Are there any guarantees of future prosecution? I would say no there aren't. The thing is politics which runs everything including our justice system one way or the other (just look at the U.S. Supreme Court with Donald Trump's idiot appointments) . Don't fret we too in Canada are stupid enough to let politicians make judicial appointments and we wonder why we get occasional idiots behind the bench (think Robert Reilly). Just to be specific yes I am talking about corruption prosecution in regards to the gross failure of the public interest being first and foremost in the decision making of our municipal, regional and provincial politicians surrounding the non-cleanup of our Elmira/Woolwich ground and surface water in addition to of the downstream Canagagigue Creek. Is it possible that at some point in the future there will be the political will to bring these corruption charges?
The last two days I've been discussing a letter sent to Tiffany Svensson (TRAC) from Luis Almeida (GHD) ostensibly answering five questions that TRAC have. Now as much as I have criticized TRAC for being too deferential and refusing to step up and verbally lay down some rules of engagement such as less lying from Lanxess and friends; I will say this. They are not totally oblivious to some of the issues being swept under the rug. Often times they will express concerns (as Sebastian has) and some times they will follow up. Unfortunately they have never drawn a line in the sand hence Lanxess, MECP and GHD have no respect for them.
Monday's Blog Post here went to TRAC plus some Woolwich Council members. Yesterday's Post went to TRAC, Woolwich Council and Waterloo Region Council. I didn't bother sending anything this time to the K-W Record or to the Woolwich Observer. I expect that today I will be looking at Luis Almeida's response to TRAC's Question #4 which is about DNAPLS . Whether I continue with the other questions is unlikely as I still have to comment on last week's allegedly public TRAC meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment