THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE CANAGAGIGUE CREEK IS BUT ONE MORE IN A LITANY OF PSUEDO SCIENTIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES IN ELMIRA, ONTARIO

 

In the past Conestoga Rovers (CRA), on behalf of Uniroyal Chemical, Crompton & Chemtura, were accused of writing Conclusions and Recommendations to reports that simply did not reflect the data and findings of those reports. In other words CRA would cherry pick items here and there within the reports of little significance and arbitrarily pretend to believe that they had far more weight and significance than they did. This was but one of their methods during DNAPL studies done in the late 1980s and early 1990s. They were actually accused by a consultant (CH2M HILL) for the Region of Waterloo of intentionally sampling for DNAPLS in the least likely locations to find them and then claiming "see there aren't any DNAPLS here."

Similarly monthly Progress Reports showing reduced on-site pumping might be acknowledged as a temporary mechanical breakdown easily fixed yet month after month and year after year the trend continued to decrease. Also there was never any acknowledgement of public verbal promises made by  Chemtura staff regarding the Tripling of off-site groundwater pumping in the monthly Progress Reports. Neither a tripling nor even a Doubling ever occurred and yet not a peep in those monthly reports as they bragged about exceeding their old off-site Target pumping rate by five or six litres per second (i.e. from 53 l/sec to 58 l/sec).

Now Lanxess continued that fine tradition with their Risk Assessment (RA) of the Canagagigue Creek. Apparently they can manipulate various assumptions throughout the RA process in order to conclude that despite many, many exceedances of health criteria for multiple contaminants both in Creek sediments and soils; not to fuss as the RA claimed "...no unacceptable risks...". There were also issues with floodplain soils as well and don't get me started on amateurish sampling of Creek sediments using shovels instead of professional core samplers. Along with these polluter self-serving failures were the locational sampling biases that failed to properly sample the majority of the five miles of downstream Canagagigue Creek all the way to the Grand River.

All in all unethical and dishonest junk science, psuedo science and wishful thinking science alone will not succeed. It also takes a combination of either stupidity, laziness or dishonesty by sitting politicians at the municipal, regional and provincial levels. Woolwich Township and Waterloo Region, fortunately for polluters, are blessed with an abundance of these. 

 

TYPO CLARIFICATION REQUIRED REGARDING METHOD DETECTION LIMITS HIGHER THAN HEALTH CRITERIA

 

Oops to err is Uniroyal like, to forgive divine. Gee I hope I haven't offended any Uniroyal lovers still alive in Elmira.  If I have then I guess I'll just have to live with it. By the way I bumped into former councillor Julie-Anne Herteis last evening.  She appears well and did not seem to still be mad at me for unkind things I may have said about her while she was a Woolwich councillor.  That's good because while sitting politicians are fair game, retired or those moving forward in life are not.

The typo is an easy one to make when we are discussing health criteria concentration numbers of toxins along with laboratory Method Detection Limits.  In yesterday's post I started off O.K. in my first paragraph stating that both the authors of a recent report and the Editor of Environmental Science magazine stated in their Summaries that "...analytical limits are far too high for detecting many chemicals, especially pesticides." Then however near the end of my second paragraph darn if I didn't reverse the word higher and use the word lower. Maybe that's not so much a typo as a brain fa*t? 

Here is an example. If you have a chemical with a health criteria concentration of  .5  ug per litre  (.5 ug/l) i.e. half a microgram per litre of water AND a laboratory Method Detection Limit however of 1 ug per litre ( 1 ug/l)  i.e. one microgram per litre then you have a problem because  the laboratory measuring the particular chemical can only measure as low as one microgram of that chemical per litre of water. Therefore the chemical can be above it's health concentration in drinking water (say for example three quarters of a microgram of chemical per litre of water)  however it is assigned a concentration of ND or Non Detect because the lab either don't have the equipment to measure that small or the appropriate process/method to do so. Also sometimes it can also be a matter of cost. Certain labs may charge extra for doing more expensive and difficult very low concentration analyses of a chemical.

Therefore this can be a legitimate limit on determining the toxicity of some chemicals in various mediums whether water, soil air etc. Or on the other hand it can be a very convenient method of weaseling out of showing exceedances of health criteria by toxic chemicals thus reducing expected cleanup costs. Unrepentant polluters lacking in ethics have become adept at this kind of gamesmanship just as regulators and credentialed public advisory committees have learned to look the other way in reports evidencing this kind of data. 

  

  

LIMITATIONS OF AQUATIC MONITORING ALSO LIMIT AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENTS

 

Last year a scholarly article was published in Environmental Science Magazine titled "Limitations of chemical monitoring hinder aquatic risk evaluations on the macroscale". This was a very large study of decades of monitoring data from across the United States.  Both the Editor and the authors included a Summary or Abstract if you will. Each essentially said that despite decades of monitoring, less than 1% of chemicals with possible toxic effects have the proper data required for risk assessment. The second statement from both parties was that analytical limits are far too high for detecting many chemicals, especially pesticides. Thirdly both advised that these limitations have biased risk perceptions and I would add risk assessments.

