Friday, September 4, 2020

I HOPE THAT COVID-19 MEETING PROTOCOLS DO NOT BECOME THE NORM i.e. (TAG Meeting Thursday September 10/20 at 6:30 pm.)

The TAG (Technical Advisory Group) meeting is a zoom meeting. In other words there will not be people sitting in Woolwich Council Chambers along with a live gallery of spectators. Folks will be at home on their computers for an on-line meeting only. Anyone who wishes to be allowed into the Zoom meeting (TAG meeting) needs to contact Lisa Schaefer (lschaefer@woolich.ca) by this Tuesday in order to receive an invitation to attend, albeit remotely. Lisa will e-mail you the link to attend as well as a password, I believe. Under Covid protocols this may be necessary or not but it would be difficult to sincerely criticize an abundance of caution right now. That said I am concerned that those manipulators among us (politicians especially) will abuse the situation because it certainly affords them much more control of so called "public meetings". ................................................................................................... Under New Business (3.1.1) it seems that both my e-mails to the TAG Chair (Tiffany) and TAG members will be discussed. Also interestingly so will the Toxic Time Bomb Documentary (3.3.3.). Along with the Record newspaper article about the film I also included a very funny cartoon poking fun at guilty parties who attempt to diminish their critics by referring to them as "conspiracy theorists". ................................................................................................... It would seem to me that in order to give TAG members the full picture, that Tiffany Svensson's self-admitted "...not as a robust response as you would like..." comment in her August 10, 2020 e-mail to me might have also been included for TAG members. Possibly I'm overreacting. Possibly they already have it. I don't know. Also I would suggest that any other recent e-mails on the topic would have been relevant to include if indeed there is going to be any discussion of my two e-mails. For example this might include Tiffany's e-mail chain (if it was an e-mail versus a phone or in person conversation) back and forth with Ramin Ansari (Lanxess) and his requesting and receiving a blank cheque agreement that TAG will no longer pursue investigation of the Stroh Drain, Ditch & Berm (SDDB) in exchange for a token couple (?) of sediment samples taken somewhere in the bottom of the SDDB. ................................................................................................. The devil is in the details and it is NOT up to Tiffany or any other single self-appointed individual to be negotiating or agreeing to anything regarding the cleanup of the Elmira Aquifers, the Uniroyal site or the Canagagigue Creek. That this has been going on behind the scenes for the last thirty years is exactly why I wrote my book and named names. All interested stakeholders, whether appointed by a corrupt municipal council or not, need to be at the table. Otherwise your precious "public consultation" will continue to be a sham and a facade giving credibility to professional liars. In the beginning all stakeholders were present albeit the powers to be assurred that they had lots of "friends" at that table in 1992.
Posted by at

3 comments:

  1. Ken SSeptember 4, 2020 at 8:03 PM

    Surprised you have not been banned, barred from attending. delegating, commenting on or presenting anything to or at these committees live or virtual. It appears they owe you nothing. Good luck getting any support the way you treat all involved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. alan marshallSeptember 7, 2020 at 10:24 AM

    Ken S ???? Not buying the name but good try.Over thirty years I've been attending, participating either fully or partially, and absolutely no Ken anywhere in sight or hearing.

    Regardless who peed in your cornflakes? You've never attended a single meeting in thirty years, you fake your name and then you spout irrelevant, to the posting, drivel. You are a yellow troll but I'll respond specifically to your comments anyways. I treat all involved generally far better than they deserve. Lanxess, MECP, fellow travellors and other assorted professional liars deserve to be treated with the utmost contempt. Appropriate behaviour is exactly how Dr. Richard Jackson treated them publicly at TAG meetings between September 2015 and the end of December 2016. He chastised, spanked and condemned them publicly. I am far more gentle publicly with them and if you were ever present you would know that. But your not there. You're simply an ignorant mouthpiece too yellow to ever put your real name here and expose yourself.
    P.S. the professional liars involved want it both ways. They want a captive, tame and powerless citizens' committee only so that they can pretend that there is real public consultation when the real decisions are all done privately, out of the public eye.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousSeptember 7, 2020 at 7:22 PM

    Hello Ken S. The key thing you must understand and respect is who works for whom! Mr. Marshall is peaceful compared to many of us property and business owners and capitalists who are simply sick and tired of our public servants being overpaid and under-worked and corrupted by their select privileged. Even the BLM_Antifa and GAIA socialists are weak compared to the aggression that the mainstream medium and small business owners/management could dish out when they stand their ground and or revolt against you guys personally and professionally !

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)