I've been watching the ongoing online and elsewhere arguments and discussion regarding the federal government's proposed firearms confiscation program. I will not call it a "buyback" for two reasons. One the government never owned those firearms in the first place and secondly a proposed "buyback" that refuses to guarantee payment, whether full or partial value, is not a "buyback", it's a perverse lottery with one heck of a high ticket price that you are paying. Some citizens receiving compensation (full value or partial) and others not. I equate that with some kind of pyramid scheme and shame on our government for playing games with our legally purchased, legally possessed and legally used firearms.
There is also the issue of private property. Today the government wants to either forcibly physically or by threat take rifles and even some shotguns that they deem "assault style". I also do not agree or acknowledge that the majority of firearms on their #hit list are any such thing. In fact I am going to name them ..."asphalt style" because some of them are black in colour. Various different characteristics including colour, grip style, magazine type, caliber and method of operation are used to justify lumping around 2,500 makes and models as "asphalt style". I mean hey I've got just as much right to make up names for guns that our politicians do and in fact so do you. The difference is that I admit my name is ridiculous whereas Liberal politicians with a straight face will not.
I acknowledge the trauma, the stress, the abhorrence of violence and the anger that survivors of shootings have. I too, just like 99.5% of the rest of us, probably find it difficult to fully comprehend the depth of those understandable emotions. The issue I have is this. I have never shot anyone and hope to God that I never am put in the position to have to do so. That said literally half a century ago I worked part time as an armed Brink's guard and not to protect bags of money but to protect my partner actually had to unholster that gun (revolver) in public in the line of duty. It turned out to be a false alarm as two young and immature but adult males thought that intentionally faking a robbery would be funny. It was not and believe it or not they actually were shocked to be looking down the business end of a firearm. I too was shocked but followed my limited training and the situation was resolved without violence or injury.
Many thousands to millions of Canadian citizens are now being cast as potential murderers by our own government who know full well that that is ridiculous. I could understand our government tightening both training and supervision of hunters, target shooters, collectors etc. Just like having older seniors take bi-annual exams to ensure their safety behind the wheel of a car it should not offend them to be asked to prove safety competency and understanding on the firearms range. That makes sense but stealing Canadians' guns under the guise of public safety is insulting, disrespectful and dishonest. It may yet even prove to be unlawful.
No comments:
Post a Comment