TODAY'S RECORD ARTICLE ("SLEEPING GIANT") WAS INFORMATIVE & EDUCATIONAL ALBEIT WITH VERY LITTLE NEW INFORMATION

 

Two things did pop out at me though. The repeated claim that the two disinfection systems aren't mixed together because they produce stinky/smelly water and secondly the claim that the Bedrock Aquifer below the Waterloo Moraine contains too much sulphur and manganese whereas the Bedrock Aquifer below Cambridge is fine for potable water. Now I have gone and checked and indeed they are two distinct Bedrock formations and both have Dolostone in them. Now I have often heard that Bedrock Aquifer water isn't as aesthetically pleasing as Overburden water from sand and gravels. Bedrock Aquifers certainly have been noted as having a sulphur smell to them. But why is one fine and the other not?

Again regarding the two disinfection systems I would like more than the bald claim that the water from them together produces smells. I would also like to see a confirmation that indeed the two disinfection systems are chlorine versus chloramines. My understanding is that both disinfection systems produce chlorine smells which everybody knows and nobody likes.

To date no response to my Saturday posting here advising of the various groundwater wells affected by industrial contamination in Waterloo Region. This includes nothing from Woolwich Council, Waterloo Regional Council, TRAC, MECP (Environment Ministry), Lanxess Canada, K-W Record and the Woolwich Observer. In other words currently neither the media, the Ontario Ministry of Environment, three levels of government (2 councils & 1 provincial ministry), the corporation currently responsible for restoring the Elmira Aquifers (Lanxess) and finally the Woolwich Council appointed citizens committee (TRAC) have responded with either requests for further data or with questions. 

Here in Ontario and Woolwich Township that means public engagement and public consultation actually are more about avoiding public consultation with informed and determined citizens than otherwise. It means promoting conversation with folks deferential to authority but avoiding at all costs public discussions with those who ask either difficult or embarrassing questions. I would further suggest that the more informed and difficult questioners are defamed, backstabbed and discriminated against by our elected authorities.   

  

WATER NEWS: FEAR OF PRIVATIZATION & $100 MILLION RESERVE FUND UNTOUCHED WITH REPAIRS & REBUILDS SITTING IDLE

 

Terry Pender of the K-W Record has a front page article titled "Water crisis sparks fears of privatization" and Luisa D'Amato has an Opinion piece titled "A truce is reached in the water crisis, but the hard work is ahead". Regarding the privatization fears I suggest that the Region likely through their councillors have played directly into Doug Ford and the Conservatives hands. Apparently Bill 60 is the culprit as the provincial Conservative government passed it last year which among other things permits the sale of municipality's water infrastructure to private corporations. Politicians such as our own Sandy Shantz used the Min. of Environment's and Chemtura's boycott of CPAC back in late 2014 as an excuse to dump citizen volunteers on CPAC despite it being the intransigence and dishonesty of the other two parties impeding cleanup progress. Now the Region have handed the provincial government the excuse they need on a platter. Clearly the Region of Waterloo are incompetent as they have allowed our water system to deteriorate so badly.

Luisa D'Amato's Opinion piece is a little different. She states that a truce has been reached between developers, builders and the Region of Waterloo. Not so fast Luisa. I view your "truce" as more of a capitulation. What do you think brought on this water crisis in the first place? Clearly regional councillors are all ears when developers and friends come calling but deaf and blind when environmentalists and activists (i.e. citizens)  appear as Delegates requesting either slower growth or better infrastructure such as water treatment, sewage treatment, better remediation of contaminated sites etc. 

I will say that I do agree with Ms. D'Amato in regards to hard work being needed as well as answers to questions being required such as why was this water crisis such a surprise to so many.

HOO BOY ARE WE (RMOW) IN BIG WATER TROUBLE! DEVELOPERS, BUILDERS & POSSIBLY EVEN REPORTERS SIMPLY HAVE NO IDEA

 

I've been following all the articles, opinion pieces and Letters To The Editor carefully. Overall K-W Record reporters are doing a great job bringing the facts as they know them to the public's attention. The trouble is that the Region have been much less than forthcoming for many decades now hence neither the public, the developers, builders, politicians or the media truly understand the mess we are in. The bottom line is that having read Luisa D'Amato's TWO page article titled "Will we have enough water ?" the answer is an unequivocal no. Luisa among other things advises readers about the steps to increase our water supply both immediately plus over the next four or five years and I find that terrifying.

