while they were operating and making money as well as after they cut and ran. This is what politicians do especially if they hope to have the funds to get re-elected.

The very same politicians and their successors allowed all the anti social aspects of these heavy, stinking and loud industries, often situated beside residential areas, without proper safeguards or even reasonable mitigating efforts. Then when they packed up and departed little to no effort was made to hold them accountable to clean up the mess they left behind. These were very unhealthy messes combined with high costs to clean them up. Politicians did what they always do. They lied like dogs and passed the costs on to the public taxpayers as much as possible. The Breithaupt Tannery $ 9 million cleanup was the most expensive in Kitchener's history. It was funded by the City of Kitchener (taxpayers), The Region of Waterloo (taxpayers) and the developer (Queensgate Dev't.) who by the way complained that the Province of Ontario (taxpayers) failed to chip in.  Three levels of taxpayers but all out of the same pockets.

Never any health studies, never any environmental studies until after a developer decided they could make money on the site. Breithaupt Tannery did not just mess up people's health through noise and air emissions. They also contaminated the nearby Lancaster Wellfield which supplied water to Kitchener citizens. How many of them died prematurely and or with compromised health issues while the bast**d politicians and industrialists laughed all the way to the bank? 

The nearby Lancaster Wellfield has been shut down now for a very long time. Do you think they shut it down the day the Tannery closed? Did they shut it down before the toxic contaminants reached the drinking wells? Meanwhile Waterloo Region are recommissioning other shut down, contaminated wells so why not these? Allegedly there has been a major cleanup. Or was it? Regardless if we are so desperate for water the Region can reopen these wells with or without an Environmental Assessment. Just like local industry in Elmira and K-W,  Waterloo Region knows that Environmental Assessments are easy to "fix". Afterall it's politicians who write the legislation, warts and loopholes and all.

DNAPLS - THE VERBOTEN WORD FOR LANXESS & THEIR CORRUPT "REGULATOR" THE MECP

 

A little bit of irony here. The stupid twits invent a weird pretend scientific test to prove one thing and actually prove the very last thing they intended which is that there both have been and are free phase and residual DNAPL in the Municipal Upper and Lower Aquifers beneath the town of Elmira. Keep in mind how late in the game the dirty polluter and their fellow travellors decided that the high concentrations of both NDMA and chlorobenzene needed further efforts. Not back in 1998 when the off-site groundwater pumping began but many years later they added pumping wells W8 and W9 to address specific problems on the east and west sides of Union St. not very far from Park Ave. The east side of the street was actually at the edge of the Yara (Nutrite) property and the pumping well went right down to the Municipal Lower Aquifer. High chlorobenzene concentrations were embarrassing and needed to be reduced in order to continue the DNAPL coverup which said that free phase DNAPLS had never left the Uniroyal Chemical site. The W9 pumping well also went right through to the Municipal Lower Aquifer and in fact its' well screen rested on the surface of the exposed Bedrock Aquifer.  There is no LAT (Lower Aquitard) located here thus providing a direct route for contamination. Yes this is one of the main routes that has contaminated the Bedrock Aquifer with both NDMA, chlorobenzene and everything else despite the professional liars on behalf of Lanxess Canada/Uniroyal Chemical saying otherwise.

Table 2 (CH38A  ML aquifer) gives us our first hint. This observation well located by Industrial Dr. and Oriole Parkway (Sanyo Canada right there) reacted strongly to the cessation of pumping at W3R almost two hundred metres southwards. From Non-Detect for chlorobenzene on June 25/26 before pumping stopped, it in a few days jumped to 40 and later 45 ppb. after pumping was stopped at W3R. After pumping was restarted concentrations of chlorobenzene fell to Non-Detect again. This is due to likely residual DNAPL left over from the years long heavy pumping at W4 further north and a little east of CH38 and had caused unusually high concentrations of chlorobenzene at that well for decades. W4 beside the Howard St. Water Tower and observation well OW57-32R was the location of free phase DNAPL 100 feet below ground surface originally confirmed and then denied by CRA, Uniroyal and the M.O.E..

Table 2 (OW119-27  MU aquifer) tells a somewhat similar story. Prior to pumping being stopped this well three metres north of pumping well W3R had a concentration of 68.1 ppb. of chlorobenzene and within a few days of the cessation of pumping it was at 30.7 ppb. dropping down to .98 (yes less than 1) ppb over the shutdown weeks and then jumping back up to 83.3 ppb. after pumping at W3R was restored. Clearly the core of the chlorobenzene plume has been drawn towards W3R by its' pumping and then drifts away when pumping stops. The ongoing chlorobenzene concentrations up to the drinking standard criteria of 80 ppb. after nearly thirty years of pumping are the obvious and clear  result of subsurface residual or free phase DNAPL presence which dissolves very much more slowly in water than NDMA and most other solvents. 

