Well I'm getting feedback all ready. The Record's reporter has very politely and professionally to date suggested that his errors aren't errors. He is so far beyond incorrect it's almost hilarious. That said I do believe that his multitude of errors are primarily based upon his sources. If you only talk to blind people you will find that their descriptions of suspects for example might be a little narrow and limited.
Woolwich Township are refusing to include any of my written work as Delegations to TRAC despite them being clearly indicated as such. Verbal Delegations are refused and my written ones as well. I'm told (in writing) that I am disrespectful in my writing. I can hardly believe it. Perhaps if I made a few amendments such as "Quigley, Almeida, Deal, Ansari, Este, Merriman, Stamm, Ash, Strauss, Seiling, Cadeau, Shantz, Bauman and so many others are wonderful human beings whose humanitarian efforts assisted world overpopulation being held in check." Is that a little too subtle for them? Not sincere enough? Too sarcastic?
The Record's article suggests that well E10 on Scotch Line, just around the bend and south of Elmira, with help from Lanxess might be able to resume providing drinking water. That well has NEVER provided drinking water to residents. At least that is what we've been told. When you are dealing with professional liars who knows.
The information provided by Susan Bryant in regards to milk quotas and contaminated milk from cows grazing on contaminated floodplains is shocking. Recently I was advised by a researcher (PhD) from Hamilton that the former Silverwoods Dairy at the north end of Elmira turned down milk from a number of farms along the downstream Canagagigue Creek . The milk had chemical smells and taste and they would not use it. That was in the 1960s. Then apparently in the 1990s Ms. Bryant was advised by the Region's Health Department that sampling and testing of milk from those farms was done improperly and poorly because nobody wanted the Mennonite farmers to lose their milk quotas. That was bad enough but I had been told by Susan Bryant back in the 90s that yes dioxins were certainly found in the milk but that they were "ubiquitous" in store bought milk hence not a big deal.
We are told in the article that "The pockets of contamination run downstream from the plant for hundreds of metres." This is also a falsehood or inaccuracy. Two of the bigger studies around 2020 plus the earlier ones in 1988 (OWRC) and 1996 (MOE) show that the contamination from DDT and dioxins extends the full five miles or 7.5 - 8 kilometres downstream all the way to the confluence with the Grand River. Most likely they could be detected in the Grand River as well if any testing had been done there at the time.
Again kudos to the Record and Terry Pender for publishing Workplace Safety Insurance Board statistics for the Elmira plant. Certainly chemical plants can be dangerous places to work. I should know as my father worked for Uniroyal for 25 years, approximately thirteen of them in Elmira. He then transferred to the Breithaupt St. plant in Kitchener and retired in 1980. I also worked for a whopping three months at the Uniroyal tire factory on Strange St. in Kitchener. My God but that place was a health disaster in its' own right and later studies proved that. I do wish that the WSIB statistics provided for Uniroyal/Lanxess in Elmira had actually named Agent Orange and DDT as causes of the compensation for some of the various health issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment