TAG WERE GIVEN AN EXTRA WEEK AND STILL HAVEN"T USED IT WISELY

Not only is their no public discussion or debate regarding the recent private soil samples but there isn't even any discussion (public) about the sediment samples found well in excess of the criteria in the Stroh Drain both on the Stroh property and also on the Martin property where the Stroh Drain, Ditch & Berm (SDDB) flows through on its' way to discharge into the Canagagigue Creek. The sediment samples, one of which was 28 times higher than the federal criteria, were collected by GHD Consultants on behalf of Lanxess Canada. At least half the reason I'm pounding the guilty parties, professional liars, fellow travellors and partners in pollution (with Uniroyal/Lanxess) about the recent soil samples is because they are doing what they do best which oscillates between DELAY and doing NOTHING with the Sediment samples from the bottom of the SDDB.. ...................................................................................................................... The TAG meeting scheduled for November 18/21 was cancelled and rescheduled for January 27/22. Apparently Sandy, Tiffany and TAG didn't have enough to talk about. BULLsh.t! That would have been an excellent opportunity to hear where TAG now stand on the refusal of Lanxess/GHD to do their duty and vigorously sample the soils (& sediments?) in and around the Stroh Drain (SDDB) especially at the north end where most of Uniroyal Chemical's toxic liquid wastes flowed off-site. TAG members need to get aggressive if gentle, subtle hints are not steering the TAG ship (Titanic?) in the right direction. You know it's bad when not only won't they sample properly/appropriately but they won't even discuss the minimal sampling that they have done. .................................................................................................... There is a RAC meeting scheduled for 5 pm. December 9/21. Likely it's another video conference which stunts discussion/debate both among themselves and certainly with the public. Should we all hold our breathe and hope that at least the SDDB Sediment results will be on the Agenda? TAG should have publicly discussed it first and then taken their conclusions to RAC. Maybe we'll find out that TAG have privately talked about it thus reducing yet again both public input and public participation. It's all a mystery controlled by the guilty.