Why is it terrifying? It is terrifying because the Region clearly are desperate to avoid litigation from developers and builders who have sunk large amounts of time and money into proposed new developments whether they be detached homes, townhouses, condominiums or office buildings. How desperate you ask? They are so desperate they are pardon the pun "Going back to the well" in order to increase their water supply. Some of these "wells" have been shut down for years and in some cases decades. Why were they shut down in the first place, you ask. Because they were CONTAMINATED. This includes trichloeoethylene (TCE) in the Parkway wells (Deilcraft), benzene in the Greenbrook Wellfield (courtesy of Ottawa St. Landfill), multiple solvents and industrial chemicals with PCBs floating in oil (LNAPL)  upgradient of the Woolner and Pompeii Wellfields along the Grand River (Breslube). Other problems with these river wells as they are called is odour issues that do not occur in groundwater wells located away from surface water. Speaking of surface water the Middleton Wellfield is in the south end of Cambridge right beside the Grand River. The wells however are screened in the Bedrock Aquifer and likely would be separate from the river water however they are not separate from the free phase (DNAPL) TCE in the fractured bedrock fissures and pores.

Also pumping more water from the Middleton Wellfield which supposedly can be then pumped uphill to Waterloo and Kitchener will likely draw out more dissolved TCE from the Bedrock Aquifers. As it is there is a special and very expensive TCE treatment system called AOP (Advanced Oxidation Process). The other allegedly still unresolved problem is the different bacterial disinfection system used at the Middleton Wellfield versus the Mannheim Service Area.  My guess is that we are talking a chlorine system versus a chloramine system.

Wilmot Township have been picked to supply water to the Mannheim Service Area almost immediately. That combined with the loss of recharge due to the 700 acre proposed industrial megasite should go over well with Wilmot residents and politicians. Gravel pits, industrial megasites, plus supplying water to K-W  should be a fairly explosive mixture for the Region.

So let's summarize. We (developers, builders, politicians) want one million people here by 2050. Do we also want more contaminated water being mixed with what clean water we have left to keep us at least technically below the Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS)? Are we so desperate for growth that we will continue to revive old, shut down contaminated wells to boost our water supply? Meanwhile our river water source (The Grand) will continue receiving increasingly larger loads of treated (hopefully) human sewage as we approach one million people. WHAT POSSIBLY COULD GO WRONG WITH THIS SCENARIO?

"HEADS SHOULD ROLL AT REGION FOR NOT PROTECTING WATER"

Not coincidentally the title of this posting is identical to the one in the K-W Record's Letters To The Editor today. That Letter is written by John Waylett on behalf of the Property Taxpayers Alliance. While Mr. Waylett takes umbrage with MPP Aislinn Clancy's recent article criticizing Premier Doug Ford's environmental missteps, I feel that there is room to agree with both of them.  Yes Doug and the provincial Conservative government have behaved towards the environment exactly as is to be expected by a Conservative government. In other words badly. 

At the same time clearly our regional government have been leading us down the garden path for many decades as they blithely swallowed the Federal and Provincial Growth mantra without conditions or proper preparation.  Did we learn nothing from the 30,000-40,000 influx of Indian students attending Conestoga College? The Region did not have enough housing, jobs, food banks, healthcare, sewage treatment or drinking water facilities to keep up to the demand. 

Mr. Waylett is also correct in that the Region need to disclose to taxpayers how we got into this latest crisis involving water supply. Remember this is after the influx of students has been dramatically reduced. Does anyone really believe the Grand River, as a depository of our many sewage treatment plants, is ever going  to be the same after we hit 1,000,000 people living and working here? I for one do not.

My last point is this. Ultimately regional senior planners and water managers will do as they are told by a multitude of uneducated and woefully ignorant "professional" politicians. The word "professional" does not refer to their academic or technical qualifications it refers to their abilities to fib, gild the lily and weasel out of accountability and responsibility. When in trouble they will hire more credentialed staff (to hide behind and ignore) and form more committees (citizens' preferably) to insulate themselves from crises and blame of their own making.

DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS WIN AT REGIONAL COUNCIL

 

Well I'd sure be keeping an eye on Barry Vrbanovic as well as all the other regional councillors who voted to ignore their own third party report which stated "..in 2023, 2024 and 2025, unsustainable levels of water was pumped from the Waterloo Moraine, lowering aquifer water levels faster than they can be replenished.." . This quote was read to them by Kevin Thomason vice-chair of the Grand River Environmental Network (GREN). Despite this regional council decided to earmark 50% of new water capacity to support future development.

Today's K-W Record carries the following article by Bill Jackson titled "Up to half of new water capacity to support future development".  Some interesting (for me)other points in the article include the name Amy Shaw. Oh boy unless I'm losing it that would be Amy Shaw former Ministry of Environment employee for many years. I can't say much bad about her other than her choice of employer although the name does not give me any confidence but maybe she got out of the M.O.E. for a solid reason such as they are all talk, hot air and deception. Kudos to Geoff Moroz of the Region (staff) who confirmed that the region has been producing (i.e. pumping) more water than it can sustainably take. 

Clearly both his and Kevin Thomason's words and knowledge were given little weight by our clearly pro growth, pro development regional council. Remember that folks when you turn on the tap at home and get nothing but a big "Truck You" echoing down the pipe.