Table 2 (OW155-32  ML aquifer)  This observation well is located about five metres north of pumping well W5A and had a chlorobenzene concentration of Non-Detect prior to the shutdown of pumping. Within a few days its' concentration had jumped to 135 ppb. It stayed above the drinking water standard throughout the pump shutdown period and then somewhat oddly remained high (151 ppb) even more than two months after pumping restarted at W5A. I see two possibilities here. This pumping well is very close to the south-west corner of the Uniroyal/Lanxess site and either free phase or residual DNAPL  exists very nearby or since pumping well W4 to the west (Water Tower area) was shut down several years ago the remaining contaminant plume has via W5A pumping migrated eastwards towards  itself (i.e. W5A). Either way this again is the second area where DNAPL left the Uniroyal site decades ago and has permanently contaminated the Elmira Aquifers (including Bedrock).

Lastly we have Table 2 (CH44D  ML aquifer)  Here we have a monitoring well twenty metres north of pumping well W8. I guess I may have saved the best for last. Its' concentration prior to the cessation of pumping was 4.56 ppb (parts per billion). Within a few days of pumping being stopped the chlorobenzene concentration had soared to 703 ppb. !!!  It remained high throughout the shutdown period exceeding 1,000 ppb. on two occasions. Then in November two months after pumping restarted it was back down to 20.1 ppb. !!!  This tells me a couple of things. Firstly either residual or free phase DNAPL is present right there in the ML aquifer very close to W8 and CH44D and the volume of groundwater impacted is small leading to amazingly fast reactions to both stopping and restarting the pumping regime. Also based upon a similar reaction to pumping by NDMA I suspect that the NDMA may very well be mixed in with the DNAPL . 

What have I slowly learned over thirty-six years? Thin skinned and faint of heart individuals have a much higher tolerance for well dressed, well spoken liars, cheats and thieves than they do for those who would point out these character deficiencies and speak of them. Hence my apologies to the Jens, Sandys, Sebastians, Nathans and others who are far more impressed than I by the Ramin Ansaris, Allan Deals, Lou Almeidas, Steve Quigleys, Hadley Stamms, Lubnas, Jasons, and so many more. While I don't share your character priorities I try to understand them despite occasionally finding them grating. Also the term "cheats and thieves" may be interpreted as more figurative than literal.    

  

"GHD HAVE PRODUCED ANOTHER REPORT FOR PUBLIC CORRUPTION" - A ONE WORD CHANGE FROM YESTERDAY'S BLOG POSTING'S FIRST SENTENCE

  

I replaced the word "consumption" with the word "corruption". Both are accurate. Basically TRAC just like previous iterations of Woolwich Council controlled CPAC and UPAC are out of their depth, corrupt bodies by intention. Their mandates are typical Dave Brenneman (CAO) BS. CAO stands for Chief Executive Officer and BS does not stand for Brotherhood of Sisters. Some of the TRAC members, especially the newer ones,  may believe the propaganda whereas it is difficult to believe that the longer  running TRAC (previously TAG) members don't know any better. Susan Bryant in particular has known what's been going on for decades and has enjoyed herself playing the game with the local bigshots, polluters, bureaucrats and politicians. 

Today I'm looking at the Figures and Tables presented in the extremely recent "Lanxess Canada Municipal Aquifer Steady State Conditions Trial Report".  As mentioned yesterday there actually is no steady state being examined. Not only is pumping well E7 doing its' thing at the south end of Elmira but the two Municipal Upper Aquifer wells are pumping at the north end on the Uniroyal/Lanxess site. Add to that the failure of pumping well W5A at the crucial moment and you've really got very little science going on. This report is recommending further similar tests down the road albeit of longer duration which is a very bad idea. Honest brokers doing experiments on contaminated aquifers is one thing but long term, client driven, for profit consultants is something entirely different. My and everybody else who are knowledgeable and honest (barely a handful locally) legitimately can suspect not only junk science and nonsensical conclusions but also no more than a financial holiday from pumping for Lanxess Canada.  

