KEY QUESTIONS REMAIN EITHER UNANSWERED OR UNANSWERED TRUTHFULLY

There is very strong evidence that falls just short of the level that Lanxess, GHD and the Ontario Ministry of Environment seem to be insisting upon. Apparently anything short of a living eye-witness, of sound mind who took professional grade photos or videos of overland flowing waste waters from the east side pits (RPE 1-5) is their basic bottom line. Oh and this eye-witness needs to be still alive and a former employee of the company in a position of authority who knew exactly what he was shooting video of. Also preferably the photos/video would not be a one time occurrence but showed ongoing over decades flowing waste waters going south and then east onto the Stroh property by the current Stroh Drain. Lastly these photos and video would be from 1943 through until the pipelines stopped flowing in approximately 1969 or 1970. If such a witness could be found however who was willing to testify, Lanxess and friends would like to administer a senility test as well as question (with prejudice) this person's company loyalty. .......................................................................................................... The evidence will not meet those corporate and bureaucratic levels. Quite. It does however significantly surpass the civil criteria of "on the balance of probabilties". This evidence will be discussed next Thursday, November 26, 2020 at 6:30 pm. at the virtual TAG meeting. Any Woolwich resident can watch (no questions or comments allowed by fiat of the pretend mayor) this discussion by Dr. Sebastian Seibel-Achenbach through contacting Lisa Schaefer at Woolwich Township (lschaefer@woolwich.ca). This evidence showing Uniroyal Chemical wastewater flows directly onto the Stroh property right at the current location of the Stroh Drain, Ditch & Berm (SDDB), in my opinion even reaches the criminal level of "beyond a reasonable doubt". ..................................................................................................................... Criminal conduct. Interesting. The title above references either unanswered or dishonestly answered questions. I believe that some of the actions taken by Uniroyal Chemical between 1980 and 1991 may have surpassed the threshold necessary for a criminal conviction. Which specific charges perhaps should be left to a prosecutor.