If none of this rings any bells than you have not been keeping up with the risk assessments done by Uniroyal Chemical/Chemtura and later on by Lanxess Canada who are only too keen not to spend another nickel on cleaning up the Canagagigue Creek after spending millions (?) on lobbying, bribing?, monitoring and persuading politicians and credentialed TAG/TRAC members that all is well.  I have long said that risk assessments are mathematical models filled with assumptions that can be favourably bought by polluter clients for a fraction of real cleanup costs. When as it turns out these monitoring data are also woefully incomplete including laboratory detection limits of toxic chemicals higher than their mandated health criteria; then what you have is not a risk assessment it is actually a get out of jail free card produced by well educated, intellectual prostitutes all pretending to rely on the "professionalism" of others. 

Mention is made of both DDT and Dioxins as are present in the Canagagigue Creek, courtesy of Uniroyal Chemical and Lanxess Canada, accompanied by warnings as to their enhanced toxicity.  

 

WONDERING WHY LUISA D'AMATO (K-W RECORD) HASN'T REPEATED HER COMMENTS ABOUT OUT OF SERVICE, CONTAMINATED WELLS

 

It was all of once. I have the article on a pile of articles dealing with the recent Waterloo Region Water Crisis.  Ms. D'Amato mentioned out of service wells including the Greenbrook Wellfield, Parkway and Woolner/Pompeii Wellfields. All three have past contamination problems and most likely present ones if they reactivate them. Recently I mentioned the benzene plume emanating from the Ottawa St. Landfill and drawn via pumping towards the Greenbrook Wellfield on Stirling Ave. near Homer Watson Blvd.  I believe that mention was also made years ago of 1,4 Dioxane being in some of those wells. Then Luisa herself had advised of contamination (TCE) at the Parkway wells and finally the river wells from the Woolner and Pompeii Wellfields have lots of solvents and goodies from the Safety-Kleen site formerly known as Breslube and Forsythe. 

Before continuing on about fixing the out-of-service wells listed above I want to mention Luisa's following statement in her Opinion piece in today's K-W Record titled "Why water pipeline to Lake Erie is not a good idea". That statement is "...that underground water supplies in Wilmot have almost been pumped dry in an attempt to keep supplies up." Have I missed something? Yes I understand that various private wells on the west side of Kitchener and or between Petersburg and Baden have been going dry. I had hoped/presumed that these wells water levels were being drawn down by Region of Waterloo and City of Kitchener excessive pumping but that is a whole lot different than suggesting that water supplies in Wilmot have almost been pumped dry. Good Lord if Wilmot Township which is also home to a significant part of the Waterloo Moraine is as a whole going dry then we are all in serious, immediate trouble.

Back to the out-of-service wells.  The Region of Waterloo are masters of the weasel worded descriptions as to why wells were shut down.  Unfortunately they are also masters of protecting and constantly insulating dirty, industrial polluters from the full consequences of their environmental negligence.  This means never pointing out which specific companies and corporations have mostly singlehandedly contaminated regional drinking wells. "Fixing" these wells does not mean new pumps, wellheads, piping etc. Nor does it mean drilling a new well beside the old one or even simply drilling deeper hoping to go by the contaminated sub-surface zones (soils). It would mean costly remediation possibly including excavation that should have been done decades ago and wasn't. 

Now all of this is moot if the Region are desperate enough to mix in solvent contaminated water with cleaner water in order to dilute it.  Oh but wait! They are that desperate. They've been doing that with the TCE (trichloroethylene) at the Middleton Wellfield in Cambridge for many decades. I believe there are also other wells in the Region that are "managed" in similar fashion. 

RUBBING OUR AUTHORITIES NOSES IN THEIR WATER FAILURES

 

The sentence below was on my latest e-mail in the Subject column sent yesterday to Woolwich Council, Waterloo Region Council, MECP, Lanxess, K-W Record, Woolwich Observer and TRAC . 

"Don't you wish you'd listened recently and decades ago to Esther, Richard, Henry, Viv, Ron, Graham, Dan, Sebastian & myself about Elmira's water ?"

There are and were other honourable mentions such as Sadi, Barb, Mary, Randy, Shannon, Kenneth, Pat, Chuck, Susan R., Steve and others who stepped up over the years and decades. 

The point of the quote above is that if the guilty parties (councils, MECP, Uniroyal/Lanxess ) had done their duty, both moral and legal, then we would have Elmira folks drinking Elmira water  and not taking water from the three cities via a pipeline. Unfortunately the guilty parties instead of looking ahead to the obvious time when our finite water supplies became stretched were more concerned with coddling a chemical company who provided some jobs and some tax money. 

Yes I could agree that Lanxess Canada are less culpable than Uniroyal Chemical who both buried toxic wastes,  lied about them, lied about remediation options, lied about DNAPLS, lied about Dioxins and just about everything else involved. Uniroyal and Chemtura also participated in pressuring Woolwich Council into who they wanted on UPAC, CPAC, TAG etc. as well as who they wanted off. None of the successor companies to Uniroyal have shown any interest in properly cleaning up Canagagigue Creek to their utmost shame. 

Citizens stepped up and informed themselves. They spent countless hours attending mostly dog and pony shows orchestrated by the polluter and Woolwich Council. Citizens read reports and made good suggestions the vast majority of which were either ignored or laughed at and treated with disrespect. Well you sh**heads congratulations! 

We have neither our groundwater restored nor the Creek properly cleaned up. That's all on you as you've run the show from day one.   

DEVELOPERS & HOMEBUILDERS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT PROFITS ($$$); IT'S ALL ABOUT HUMAN SUFFERING

 

Furthermore to my title above I must inform readers that I am smarter than Bill Gates, stronger than Arnold Schwarzenegger ever was, and better looking than either Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise at their best. In other words my title above employs literary exaggeration to the maximum.

Today's K-W Record carries the following article by Bill Jackson titled "Case being made to give small developments green light amid water shortage". The usual suspects are quoted by the reporter such as Larry Masseo and Ryan Mounsey. The former representing the Waterloo Region Homebuilders' Assoc. stated that his association is not in agreement with the region "in terms of the extent of the seriousness of the issue at this point,".  Nowhere in this article does his position seem to be backed with data supporting his opinion.  Mr. Mounsey also advises in one statement that he only works with developers "...that have small infill, gentle density housing with a modest - the smallest - impact" on water useage. Then he advises that these clients range anywhere from one lot to 1,400 units for a total of 2,500 units in the Region of  Waterloo. In my opinion adding 2,500 units (approx. 5,000 people ?) all requiring water on a daily basis is significantly exacerbating the water shortage. 

At the moment operational resiliency within our water system will not be restored until 2027. Until or unless that determination is changed the ban on new building permits should remain. This coming Wednesday regional council are to revisit staff recommendations to add capacity to the system from wells in Wilmot Township as well as to have regional council ask the province to halt water taking permits for golf courses, gravel pits and other large industrial/commercial enterprises. Depending upon the results of those two recommendations the ban on new building permits might need to be extended even further down the road. It is conceivable that neither Wilmot Township nor the Doug Ford government may be in the mood to comply to the requests.

INTERESTING CHOICES & OUTBURSTS BY PREMIER DOUG FORD

 

This post today is supposed to be about Susan Koswan's excellent Opinion piece in today's K-W Record titled  "Water and nature need protection from politics".  Essentially the politics she is describing are the politics of our current Conservative government led by Doug Ford. I am of two minds right now. Or maybe even three or four. Yes Doug Ford and his merry band have been awful for the environment and Ms. Koswan  clearly describes his gaffes, errors and plain bad thinking and behaviour on the environment file. 

Meanwhile back on the first page there is Doug Ford blustering about how a homeowner recently shot one of four home invaders. Four on one in the middle of the night is hardly a fair fight especially as at least one of the home invaders was caught on video with a gun in hand. Undaunted the homeowner shot one of them and they all fled. Doug Ford meanwhile was quoted as saying that the homeowner should have shot him a few more times for good measure.

Doug of course is pandering to the public's discomfort with firearms legislation that essentially for decades has stated that citizens may own guns to shoot unarmed animals and or harmless paper targets that have never attacked anybody. But by God any use of a firearm to defend oneself from physical attack is beyond the pale. Under no circumstances are Canadian citizens supposed to have the right to readily and quickly defend themselves from robbery, assault or worse. Being even blunter I expect that our police, prosecutors and courts will cheerfully advise women that mere rape also doesn't justify shooting someone. For our justice officials that would be a case of using disproportionate force to defend oneself. Well! Let me simply suggest that if any of either Harvey Weinstein's or Frank Stronach's alleged victims had been armed, their criminal activities would have been nipped in the bud.

So I like Dougie for standing up to the stupidity of our judicial system and the temerity of all participants within it to expand the legal rights of citizens to defend themselves from unprovoked attacks. At the same time I am appalled at his biased and self-serving environmental behaviour in this province. He is a one man environmental wrecking machine and needs to be cut down (only at the polls please).

WATERLOO REGION RESIDENTS ARE LONG OVERDUE FOR A DIOXIN REVIEW

 

One of the terms used in past reviews and studies concerning dioxins has been that it is a non threshold contaminant. In other words there simply is no safe level of exposure for human beings. Now that is very concerning particularly when one realizes that human beings throughout the world have already accumulated body burdens of dioxins. Amounts mentioned thirty plus years ago were in the 4 to 6  picograms  range per day exposure for Canadians. At the same time that Canada had a guideline maximum of 10 picograms per day per kilogram of body weight, our American cousins had a guideline of only .006 picograms.  Now it is entirely possible if not probable that either concentrations or body burden guidelines have changed since 1994. Personally I have found the silence in the media on the matter to be nearly deafening.

It is also possible that up to date science may very well have decided that the only safe guideline number is zero especially for vulnerable populations. This would include pregnant women, young children and those with compromised immune systems. Regardless it is next to impossible for citizens to either stop or reduce their exposure to these now ubiquitous contaminants. While the simplest expression of the source of dioxins is chlorinated substances being burned the fact is that they are in our food, water and the air we breathe. Yes polluting industries such as pulp and paper  as well as chemical companies are major contributors but there are many more including hospital and municipal incinerators.  

Instead of studying, monitoring and sometimes ignoring them as we have done for the last thirty-six years here in Woolwich Township (Elmira), what is needed is proper removal. It can be done but for profit industries are willing to sacrifice human life in exchange for millions of dollars and our local, regional and provincial politicians are only too willing to accommodate them. Now lets be clear.  No politician will ever admit to this. It's about them finding ways to weasel word their way around the reality. It's about them finding ways to disparage the science, the data and if necessary the scientists themselves. Isn't it ironic that unqualified, sometimes dyslexic, sometimes illiterate and most times mathematically challenged politicians when pressured to stand up for their own constituents will run and hide behind criticism of those far more qualified than they to come to conclusions and make decisions.     

