DECEIVING SUPERIOR COURT UNDER OATH AND KEEPING FALSEHOODS STRAIGHT IS SUCH DIFFICULT WORK

Sandy's Affidavit presented to Superior Court on July 23/15 contained the following possibly ficticious facts (ie. horse manure). Page 4, Paragraph 13. stated "On June 29, 2015 I provided the MECAC with a package containing a letter setting out my submissions to them and enclosing an updated Form and audited statements from Tim Adams, as well as a letter of explanation from Larry Shantz of Stair Travel Inc. which addressed a concern raised by Alan Marshall.". Sandy also enclosed as Exhibit D the Draft Minutes of that MECAC meeting which to date yours truly still has not formally received. Apparently certain priveleges accrue to being Mayor even in quasi legal proceedings.

All those present for the July 2/15 MECAC meeting saw Sandy's 30 page stapled (and hand numbered pages) package handed out at approximately 10:50 am.. I received them for the first time that day as well and commented harshly on the late delivery and was so recorded both by microphone /taperecording as well as in the Draft Minutes. MECAC members while recorded on tape also commenting on the late delivery were less so recorded in the Draft Minutes. Nevertheless all present including the media clearly understood that that package had just been delivered. Indeed Sandy even apologized for it's late delivery at the start of her presentation.

In hindsight I can see three possible scenarios. !) Sandy fudged to Superior Court in her Affidavit. 2) MECAC lied intentionally and profusely to the media and the public on July 2/15 and hence they both lied like dogs and had conspired ahead of time to do so. 3) O.K. this is a corollary of 1) ie. Sandy and MECAC told the truth on July 2/15 and indeed she handed it out then for the first time as everyone understood and stated. So either Sandy was part of a deception with MECAC on July 2 or she lied in her Affidavit to Superior Court on July 23/15.

Sandy's page 5, paragraph 16. Sandy tells the court "...after much discussion amongst the MECAC members, a decision was made by the MECAC to dismiss the Application of Alan Marshall.". That is total horse manure. Tom Jutzi of MECAC started the ball rolling by saying he wished to dismiss my Application for the following reasons... . Each MECAC member then followed individually giving their reasons immediately for dismissal. There was no discussion amongst them whatsoever. There was zero back and forth. It was an obvious predetermined outcome that each one pathetically tried to justify individually.

Sandy's Affidavit page 4, paragraph 12 stated "Upon being notified of that Application (ie. my June 16 Application for an Audit) and reviewing its contents, I was surprised and upset to realize that I may have failed to have my my financial statements audited when it was required and that there may have been errors with my Form or my campaign financing.". That statement to the court contrasts nicely with Sandy's claim in this week's Elmira Independent (currently online) that "...she had not sought an audit of her expenses until late May.". If the Independent story is correct then Sandy's statement to the court is false. Conversely if she told the court the truth why is she making false claims to the media?