The Figures allegedly show groundwater elevation changes as well as some difference in flow direction during the shutdown and later startup of off-site pumping underneath parts of Elmira.  The Tables allegedly show groundwater contamination concentrations for numerous known Uniroyal Chemical contaminants over the course of the test. Except they don't! They show a grand total of seven monitoring well results including double counting the observation wells screened in both the Municipal Upper and Municipal Lower aquifers namely CH38, OW155 and then three others namely OW 119, OW175 and CH44D screened in one aquifer. That's it which hardly gives a full picture of the levels of contamination throughout Elmira's subsurface. 

Getting back to the number of contaminants tested there are allegedly sixteen VOCs and SVOCs (volatile organics/semi volatile organics) in total including NDMA and chlorobenzene. Even here the company cheaped out and worse by not  testing them on a weekly basis before, during and after the shutdown and startup as they did their favourite two namely NDMA and chlorobenzene. Unbelievably they tested the majority (14 of 16) just prior to the shutdown and then just prior to the restart of pumping. A couple of extra contaminants also got tested in November 2025 two to three months after the restart of off-site pumping. Despite less than surprising results at most of the specifically chosen well locations there were a few surprises of both higher and lower results than expected with NDMA and chlorobenzene. This is why all the listed Uniroyal contaminants should have been fully tested equally with NDMA and chlorobenzene. Of course doing so just might have surprised them particularly with the other (than chlorobenzene) four chlorinated solvents including chlorophenols, dichlorophenols and even perhaps non chlorinated aniline. 

This report is just one more in a long litany of self-serving, public relations tools by Uniroyal/Lanxess to build and maintain the facade that they and their fellow travellors are and have been doing everything possible to remediate the Elmira Aquifers. Unfortunately sweet talk, puffery, psuedo science and phony public consultation  does not clean aquifers. Good science, honest intentions and communication and money do.

THE INTENTIONALLY BLIND LEADING THE TRULY BLIND - "DNAPL " IS VERBOTEN

  GHD have produced another report for public consumption . Like many of the rest it goes best with lots of sugar, artificial sweetener and or grease to help it slide down.  Perhaps money and self-interest are the very best forms of grease as they tend to ensure that alleged troublemakers, radicals and activists are ignored while bought and paid for intellectual prostitutes are given undue respect and credibility. The report is titled  "Lanxess Canada Municipal Aquifer Steady State Conditions Trial Report".

Basically the entire premise of the report is a croc. It is supposed to examine monitoring wells throughout the Elmira Aquifers to determine if there is significant "rebound" in contaminant concentrations AFTER  pumping in the Elmira aquifers has stopped. Well it never fully stopped as the major pumping well at the south end of Elmira (E7) continued pumping it's little heart out. There was also the somewhat embarassing issue with pumping well W5A located just south and west of the Lanxess site.  It kicked the bucket just BEFORE the so called pumping trial began. Oops! Also the number of monitoring wells and their location were not appropriate for what was supposed to be the rationale of the trial. No where near enough monitoring wells and all were located way too close to the pumping wells causing immediate drastic results either when the wells were shut down or when they were started up again.

As usual the maps/Figures supplied are too small for most eyes over 40 years old plus the text in attached Tables to them are even worse to read. Finally colour printers are required for those of us who no longer rate hard copies and must download tiny, coloured maps/Figures electronically. It's all a good way to thin out the field of critics. The analytical Tables provided could also have used two, vertical lines on each  showing when pumping was stopped and then restarted. It would have made the Tables more understandable.

Discussion and Conclusions are basically pathetic. There's a fair bit of jabber regarding anaerobic conditions, ORP (oxidation reduction), RPD (relative percent difference), ammonia, phosphates and nitrates plus DO (dissolved oxygen) that may excite biologists but not so much hydrogeologists. At least these big words make GHD look smart and help muddy the waters as probably intended.

Most importantly Lanxess, GHD and the MECP (Min. of Environment)   have scrupulously avoided the one word which must NOT be spoken, written or uttered upon excommunication from the Royal Order Of  Flamboyant  and Treasured Water Investigating Testifiers otherwise known as  ROOFTWITS. The magic word that they must not utter is     DNAPLS    . Under no circumstances they insist could either free phase or residual DNAPLS ever be the reason for high chlorobenzene concentrations or persistent chlorobenzene detections nearly thirty years after groundwater remediation by pump & treat has been ongoing. Oddly every other site with gross chlorobenzene and lots more chlorinated solvents contamination is recognized as a DNAPL site but here in Woolwich Township by the waving of magic wands and the intonation of non satanic chants; DNAPLS have been kept at bay. 