PROMISES & OTHER LIES BY UNIROYAL CHEMICAL/SUCCESSORS AND THE MOE/MECP

 Jeff Merriman promised us six litres per second of on-site Municipal Aquifer pumping in order to maintain hydraulic containment and stop off-site migration of Uniroyal's groundwater. For a number of years the total from two or three on-site pumping wells was around 5.3 to 5.5 litres per second. Close although not quite there. In November 2012 after Conestoga Rovers admitted that their off-site pump & treat wasn't going to complete the job by 2028, they and Chemtura promised a TRIPLING of the volume of off-site pumping. Oddly no mention was given of increasing on-site pumping at the same time in order to avoid the increased off-site pumping from dragging on-site contaminated water along with it as the groundwater levels were lowered off-site. That in hindsight should have been our first indication that we were being lied to yet again.

Since about 2017 the on-site municipal aquifer pumping  has been slowly dropping until it's at about 3.3 to 3.6 litres per second. As serious as that is, the problem is only exacerbated as the off-site pumping has indeed been increased. Now that increase certainly never achieved  even a DOUBLING much less a TRIPLING of the off-site volumes from 2012 (around 53 l/sec) as promised.  It did increase however to often achieve 65 l/sec and occasionally as high as 70 or 71 l/sec. This has been going on for years now with nobody including TRAC so much as raising questions directly about increasing off-site pumping while lowering on-site pumping.  This practice we were advised for years while on CPAC absolutely would cause the Uniroyal site to lose hydraulic containment and further increase off-site contamination. 

There has never been an iron clad test to prove to citizens that hydraulic containment was being kept. Promises and assurances from proven liars that groundwater levels here and there "prove" containment aren't worth the paper they are or aren't written on. More, louder and shriller exhortations of integrity and honesty from Lanxess Canada and or the MECP also mean less than nothing. They and their predecessors have never stopped lying to us.  

SO WHEN EXACTLY DID UNIROYAL/CROMPTON/CHEMTURA/LANXESS THROW IN THE CLEANUP/REMEDIATION TOWEL?

 

Or put differently was there ever a time when anybody in authority seriously believed that they had a viable plan to restore the Elmira aquifers to drinking water standards? By those in authority I'm referring to the Min. of Environment (MOE/MECP), the four companies listed above, Waterloo Region or Woolwich Township. These are not idle or spurious questions. Hindsight being 20/20 gives one an entirely different flavour and view of what has gone on. Certainly over the intervening decades there have been significant changes in the surface water of the Canagagigue Creek, the air over Uniroyal/Lanxess and the groundwater beneath the town.

At one time decades ago the Ontario Ministry of Environment was derided as the Ministry of Lumps and Colours in reference to surface waters in the province. In other words the Ministry were satisfied the moment rivers and streams stopped routinely being discoloured by industry  discharges and even solids and sludges being dumped into them. Yes the Canagagigue has far fewer solvents and dissolved toxins in them than they used to have courtesy of Uniroyal Chemical. Unfortunately there has been an extremely limited reduction in Persistent Organic Pollutants with the likes of DDT and dioxins topping the list. These are present whether as suspended sediments (as Dr. Dick Jackson thundered repeatedly) or even as low concentration dissolved contaminants in the water.

The bad old days even as recently as 1998 to 2000 when air discharges sent the "Duke St. rowdies" out of town in the middle of the night seeking refuge  hopefully are done forever.  To many including myself these air discharges simply reinforced our belief that the company (Crompton) were long on talk and awfully slow on action including spending money and time to remove the biggest and baddest air discharges.

It would appear that both the concentrations of contaminants as well as the volume of the various plumes underneath Elmira have been reduced. To what effect however? If the two most obvious targets, NDMA and chlorobenzene still aren't at drinking water standards do you think any of the dozens to hundreds of others are? 

If one has ready access to the on and off-site pumping records as I do then it is obvious that years ago the various polluting companies began cutting back on their pumping and treating volumes just when  they most needed to increase them and when they had publicly promised to do so. They did no such thing nor did they even seriously try to. It was all a scam simply buying time and wasting time as they and their consultants talked and bamboozled both lay citizens and even educated, credentialed members of RAC, TAG and TRAC into deferential submission. The last gasp chance to turn the ship around died in 2015 under the pathetic and woefully uninformed guidance of Sandy Shantz at the Woolwich Township helm. Frankly success was already in huge jeopardy but her embrace of all pleas and lamentations from Chemtura and the Min. of Environment sealed the deal. Lots more talk and lots more hot air but it's all been window dressing and less. 

THE K-W RECORD ARE ALL OVER THE WATERLOO REGION WATER CRISIS

 

Frankly I am impressed. I have very good reason to be angry with the Waterloo Region Record (aka K-W Record) but geez it is difficult to stay mad at the twits when they are currently so fulfilling their mandate of keeping the public informed on serious issues. Take note of that Woolwich Township. Decades of bias towards filthy polluters may never be forgotten but it could be mitigated possibly even to the point of forgiveness. Of course that requires some immediate, heartfelt changes in both attitude and behaviour on your part. 

It appears as if the Record along with others are embracing the over pumping of our groundwater as fact not possibility. The Record once again in today's article titled "52 billion litres of water too much, and not enough" goes through the litany of errors and miscalculations of water supply and demand by the Region's water staff.  It is almost to the point of slapstick comedy if it weren't so serious. Yes both developers and home builders' groups are still on the bandwagon of it's not really a case of too much growth or of water supply. They are all too willing to throw both regional staff and councillors under the bus in calling the crisis a "management issue". 

Personally I can embrace both the idea of a finite water supply as well as to a certain extent management issues.  The particular "management issues" that I find so offensive are the lying and blatant disinformation over a period of decades. Items such as the Inter Urban System (IUS) supposedly allowing water from anywhere in the Region to flow wherever it is needed has turned out to be nonsense. Allegedly that is, because I can no longer trust that the Region are telling us the truth. Also the fact that they have lied to Wilmot Township for years as they've been taking their water surreptitiously for use in the cities while the water table has dropped significantly in parts of Wilmot.

I still would like to see both past and current groundwater elevation data from throughout the various moraines and aquifers to confirm that the Region have been inappropriately  "mining" those aquifers and significantly lowering the water levels.   

LOCAL MEDIA COMMENT ON REGIONAL COUNCIL'S DECISION TO HIRE OUTSIDE EXPERTS TO STUDY REPORTING & COMMUNICATIONS ON WATER ISSUES

 

Overall Luisa D'Amato seems pleased with the direction that the Region are taking by hiring an outside consulting firm.  While she does state that "This is a good start." she has a number of suggestions to make it even better. That said what I noticed was her very first sentence in which she suggested  "Finally we may get some answers to the question of why the water supply crisis we are in was allowed to happen, and how the news came as such a complete shock." Hence I was a little taken aback to read that the final report is due within a year. A year !  I'm sorry but that for me does not jive with "Finally we may get some answers...". Citizens deserved honest and confirmed answers a couple of months ago not hypothetically a year down the line. Is this simply more bureaucratic and political gamesmanship to delay and deflect our attention?

Ms. D'Amato raises good points and suggestions. She would like to know why both the Mannheim treatment plant for Grand River water and the Greenbrook pumping station are still in disrepair. Why weren't both of them repaired promptly? Somewhat oddly to me she hasn't repeated her comments about the possible rehabilitation of the Parkway Wellfield or the Woolwner/Pompeii wells along the Grand River . Could she herself have signed some sort of NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement) with the Region? Perish the thought! She is a professional reporter.

Ms. D'Amato also advises that here in Ontario we had a public inquiry after the following major public system failures namely the Walkerton water crisis, the light rail debacle in Ottawa and the fatal mall collapse in Elliot Lake. Oddly enough somehow the 1989 Elmira Water Crisis with its' now failed remediation never was subject to a public inquiry. That was ridiculous then and even more so now when we realize how much more desperately Elmira's water is needed.

WATERLOO REGION COUNCIL DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST: DEFERRING DECISIONS, DELAYING & HIRING FRIENDLY CONSULTANTS

 

I am curious as to how many citizens don't know that the main purpose of so called third party consultants is to do almost the same thing as public consultation does. That is to give a veneer of credibility and respectability to Council decisions that are more likely to be politically motivated than factually motivated. Indeed it is possible sometimes to have an overlap between good politics and good governance.  Just not often enough.

Today's K-W Record has an article by reporter Bill Jackson titled "Council orders water capacity review".  In fact that's a bit of a misnomer. The review being ordered is a review of water capacity reporting and communicating processes. That's a whole different beast.  Councillor Doug Craig suggests that it won't be about assigning blame. Well darn what's the fun in that? We the citizens and paying taxpayers want names. We want to hang people in effigy. We want accountability and let the chips fall where they may whether it be politicians or staff. We want guilty, incompetent or negligent people turfed whether from regional council or regional staff. Hmm it makes me suspect that this review may be no more than a glad handing exercise. Put some obvious reporting triggers onto paper as well as even more frequent sending of memos upstairs to staff supervisors to continue being ignored while publicly praising the consultants and everybody else involved. Isn't that generally how politicians work?    

The request to the province to put a pause on new or expanded water taking permits has been deferred to March 25/26 ostensibly. There was also discussion around a Lake Erie pipeline. You know that that water will most likely be treated at least enough not to cause immediate, debilitating pain or disease.  I mean right now our water, food and air have already been horribly contaminated and compromised albeit within carefully selected parameters. Did you know that Health Canada and Ontario Health are routinely lobbied for reduced health criteria by business and industrialists? To clarify, by reduced health criteria I don't mean lower concentrations of contaminants, I mean less stringent standards allowing higher concentrations of toxic chemicals in our food and water and air.

Along with the Lake Erie discussion there was also concern expressed by some regional staffers (Kenneth Brothers) who suggested that "We have to be very cautious in that we're vulnerable in terms of the aquifer restrictions.".  I believe that this information is the most important to have as soon as possible. Until the Region know absolutely the water levels of the various aquifers in and around the Waterloo Moraine ( & others) it is impossible to know what long term sustainable pumping amounts really are.   

FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE FAILURE TO REMEDIATE THE ELMIRA AQUIFERS

 

I did mention yesterday that there were both LNAPLS (light non aqueous phase liquids) as well as DNAPLS  (dense non aqueous phase liquids) on the 62 Union St. Varnicolor Chemical site. Those alone could have destroyed any chances of cleaning up the Elmira Aquifers either solely or mostly with pump & treat technology.  This is because both LNAPLS and DNAPLS have a low solubility in water and tend to either float on the surface of ground and surface water (LNAPLS) or at the bottom of aquifers (DNAPLS) and only slowly dissolve into the water  over a period of decades or even centuries. Hence they are an ongoing almost never ending source of contamination in the subsurface.

Add to that the recent statements (yesterday's Blog posting)  in which Jesse Wrighte of Arcadis Inc. advised TRAC, the MECP, the Region and the Township of multiple nearby Varnicolor Chemical companies who used chlorobenzene in their processes. How extraordinarily strange that that little tidbit took 35 years to be released publicly. Also extraordinarily strange that a solvent recycler like Varnicolor Chemical allegedly never used and abused chlorobenzene on their site as they did virtually every other solvent they dealt with. That is strange because chlorobenzene is a very common solvent both used as an intermediary in production processes (i.e. Uniroyal Chemical) as well as with paint manufacturers and auto body shops as well as car manufacturers all of whom were clients of Varnicolor Chemical. Does anyone really wonder why I have been calling out those in charge of our failed cleanup as dishonest swine or worse?

Then there is the incredible attempts by the Ontario Ministry of Environment (M.O.E./MECP) to cover up the illegal activities of Varnicolor Chemical. Their efforts stopped at nothing. They lied about everything. But for two things they might have gotten away with it. Firstly despite being ordered years previously to erect fences around Lot 91 they never did. Good fences make good neighbours but I and others had no qualms about gathering evidence including video and photographs which constantly refuted the Ministry's lies. Then there was my inside person at Varnicolor. I did hear at one point that Severin suspected his office manager Jeanette. I hope that wasn't so because she was a loyal and dedicated employee unlike myself who found more than a couple of employers over the decades to be absolute a**holes with Severin Argenton being front and centre.  My inside person tipped me off constantly as to what was happening or going to happen at Varnicolor next. This even included the Glen McDonald fiasco in which he was fired by the Ministry of Environment and charged by the Crown for tipping off Mr. Argenton about an upcoming police and Ministry raid of his property (62 Union & Howard Ave. property). 

Lastly of course is the problem of low concentrations of dioxins dissolved in Elmira's groundwater despite all howls and protests by our favourite polluter to the contrary.  I mean seriously after 36 years of delay, deception, manipulation and lying only fanatical, pro business, left hating, anti communist, anti socialist ideologues would put weight on any gross polluters' opinions. Until PROVEN otherwise I have to ask exactly how keen are pro NDMA drinkers going to be about including even low concentrations of incredibly toxic  2,3,7,8 TCDD (dioxin) to their morning coffee. 

So go ahead and mix Elmira water with the low level solvents and stuff already in our Integrated Urban System (IUS) and watch another social problem of too few workers supporting too many seniors also disappear, me included.

  

IS VARNICOLOR CHEMICAL THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM REMEDIATION WISE?

 

Has something new occurred? Have our authorities (Woolwich, Waterloo Region, MECP) in their infinite and never ending thirst to share knowledge with the public, released something? Well no, not exactly. Here's what we have however. About a year and a half ago (Sept. 2024) after a TRAC meeting in which Alan Deal of GHD, on behalf of Lanxess Canada, mostly falsely denied a relationship between Varnicolor Chemical and DNAPLS (Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids); the Minutes of the meeting were finally released. Lo and behold in writing was the decades late, astounding revelation that the 84 Howard Ave. site was responsible for six different chlorinated solvents (not chlorobenzene) in the Elmira drinking water aquifers. Now 84 Howard Ave. is simply the newer address of the former Varnicolor Chemical site which encompassed both the Union St. properties and the Howard Ave. property. Hallelujah !

Skipping to the third revelation also from a TRAC meeting back in September 2025 we have admissions from a consultant (Jesse Wrighte/Arcadis)  that there were multiple companies and locations using chlorobenzene (chlorinated solvent) near the corner of Union St. and First Ave. Again this revelation was approximately 35 years after the fact which included an alleged Five man team from the Ministry of Environment which toured Elmira looking for industries which could have contributed to the shutdown of the south wellfield in Elmira. 

This third revelation likely was to explain again a decades late proven fact that there was free phase DNAPL at OW57-32 (R) beside the Howard St. Water Tower. I had long suggested that this chorobenzene came from one of three sources namely Varnicolor, Borg Textiles or all the way from Uniroyal Chemical. None of my suggested sources however were politically correct for the liars and stakeholders in charge of the cleanup.   Nevertheless again in the Minutes of the Alan Deal TRAC meeting of September 2024  which he attended is the second revelation that the DNAPL near pumping well W4 and the Howard Ave. Water Tower was finally dissipated/dissolved and allegedly thus reducing it's contamination of nearby groundwater.

