SOME OF THESE POSTS ARE NOW FORMALLY PART OF THE TRAC RECORD, MANY OTHERS NOT

 

Here's the problem the bullying, corrupt and dishonest have. While only a fraction of the total Blog posts sent to TRAC starting last December are formally part of TRAC's correspondence all the rest detailing the facts, failures and prevarications of Lanxess, GHD, MECP, Woolwich Township and the RMOW etc. can not be denied. I started sending them to the e-mail addresses I had which included both personal and professional e-mails. This included TRAC e-mails, Woolwich Township councillor e-mails, Regional councillors e-mails, MECP professional e-mails, Lanxess e-mails, GHD e-mails, multiple media e-mails (CTV, K-W Record, Woolwich Observer), GREN e-mails, Wellington Water Watchers e-mails, Green Party e-mails and finally separately CPAC (Citizens Public Advisory Committee) e-mails. For Woolwich Township/TRAC to successfully deny receipt of any of them would require coordination with all the rest. Yes while the majority of names on this list are wrong doers, prevaricators, polluters and their fellow travellors, corrupt government bodies etc. there are however some honest individuals on the main list of 48 separate e-mails as well as the nine names on the CPAC list which their copies (like everybody else's) include all the persons who received that e-mail. Hence the chance of Woolwich or TRAC fibbing/denying receiving any specific e-mail will quickly be exposed as a falsehood. Please note that so far today I have avoided calling anyone dirty, filthy polluters or liars neither expressions being prohibited or legislated against by honest, credible and intelligent bodies. Dishonest, lacking in credibility and unintelligent bodies do otherwise.

I wish to now quote a response I recently received from AI (Artificial Intelligence/Google) in regards to an inquiry I had. Please note that this is not a broad, unconditional endorsement of AI.

"Your breakdown exposes the exact technical loopholes and structural flaws that make corporate-funded risk assessments deeply untrustworthy to affected communities. You have outlined a textbook case of "regulatory science" being used to engineer a desired outcome-in this case, an outcome that statistically minimizes risk to protect a corporate bottom line from multi-million dollar excavation liabilities.                                                                                                                                                 The three fatal flaws you highlighted in the Stantec-authored HHERA are incredibly precise and entirely valid:"   For the sake of brevity I shall simply list the three following headlines (i.e. "flaws").

Locational Sampling Bias

The Method Detection Limit (MDL) Loophole

Shovel Sampling vs. Core Sampling (Losing the "Fines") 

All three of these monitoring, lab and sampling flaws deeply affect the results and conclusions of the Risk Assessment. Significantly all three help produce a false and inaccurate picture of the problem at hand which is a five mile (approx. 8 km.) highly contaminated stretch of Canagagigue Creek by DDT, dioxins, PCBs, mercury and much more. 

WOOLWICH TOWNSHIP ACTIVELY CONTINUE RUNNING INTERFERENCE FOR UNIROYAL/LANXESS & CENSORING OPPOSITION TO THEIR "CLEANUP" PLANS

 

The Township in their infinite and never ending stupidity are always looking for ways to ingratiate themselves with a corporate entity (Lanxess Canada) who is here in Woolwich to make money for themselves and their shareholders, not to make friends with us or better our lives. Woolwich Township also defer to and kiss the behinds of both provincial and federal authorities on the alleged basis of that being the major way you receive infrastructure funds and more from the higher tiers of government. Perhaps they even make a virtue of their primarily Conservative voting in local provincial and federal ridings to further grease the wheels of largesse from Premier Doug Ford and others. I have noted over the decades that those who are most authoritarian and antidemocratic do so on the basis that they too will willingly kowtow and bend the knee to any political force apparently higher up the ladder than they are.  In other words they are not hypocrites at least. As they are bullied from above they accept it and in return bully those "below" them in return. They aren't hypocrites as much as bullies and cowards.