Thank God for their majesties Ken Seiling, Sandy Shantz and even Karen Redman.   

LETS MAKE A DEAL - HOW THE ONT. MIN. OF ENVIRONMENT NURTURES DIRTY POLLUTERS

 

First of all contrary to every credentialed sod and suit who have lost their credibility and integrity and agree with Lanxess Canada and the Ontario Min. of Environment that there is not any chlorobenzene in the Bedrock aquifer; I say this. Intellectual prostitution is no more glamorous than the real thing. In some aspects it is worse.

The reason that this lie suggesting that sure there is NDMA in the Bedrock Aquifer but not chlorobenzene is because NDMA is more easily dissolved and more easily pumped. It can be removed much easier from both aquifers and aquitards than chlorobenzene, a DNAPL chemical. Hence just as the leadership of APTE (Susan B. & Sylvia) were coopted in the early 1990s into becoming DNAPL deniers so both Uniroyal Chemical and the Ont. Min. of Environment (MOE/MECP) colluded in their October 1991 Agreement and November 4, 1991 Control Order to pretend that there were no free phase DNAPLS (Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids) either on the Uniroyal site or off their site having migrated into all the aquifers below the town of  Elmira. 

It is obvious to honest people with even a little bit of hydrogeological knowledge. Looking at the "Schematic Of Hydrogeologic Units Lanxess Canada Co." which are produced by Uniroyal/Crompton/Chemtura and now Lanxess over the last thirty-six years makes it very clear. These one page subsurface "maps"  are also known as Conceptual Site Models. From the top right corner showing the Creek ("Gig") and the UA (Upper Aquifer) one can follow the blue coloured aquifers downwards into the MU (Municipal Upper) then follow the blue MU leftwards (west & south) until it reaches more blue (marked LGR -low gamma resistivity) and descends further downwards into the ML (Municipal Lower) . From there moving to the right (i.e. north and a little east) one comes to the following FOUR wells all pumping NDMA, chlorobenzene and so much more namely W6A, W5A, W9 and W8. By the way there is also likely a window just to the right of W8 which corresponds to OW58 as stated in yesterday's Blog posting. It goes through the MAT (Municipal Aquitard) and connects the MU with the ML. 

Meanwhile and here's the kicker. THE BEDROCK AQUIFER IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MUNICIPAL LOWER AQUIFER exactly where three of the four pumping wells (W5A, W6A, W9) well screens sit directly on top of the Bedrock. They are pumping both ML water and BR water albeit the free phase chlorobenzene (& more) DNAPL that gravity flowed into this location are from either or both the north-east window (near OW58) or from the south-west window (near W4, OW57-32R, Howard St. water tower); is likely long gone into the fissures and cracks of the fractured Bedrock Aquifer. There could be some free phase DNAPL still left in the ML or not but certainly that which is into the Bedrock Aquifer is there forever. 

This is but part of the coverup, collusion and corruption between Uniroyal Chemical and the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MECP). Surviving APTE members may some day be able to figure out how early on their leadership betrayed them. Or not. Time will tell.     

LANXESS & MECP FINDING IT HARDER TO COVERUP THE TRUTH AS PLUMES SHRINK BACKWARDS TO THEIR SOURCE

 

You know most children by the age of six or seven have learned that lying usually only makes things worse. Statements like the dog did it or the baby did it rarely fly with parents. Unfortunately as a society we have learned to condone dishonesty in many forms. 

Yesterday's July 23, 2026 report by GHD sent to the Min. of Environment (MECP) and titled "Municipal Aquifer Steady State Conditions Trial" is an example of what my Blog title is all about. I understand that exceptions to the fibbing rule exist which include two dishonest parties sending knowingly false information back and forth in order to reinforce their agreed upon self-serving "truths". No one is offended because both parties have long ago agreed to the deception. Examples abound such as President Bush lying about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). England and the U.S. needed some justification for attacking Iraq so they jointly made sh*#  up. Countries do it, individuals do it and polluting corporations do it. 

There are a host of made up falsehoods regarding the Elmira Water Crisis.  Only a very few to date have been debunked or admitted to such as Allan Deal (GHD) admitting to TRAC that Varnicolor Chemical contributed chlorinated solvents to the Elmira drinking water aquifers (MA) as per the Minutes of their September 12, 2024 meeting in Council Chambers. This was on page 7 and on page 6 of these Minutes is also finally the admission of DNAPL existing near pumping well W4 by the Howard St. Water Tower and beside monitoring well OW57-32R. 