Since then I have reviewed both newspaper articles and most importantly photos of the extent of the contamination from Varnicolor Chemical at both their 62 Union St./Howard Ave. location as well as from Lot 91 at the east end of Oriole Parkway. The photographs of the remediation of the 62 Union St. / Howard Ave. property are interesting especially in hindsight.  These photos plus the 2016 Risk Assessment of the site by Peritus Environmental further combined with the now long admitted failure of the Elmira groundwater cleanup spell out an interesting hypothesis. 

There were both LNAPLS (Light Non Aqueous Phase Liquids) and DNAPLS on the Varnicolor site. There was a calculated and concerted illegal dumping operation underway at both the Union St. site AND at Lot 91. Initially the Min. of Environment only laid paperwork pollution charges against Varnicolor. It took the local media's clamoring to get those upgraded to actual pollution of the natural environment charges and later convictions. I suggest that Varnicolor Chemical whose cleanup has not been followed by citizens or activists or the media may well be the elephant in the room which has exacerbated the difficulties in cleaning the Elmira Aquifers, especially by pump & treat technology mostly on it's own. In fact the remediation tidbits that we do have (i.e. a shallow aquifer pump & treat system only) actually point to a grossly inadequate cleanup considering the volume, the depth and the characteristics and components of the liquid wastes dumped at the site over decades. 

In order to protect the Min. of Environment (M.O.E./MECP) from further embarrassment, humiliation and public contempt the province of Ontario denied and covered up the extent of gross contamination at Varnicolor Chemical, the second largest polluter in Elmira, with Nutrite/Yara the third (ammonia).      

AND THERE IT FINALLY IS... THE MONSTER FROM THE GREEN LAGOON

 

Of course I'm referring to the long proposed Pipeline from the Green Lagoon otherwise known as Lake Erie. Is there anybody who doesn't know about the prevalence of toxic blue-green algae on the surface of our smallest and shallowest Great Lake? Today's K-W Record has an article by Bill Jackson titled "Waterloo Region's pipeline possibility". For me having lived for almost a decade in West Montrose it's almost emblematic of the long threatened West Montrose Dam. At one time that was the bogeyman that hung over local residents wondering how badly their beautiful valley, covered bridge and lush farm fields would be destroyed.

Darn but you know the old saying that for a carpenter all problems can be solved with a hammer and for an engineer if it's not broken then you simply haven't built it yet. Build it and when it breaks fix it sort of attitude. Today's Record interviews both a former public works director as well as Kevin Thomason, vise-chair of the Grand River Environmental Network (GREN). Both are smart individuals but with totally different approaches to Waterloo Region's Water Crisis. Mr. Anderson with a  public works background is very big on class environmental assessments. It almost seems to me that he views the Class EA process as somewhat magical and without bias. Being from Elmira I've lived through a few Environmental Assessments now and I can tell you that depending on many factors they can and are manipulated beyond belief. He who is paying the shot calls the tune and that's exactly what has happened here with two very local Environmental Assessments.

Mr. Thomason of GREN however does not believe that blasting right of ways and cutting through forests and farm fields is the best way to solve our alleged water problems. He lists numerous less invasive and less expensive options in this article that can be done right here in Waterloo Region versus taking water from Lake Erie.

Alleged water problems is an interesting turn of phrase. We the public are still waiting for documentation that either proves or disproves the alleged low water levels in our major aquifers such as the Waterloo Moraine. Also it is rather convenient how often dishonest politicians such as our Woolwich Township mayor invent a crisis in order to implement a totally asinine solution as was done in 2015 . Chemtura and the Ministry of Environment (MOE/MECP) were crying about the new vigorous and informed Chemtura Public Advisory Committee (CPAC) holding them to account and failing to treat them with the deference and reverence that they were used to. 

Is it possible that this water crisis has been invented to push the multi billion dollar engineering solution of a Lake Erie Pipeline? Or is the crisis real? Maybe it could be part of each? Maybe we are currently in trouble but the fixes are right here within the Region's boundaries as suggested by Mr. Thomason. 

TIME DOES NOT ERASE LYING & DECEPTION

 

It is far too easy in an uneven power relationship for the weaker party to tend to forget past wrongs especially if the present is tolerable. To a great extent I wonder if that is one of the reasons that we have had three sales of Uniroyal Chemical in Elmira since around 2000.  It is very difficult to saddle the new company/new owners with the sins of the past including the almost never ending blatant delays, deceptions and lying.  This is especially so when the allegedly neutral citizens are also repeatedly turning over on the various advisory committees whether UPAC, CPAC, RAC, TAG, or TRAC.   Some of these new "citizens" are also no longer from Elmira which again makes it less likely that they would have personal memories of past promises and commitments. Finally too many have connections with the environmental community as consultants for private companies who tend to deal with the Ministry of Environment as well as municipal and regional governments. This includes engineering companies who have done engineering work for both Woolwich Township and the Region of Waterloo.

I have recently been reviewing old newspaper clippings both of the Esther Thur collection at the Wilfred Laurier University Archives as well as others. It is truly shocking as well as outrageous how many times Uniroyal or successor companies begged for time claiming that they were already addressing a problem or just getting ready to start to do so.  We at UPAC or CPAC would give them that time simply never to see the item ever on the Agenda again or in some watered down version. This of course was aided by local politicians arbitrarily removing members and appointing their own uninformed buddies, sycophants and deferential "experts" with skin in the game who did not want to rock the boat.