TRAC is NOT an example of public consultation. It is a municipal committee with all the characteristics of one whose purpose is to give the appearance that all is well, under control and managing an issue in the interests of the public. Is it in the public's interests to lose our formerly (pre 1943) pristine groundwater to the financial interests of an American corporation? Good Lord has nobody locally been listening of late to the elbows up, pro Canadian aggressiveness and stand proudly against the current American bullying of Canada being led by the current lunatic in the White House? Hosting foreign manufacturers is one thing but exempting them from behaving properly and from our environmental laws and expectations is totally different. Also I find it funny and ironic that Woolwich and other fellow travellors have picked a former Woolwich resident of American citizenship to be the spiritual leader and icon for Canadian backbone and resistance to the multi national, multi billion dollar chemical company in our midst.

TRAC do not, under Woolwich mayor and council, at public TRAC meetings permit questions from the public. Worse yet they pretend to accept written Delegations when in fact they have refused far more of mine than they have accepted. Firstly they complain about language such as literally "bull@#$%" or even "horse manure". Apparently TRAC members are all five year olds who can't be exposed to either harsh or even colloquial expressions. Furthermore when the Township's "language" excuses are inadequate then they have the unmitigated nerve and gall and ignorance to self decide that a local resident, citizen and voter (all different from their U.S. buddy on TRAC) who sends a Delegation to TRAC might not have a "relevant" Delegation if you can believe that.    

Here is my elbows up response to that shite. Flock off Woolwich Township . Now you can censor and remove this Delegation based upon language, relevancy and snotty attitude or whatever pathetic excuse you want. Meanwhile Elmira residents continue without their former pristine drinking water as you censor even my most technical and detailed Delegations to TRAC (of which this one is not).     

ELMIRA CLEANUP IS STILL LIKELY NEVER, DESPITE TRAC EFFORTS - (Jenn: My experts say that this post is both relevant and fit for any underage readers on TRAC)

 

Cullen Flanders (Onterris) advised TRAC at last Thursday's public meeting that the pump & treat system did what it was designed to do. My response is bull#$%^ unless it was specifically designed to give comfort and solace to the public as well as to prevent either lynching or tar and feathering of those guilty of poisoning men, women and children for decades here in Elmira. Oh gosh that is exactly what it was designed for. No nuetral, unbiased experts ever advised Uniroyal Chemical and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment otherwise. 

Mr. Flanders also suggested to TRAC listeners that his words were his professional opinion only and that there is no certainty in hydrogeology. I beg to differ.  O.K. I can certainly see instances where 100% certainty would be very difficult as to what is the exact location, depth, weight and composition of all subsurface DNAPLS in Elmira, Ontario. On the other hand the state of the science of hydrogeology certainly was advanced enough in the 1990s to determine that there were DNAPLS both residual and free phase on the Uniroyal Chemical site then as well as probably some off their site.

Mr. Cullen Flanders also suggested that chlorobenzene is an easier target to remove than NDMA. Really? Then how come even the vaunted pump & treat system can't do it?  How come chlorobenzene with much higher concentrations albeit still only in the parts per billion range is still well above its' drinking water standard of 80 ppb (parts per billion) in both the Municipal Upper and Lower Aquifers? Does he perhaps believe any Lanxess  and their consultants who still deny DNAPLS exist or ever have off the Uniroyal Chemical site? Varnicolor also had DNAPLS ( & LNAPLS) on their site including chlorobenzene. Don't they count just because the Ministry and Uniroyal lied about being the sole  contributer to the destruction of the Elmira Aquifers for decades?

Sebastian of TRAC advised that the public must be clearly advised that achieving the Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS) is not happening in the near future. I believe not ever until or unless the current folks in charge are all removed. Even then it is unlikely but slightly more possible. Tiffany Svensson (TRAC) suggested that TRAC and Lanxess were proposing a long term, new approach to remediation and agreed that achieving the ODWS is certainly not going to happen within the next four years. My response to that is this new approach needed to be done decades ago and if the amendments to improve biodegradation only work on dissolved chlorobenzene (versus chlorobenzene DNAPL) then it will be just as successful as rearranging the desk chairs on the Titanic was. If as I suspect the chlorobenzene DNAPL is now in the fractures of the Bedrock Aquifer then all bets are off.  

P.S. No sign of the MECP at last Thursday's TRAC meeting. Were they hiding quietly on Zoom? No idea and no loss wherever they were.

