Saturday, September 18, 2021

DIFFERENT (2017) SPECIFICS REGARDING SEDIMENT RESULTS (NOT SOILS) IN STROH DRAIN

The following Table is a chart comparing the highest of four Sediment concentrations recently found in the bottom of the Stroh Drain by GHD on behalf of Lanxess Canada to their sediment concentrations found in their "2017 Canagagigue Creek Sediment and Soil Investigation". ................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................. .....................SEDIMENTS ................................................................................................................................. Location...........#.of.samples................................................. ................................................................................................................................ Northfield.Dr........29.....ALL.BELOW.2020.STROH.DRAIN.TEQ.(dioxin).of.(24.4.ppt) ................................................................................................................................ New.Jerusalem.Rd...92....Four.EXCEED.."...."....."...."....."....."....."..... ................................................................................................................................ Station.#21..........71.....Four.EXCEED.."...."....."...."....."....."....."..... ................................................................................................................................ Downstream.of......................................................................... Station.#20..........92.....Five.EXCEED.."...."....."...."....."....."....."..... ................................................................................................................................ Lanxess.Facility.....43.....Six.EXCEED..."...."....."...."....."....."....."..... ................................................................................................................................ ......................._____...______....................................................... ................................................................................................................................ Total...................327.....19................................................... ................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................ Therefore out of a total of 327 TEQ (dioxin) Sediment samples there are 19 Sediment results higher than the 2020 Stroh Drain highest result of 24.4 ppt. Hence the highest Stroh Drain TEQ (dioxin) Sediment result exceeds 94% of all the TEQ sediment results (including on-site Lanxess) from the 2017 Creek Investigation. This is a clear and indisputable, by honest reviewers, indication of the significance of the Sediment results found in the 2020 Creek Investigation done by GHD on behalf of Lanxess Canada.
Posted by at

3 comments:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2021 at 12:35 PM

    It is obvious that most of the chemical surface/overflow waste was diverted from the chemical companies property into the Stroh farm property as far as up to the Stroh drain so where has all those years of chemical contamination under the level of the sediment gone? I guess i am answering my own question...the chemical contaminants under the sediment must also be found and if not found in time some of the chemicals will get into the water tables! It is extremely suspicious that the Stroh family farm would have ever put up the chemical companies gross negligence??? They must have known that their well water was completely at rest at the bare minimum? or was it already too late when they found out and they became part of the coverup/gross negligence!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alan MarshallSeptember 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM

    My belief is that lots of the chemical contamination including dioxins/furans,DDT/PAHs remains in the soils. It is also my understanding that Uniroyal Chemical used to pay the elder and departed senior Mr. Stroh for crop damage along the property line with the chemical company.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousSeptember 20, 2021 at 2:45 AM

    In response, I do not think that Stroh Sr. would have kept quiet unless he was "completely compromised" by the chemical company! thus affecting Jr.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)