UNDERMINING, LYING, CHARACTER ASSASSINATION AND FOR WHAT?

 

You know I have far more respect for the Ruby Weber's of the world with their right wing, pro business positions and opinions then I do for the local, former, psuedo environmentalist Elmira residents who have cut and run. This is because I think that Ruby is a true believer whereas the others are simply opportunists looking out for number one and if that means switching sides mid stream then so be it.. Ruby was a Woolwich Council member for many years and very sympathetic to Uniroyal Chemical. She never forgot that they provided local jobs and tax revenue despite the mess they've made environmentally. In fact if she were still involved herself with TRAC and the former TAG I expect that she would have expressed her horror at how Uniroyal's promises have turned out to be nothing but wind. I also got to know her through a couple of other local issues and was pleased with her common sense as well as of her ethics of fair play. Quite possibly her, what I view as right wing, pro business attitudes, may very well have been due to her husband Amsey who I understood to be a self-made man. A self-made man who was an astute businessman who did well for himself and family.  

It is that lack of ethics, decency and fair play which have appalled me in regards to Sylvia Berg, Susan Bryant and Pat Mclean. Their modus operandi is not to declare war on someone they view as a threat or a risk to their plans but to claim friendship and collegiality along with common interests. They do not want their intended victim to even see coming their assault of lies and deceptions all intended to lower that individual's status, standing and positions be they environmental or otherwise. It is my opinion based upon personal experience that there is no room in their lives to treat others as well as they've been treated. Their incredibly self-centered approach is to slowly undermine while pretending the opposite. It does not matter that the intended victim doesn't even know that they are in the cross- hairs of their sights. The victim does not have to be intentionally undermining goals and plans that he/she are totally unaware of. In fact if asked they would likely, honestly respond oh no those self-centred goals can not be their's. 

Further thoughts have come to mind. Susan Bryant did not like Bill Strauss at all. She claimed to me that his speaking and education were an embarrassment to Woolwich Township. On the other hand both Pat McLean and Sandy Shantz liked Bill Strauss because as mayor he worked with them on Council or perhaps Pat thought she was manipulating him as she attempted with others. At first Pat made her dislike of Sandy clear based on losing her council seat to her. Later they were best buddies as both Susan and Pat worked on Sandy's election campaigns. In the scheme of lying manipulators I would rate Susan as number one, Sylvia as number 2 and Pat as number three.  

It has been specific Woolwich Council members working mostly through Susan and Pat that have enabled Uniroyal and successors, in harmony with the Ontario Ministry of Environment, to give Woolwich residents a totally inadequate and unsuccessful cleanup of their groundwater, surface water and soils and sediments.

A CULTURE OF LYING & DISINFORMATION: CAN IT BE OVERCOME TO SOLVE WATER PROBLEMS?

 

Some politicians might even admit quietly that lying to the public is an art form. They might suggest that every lie requires a fallback position. That fallback position might be new information that the public generally don't have. It might be scapegoating another political party for "obstructing" your legislative agenda. It might be blaming a higher tier of government such as the provinces blaming Ottawa and the Federal government for environmental failures. When in great trouble relying on "acts of God",  weather emergencies, outside influences, immigrants, the radical left whatever is the hot button issue of the day helps. Unions and labour unrest used to be a great scapegoat for corporations and businesses to blame when their outdated  products or technologies were no longer competitive. All in all accepting responsibility and taking blame for mistakes and failures is not the preferred option.

So according to today's K-W Record the Region of Waterloo are planning on using another $15 million dollars of taxpayers money to bring in a type of "workaround" technology.  This technology is referred to as container filtration systems.  A quick on-line check shows that several companies sell prefabricated water treatment systems generally for smaller applications including mining camps, isolated small locations involving using surface water (creeks & rivers) versus wells and even industrial plants. Yes they do claim that they can properly treat river water which in the case of the Grand River includes high turbidity (murkiness), pathogens such as bacteria and viruses, heavy metals, industrial discharges (legal or otherwise), parasites from cattle including cryptosporidium and less than perfect treatment of human wastes.  Lets not forget nice things like dead fish and animals that end up in the river not to mention the odd human body found immersed.

These new units apparently can produce 25 litres per second of clean water hence you would need at least eight of them to up our water supply by a whole 200 litres per second.  Boy that's not very much and certainly tells me that this is simply a workaround or maybe even a bandaid approach. Now I did the math on a couple of commercial units and they claim a somewhat higher volume of water produced than 25 l/sec but maybe the Region are simply being conservative in their estimates. Regardless based upon this one article and half an hour of research I am a little underwhelmed. 

But then again our local developers and builders want results yesterday and maybe that's exactly what they are going to get. Remember no problem is so serious and so bad that rushed, panicked decision making can not make it worse. Are our regional politicians up to the challenge? Hey we all elected the buggars so we get what we deserve.