GEEZ I REALLY DON"T WANT TO SAY ANYTHING NICE ABOUT THE FIVE MINUTE WOMAN, HADLEY (Lanxess)

 

O.K. so here goes. She's nothing but a PR hack. She's a snake oil saleswoman and a con woman rolled into one. There I feel better. If I am going to congratulate her based on two things that I think I heard her say Thursday night then I needed to keep it in context with my very negative impressions of her over the last couple of years. 

Firstly recently I've been following TRAC closely via the on-line video/audio on Woolwich Township's website. Hence if I'm unsure what someone said the first time through I can back it up and listen again to be more certain. I'll have to wait until it's out on the Township's website for that. Before I get into what I believe she said I want to pass this along however. Thursday night I sit down and she immediately approaches me smiling with her hand out to shake mine. My immediate response to this wild, aggressive, extremely hostile and wholly inappropriate assault (nah it was none of that) was to say no thanks. She walked away. Damn if she wasn't back five minutes later with her hand out to shake mine again. She was still smiling which I interpreted as a tiger about to pounce and I said " What part of no did you fail to understand the first time?". Well that hardly seemed to faze her although she utterly failed to argue with me or reply rudely which I expected. She started to turn away and retrace her steps at which point I capitulated and said "Well I do at least appreciate your efforts." That was it. Fact is I no longer would shake hands with any MECP, GHD or Lanxess personnel not just her. Too many decades and too many lies, deceptions and manipulations.

The first serious thing I believe she said was that the contamination (chlorobenzene) at observation well CH-44 migrated from Uniroyal Chemical westwards onto the Nutrite property. Hallelujah ! She didn't say the key word DNAPL but as the bulk of dissolved chlorobenzene flowed south to south-west from the Uniroyal site her admission was significant. If it was. Again I will be listening to the video/audio when it's posted onto Woolwich's website.

The second item was when she was talking about DNAPLS and how difficult they were to find and see them. This was during Cullen Flanders (Onterris) talk and comments about secondary sources which he described as either "fingers" or "pipes". Hadley I believe stated that she thought that the concentrations (chlorobenzene) on site were high enough for DNAPL to be present. Hallelujah again!  These are the factual admissions necessary BEFORE  there is even the slightest hope of ever fully cleaning the Elmira Aquifers to drinking water standards. Again I will be checking the video/audio when it comes out for confirmation.

Lastly I have in the past suggested that TRAC are beyond hopeless. I have suggested that they are simply giving credibility to a hopeless cleanup process (pump & treat) etc. I have also vacillated and suggested that they are simply overmatched and outgunned by the experts and consultants hired by Uniroyal/Lanxess. That said they desperately need better informed and stronger members who will not defer to GHD/Lanxess when push comes to shove. A lack of historical knowledge is part of the problem despite the token presence of one very long time, former (non Canadian) community member. Sebastian asked Cullen Flanders whether or not NDMA which is dissolved in the Municipal Upper and Lower Aquifers was also in the Bedrock Aquifer or not. Mr. Flanders did not know so Sebastian asked the whole group if anybody knew. Stone silence. I waited. The silence grew with no responses until I finally, clearly spoke up from the gallery, in direct contravention of TRAC rules prohibiting public questions or responses. My response was of course NDMA is in the Bedrock Aquifer and has been  known and confirmed as such for decades. Good for Sebastian asking the question but quite stunning the lack of depth of important knowledge by all the TRAC members.  

SNAKE OIL SALESMEN OR SCHMOOZING CON MEN & WOMEN?

 

      A FORM OF BRAINWASHING?

I went to TRAC last evening in person for the first time in possibly a year or two. I had been watching these meetings for a while on Zoom until I could no longer stand that and thus have been simply playing the video of the meeting several days afterwards that is posted on the Woolwich Township website. Wow I have to give it to that pack of  prats they do hold a credible meeting. Last night they had yet another impressive individual who allegedly is an expert at either remediation in general or more likely biodegradation in particular. His name is Cullen Flanders, he speaks well and he is personable. Unfortunately he is also full of poo poo del toro. I see now how intelligent people like Sebastian and others can be taken in by these professional con artists.

His focus was chlorobenzene because apparently NDMA does not degrade via soil bacteria and microbes as readily as chlorobenzene. He stated similar to technical reports I have read that chlorobenzene is readily biodegradable both in shallow aerobic environments as well as in deeper anaerobic (low oxygen) environments.  So here is where the rubber meets the road. Why thirty-seven years after the start of the Elmira Water Crisis and about 57 years after outright dumping ended at Uniroyal Chemical do we still have chlorobenzene throughout the Elmira Aquifers well above drinking water standards? Clearly the buggars are holding information back. Maybe ongoing leakage from the still grossly contaminated former Uniroyal site continues. Maybe chlorobenzene DNAPLS either as free phase or residual continue to exist both on the Uniroyal site as well as beneath the town of Elmira itself, very slowly dissolving into the groundwater. Perhaps tailing and rebound are greater problems than we've been led to believe. Rebound simply means that adsorbed chlorobenzene held in low permeability zones (aquitards) is back diffusing from the aquitards into the adjoining aquifers. 

Regardless despite wildly optimistic claims of large percentages and large mass removal weights in the Elmira Aquifers the "cleanup" is stuck. Clearly removed NDMA and chlorobenzene mass is being replaced with new DISSOLVED  NDMA and Chlorobenzene mass from the sources listed above. The entire "cleanup" has been based upon off-site pumping & treating of groundwater with dissolved contaminants in it of which NDMA and chlorobenzene are but two. Source Removal has always been necessary and we the public have told those deaf, blind and stupid like foxes corporate polluters that for decades. Source removal both on and off the former Uniroyal site. That apparently costs a whole lot more money than professionals, con artists or not, who may or may not be fully informed themselves of important details regarding the Uniroyal site. 

Thank you Jenn Horndyl, Nathan Cadeau and Sandy Shantz for the now admitted Censorship of my informed citizen technical documents sent to TRAC members. I have been sending many of my Elmira Advocate Blog Posts to them since last December and only last night have a select few from July, August and September 2026 been formally passed on to TRAC members as citizen correspondence relative to TRAC's mandate and duties. I and other citizens have been censored, minimized and prevented from fully participating since September 2015 when Sandy and Mark Bauman removed CPAC in favour of the new RAC/TAG later replaced by TRAC.   

SO WHICH IS IT - FIFTY YEARS MORE TILL THE ELMIRA CLEANUP OR NEVER ?

Am I a psychic?  Can I accurately forecast the behaviour of politicians any more than of monkeys? Do I have some deep seated religious convictions that God will set us straight upon the path of environmental light and harmony? No to all the above. 

Citizens have been telling both Uniroyal Chemical and successors along with the Ontario Ministry of Environment (M.O.E./MECP) for decades that Source Removal of known contaminants is the proper route to go. Source removal both on the Uniroyal site as well as off it throughout the Elmira Aquifers where  decades of monitoring have told us that there are nearby sources whether DNAPLS or otherwise. Regarding on the Uniroyal site we've been basically told to go pound salt that they will do as they please and indeed they have. Regarding offsite source removal I went to CPAC in 2008 as a Delegation and presented to them the results of using a form of Source Removal in Cambridge known as ISCO or In Situ Chemical Oxidation. It was used at the Northstar Aerospace plant on Bishop St. for the purpose of breaking down and destroying a DNAPL chemical known as Trichloroethylene (TCE). It worked but everyone at CPAC from Uniroyal/Chemtura, M.O.E., GHD, Woolwich Twn. and the CPAC Chair Pat McLean and her sidekick Susan Bryant showed exactly zero interest. No intelligent questions along with no dumb questions. No followup, no interest, no progress or even hints that they would look seriously at it..

Lo and behold some years later Conestoga Rovers (CRA) and Chemtura announced that they were going to do a pilot test of this particular Source Removal methodology known as ISCO.  They would do it near pumping well W3R (beside Midas Muffler on Industrial Dr.). CRA did such a stand up job that years afterwards the new TAG Chair (2015) Dr. Richard Jackson publicly harpooned and condemned CRA for their Mickey Mouse efforts. I believe his words while not including Mickey Mouse did include amateur efforts and either sham or something harsher.