The page 6 admission regarding off-site DNAPL presence is important in the context of yesterday's  report as it clarifies why Figures 5 & 7 clearly show both the remaining Municipal Upper and Municipal Lower Aquifer locations of chlorobenzene in Elmira's subsurface. They are located  to the immediate east of former pumping well W4 as well as of monitoring wells OW57-32R and OW57-38 . The remaining plumes in both aquifers (MU, ML) are directly beneath the former Varnicolor Chemical site with Howard Ave. on their south side and First Ave on their north side. Both plumes cross under Union St. as they are slowly pulled towards pumping wells W5A/B in each aquifer. Also of interest in yesterday's report is the statement on page 15 in the Conclusions that  "GHD notes that extraction wells were drilled in the core of the existing plumes at the time of installation.". This explains the location of pumping well W4 beside the free phase DNAPL clearly discovered prior to the startup of the off-site pumping in August 1998 but denied originally at a CPAC meeting around 2004-5 when I presented a writeup about it found in a monthly Progress Report. It was then denied repeatedly for years until the admission of its' presence at the September 12, 2024 TRAC meeting. 

DNAPLS (chlorobenzene & more) left the Uniroyal Chemical site decades ago in at least two locations ending up by the Howard St. Water Tower and by monitoring well OW58-24 on the property line with Nutrite/Yara via a "window" through the Municipal Aquitard.  Both Uniroyal and the Ontario M.O.E. colluded to hide and deny this fact from the public in order to preserve their sweetheart deal which covered up the Ministry's negligence and incompetence and which reduced Uniroyal's cleanup costs by millions of dollars. 

Sorry for the upset and disruption to thin skinned individuals at Woolwich Township who insist on playing nice with those who don't play nice, much less legally. 

EXACTLY HOW MANY YEARS HAS THE GREENBROOK WELLFIELD BEEN SHUT DOWN SINCE 2000 ?

 

This is but one of the retreaded wellfields that Waterloo Region are reopening in their desperation to keep builders and developers happy. Don't worry they do the risk calculations and theoretically at least while your risk of getting cancer will certainly rise with all these contaminated aquifers being put back in service; the numbers may be tiny such as an increase from 2 or 3 "excess" cancers in a million to a marginally greater 4 "excess" cancers in a million. No worries there especially as hardly any of us have friends, colleagues or relatives suffering cancers, past cancers or fatal cancers. Right?

 The Greenbrook Wellfield wells, K1, K2, K4B, K5A and K8 located near Homer Watson Blvd. and Stirling Ave. in Kitchener were all on standby status from at least 2003 until 2007. Newspaper accounts also advise us that that situation has continued during the 2020s whether from a chlorine/ammonia screwup and explosion or from the 1,4 dioxane contamination that came from the Ottawa St. Landfill. Now there have also been well redrills and replacements in this wellfield as the current wells are now known as K1A, K2A, K4C, K5A and K8.  These machinations if you will are common practice for the Region when they have "problematic" wells and examples in Cambridge for example include drilling past and through a contaminated zone of a well in order to pump water from a deeper less contaminated or uncontaminated zone.   

It is my opinion that this Grand River Source Protection Area Assessment Report Chapter 8, July 29, 2025 is unnecessarily thick and inflated with data that is at best filler or meant to make reading difficult and tedious. That said with enough patience and tenacity and overall knowledge a serious person can find much to be concerned with regarding this wellfield. Firstly the chances of 1,4 dioxane being the only toxic contaminant to reach the Greenbrook Wellfield from the Ottawa St. Landfill is somewhere between zero and nil. Look for benzene, chlorinated solvents and all the usual array of industrial solvents that were dumped there including by Elmira industries such as Varnicolor Chemical and if I might hazard a guess probably Uniroyal Chemical as well back in the day. Paper restrictions were strong whereas physical restrictions were not.

Other issues include high chlorides and high sodiums maybe from road salt but also common from industrially contaminated aquifers. Also I should applaud at least a couple of the Figures in this report as they do identify the Total Number of Significant Threat Activities as well as the Total Number of Properties with Significant Threats. Those numbers are huge (630, 379). They also indicate both High Unadjusted Intrinsic Vulnerability levels for this wellfield as well as High Adjusted Intrinsic Vulnerability threats to water quality. 

Waterloo Region are desperate to keep the water flowing and in my opinion they are risking your and my health for their own benefit. What else is new when it comes to water protection.