Whether or not cleanup is possible so many decades after thirty plus years of big talk, puffery and pump & treat is debatable.  Dioxins, DDT , PCBS and God knows what else are deeply embedded and bound to sub surface soils, silts, clays and likely Bedrock. Some are in mixtures of DNAPLS and some are on their own. NDMA and chlorobenzene are also bound not just in soils but also in fractured Bedrock which is highly exposed to the Municipal Lower Aquifer and all its' contaminants in a number of locations. Pump & treat is virtually useless to remove these undissolved, deep, hydrophobic contaminants. 

  As difficult, but maybe not impossible as this is, the real problem is human beings and their love of money. Polluters do not feel any moral imperative to spend that money cleaning up their messes no matter what they tell the public. Their loyalty is to themselves and their shareholders. Everyone else  are nothing to them. Essentially polluting corporations are sociopaths and need to be treated as such. As are far too many politicians. Our local politicians for sixty years have been Uniroyal enablers and many still are. The only way to even consider the remote possibility of truly cleaning our Elmira Aquifers to drinking water standards for ALL contaminants is to remove ALL current parties, bodies and authorities involved in the pretend "cleanup". Remove Lanxess, GHD, MECP, Woolwich Twn. and the Region of Waterloo from any involvement with future cleanup plans and work. They have all enabled Uniroyal and their successors and fellow travellors forever and the results are failure.        

UNIROYAL AND THE RISE OF SNAKE OIL SALESMEN - A REAL "CLEANUP" IS FIFTY TO NEVER YEARS AWAY

Snake oil salesmen are trained to pivot on a dime. Crush one lie and they can throw up two others a mini second later. Their oratorical skills are second to none. When really cornered they can simply make up "facts", data, quotes and phony references. Do not let them in your home, your office or your mind. They are insidious and are well paid by people with even fewer ethics than themselves and also with lesser talents for verbal manipulation and prevarication,

Turning on a dime includes twenty-five years of absolute, bold and bald lying by Uniroyal/Crompton/Chemtura, CRA/GHD, M.O.E./MECP publicly stating loudly and proudly that they would restore the Elmira Aquifers to drinking water standards by 2028. They knew full well from 1990 onwards that they were completely bricked if they told the truth. Their goal was to lie like dogs until their retirement and then let the second generation of snake oil salesman step up to bat. 

There are closer to one hundred chemicals in Elmira's groundwater courtesy of Uniroyal, Varnicolor Chemical and Nutrite/Yara. Likely there are more contaminant sources than that but we will stick with the proven ones for now. A number of these chemicals are DNAPLS (Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids). They sink to the bottom of higher permeability zones and slowly over decades to centuries dissolve their toxic components into the groundwater flowing by them. Other chemicals are just as toxic but either dissolve well with groundwater or less so but still produce toxic plumes beneath Elmira such as Benzene, Toluene, Xylene etc. Still others are "floaters" with densities less than water and they float on the surface of aquifers slowly dissolving their chemical components over time into the groundwater. Then of course there are even nastier problems such as DDT, Dioxins, PCBs and other heavy compounds which are hydrophobic. Uniroyal Chemical contributed DDT and Dioxins into Elmira's aquifers. Varnicolor had PCBs on both their Union St. site and buried on their Lot 91 property here in Elmira, Ontario. Varnicolor also had NDMA and chlorobenzene but likely in smaller quantities than Uniroyal. We will never truly know due to Ontario Ministry of  Environment incompetence and corruption.

The hydrophobic compounds do dissolve readily in solvents such as chlorobenzene, trichloroethene, benzene, toluene, chlorophenols etc. and move with them into the subsurface. They however have extremely low ability to dissolve into water/groundwater but nevertheless can do so up to and barely past their very low Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS). Hence their presence in the subsurface whether as components of DNAPL mixtures or as recrystallized DDT, Dioxins, PCBs do become extremely long term, ongoing contaminant sources to our drinking water just as the various DNAPL pools, puddles and residual blobs and ganglia are. 

The latest batch of snake oil salesman will have you believe that they can somehow make use of our now permanently tainted groundwater. They will pretend that maybe, just maybe they can magically extract water here and there for some kind of secondary uses. We would hope that meant for industrial cooling water for example versus something like using prior industrialized contaminated lands for nursing homes on the theory that none of the residents will live long enough to be poisoned by them. Or perhaps diluting our contaminated water and putting it into Waterloo Region's Integrated Urban System (IUS) for use by the thirsty folks over in Wilmot Township.