Elmira has become the poster child for public consultation abuse. It is also the poster child for corporate abuse of citizens aided and abetted by local politicians whether municipal, regional or provincial. It's also funny how polluting industries seem to have support from both Liberals and Conservatives. Gee I wonder which two parties are the biggest benefactors of corporate donations ? 

THE HUMAN CONDITION: DOES STATUS & AUTHORITY ENGENDER STUPIDITY ?

 

Oh boy but that title above is a strong statement. Can I back it up? Well first American politics. How about George W. Bush and the non-existent "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq if I've named the correct President Bush for that idiocy. Or how about President Trump in all his glory? Nine months ago he bragged that Iran's nuclear ambitions were obliterated after bombing the country. Now he's trying to obliterate the rest of the country with claims that their nuclear program is alive and well and they are a threat to the U.S. and Israel. 

Recently our Waterloo Region councillors (& staff) have put their amazing intelligence and common sense up for debate by somehow forgetting to include infill development into their calculations of water demand. They have also been secretly  pumping water from Wilmot Township to the three big cities despite an agreement not to do so without discussion and agreement by Wilmot Township.

Now even closer to home we have the idjits on the Waterloo Region District School Board  (WRDSB) who attacked teacher Carolyn Burjowski for her comments and opinions on age inappropriate books for very young students. These comments were made as a properly registered Delegate to the WRDSB and as the courts have made clear since were done so in accordance with all rules and procedures. 

Today's K-W Record carries an Opinion piece by Luisa D'Amato referring to a "witch hunt" by Waterloo Catholic trustees. Thank God our Catholic Board has stepped up to share the limelight and glory with our public board. This dispute went right to the Ontario Superior Court who determined that the Catholic Board's decision was "unreasonable and must be set aside." I mean maybe this is a sign that our courts  prefer to make decisions based upon law and reasonableness themselves. Who knows about that for sure but the facts as exposed by Luisa D'Amato certainly indicate that the trustee Kathy Doherty-Masters absolutely did not violate the trustee's Code of Conduct as alleged. 

What then have we learned? Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Nah we already knew that. Maybe it's that mostly dishonest and or self-serving people are attracted to getting elected to positions of authority? Possibly. Or maybe it's that voting citizens are far too easily swayed by appearances (looks), names and other trivial characteristics. That's a big one and doesn't make Democracy look so hot sometimes. 

WRDSB TRUSTEES GET THEIR ASS*S KICKED BY THE K-W RECORD

 Well to be specific by Luisa D'Amato. This takes me back decades when she was on the Education beat and used to lay them out like bowling pins, on a regular basis. I gained an immense amount of confidence and respect for her in those days.

In Ms. D'Amato's February 25,, 2026 Opinion piece she makes it very clear that leaving all control of education in the province's hands is not a good thing. She however clearly understands and believes that the current system of trustees is badly broken. She is correct and while she does suggest that there were/are? a surprising proportion of trustees with ties to the Waterloo Region & District School Board (WRDSB) as either former teachers or spouses or relatives, she does not specify exactly what the problem there was. Perhaps just that the trustees should better represent a more diverse group of citizens and parents .

I do have one strong disagreement with Ms. D'Amato's opinion however. In fact I'm wondering if she was speaking with tongue firmly in cheek when she suggested that the Region of Waterloo could step up and become the local board of education similar to their duties as the local board of health. Firstly we are daily and publicly, thanks to Ms. D'Amato, Terry Pender, Bill Jackson etc., learning exactly how inept and incompetent the Region of Waterloo staff and councillors are due to the region wide water crisis.  Secondly those of us living in Elmira never received the support necessary from the board of health for our own Elmira Water Crisis .So much more could have and should have been done by them to counteract the polluter and his tame regulator's (MOE/MECP)  false reassurances and minimization of health problems.

LUISA D'AMATO TAKES OFFENCE AT THE REST OF US BEING CALLED "GOLDEN RETRIEVERS"

Jeff McIntyre of the Grand Valley Construction Association really is a horse's patootie. What was he thinking when he referenced his like for Non Disclosure Agreements because he's on the inside while the rest of us are golden retrievers waiting by the door for news. No politician worth his salt would make such a stupid comment but then maybe Mr. McIntyre is a much better human being than most politicians (granted a low standard) . Maybe he's at exactly where he should be but really he should be a tad more careful in his public choice of words.

Ms. D'Amato makes a very strong case for the public being in the loop and immediately apprised of new facts or plans whether good or bad. She also bluntly puts the committee members/working group of councillors, developers and builders in their place when she advises that "We, the public, are the owners, not the companion animals. We will decide what happens to the water, and who gets elected in the fall."

I've been warning Woolwich councillors for some time now that their futures, their reputations and legacies are at risk regarding the Elmira water crisis. Perhaps we will have a regional housecleaning first over the regional water crisis and the Woolwich one four years later after the mandated 2026 failure and fallout occurs. Who knows though. It could be a doubleheader this fall during the 2026 elections.     

CHURCH'S HOUSING DEVELOPMENT VERSUS GRAVEL PITS: WHO SHOULD GET THE WATER?

 

One article in today's K-W Record (front page) written by Bill Jackson discusses the refusal to give the former Trinity United Church in Elmira a building permit and the other on page 3. by Bill Doucet is an article in which local M.P.P. Aislinn Clancy is asking the Ontario Minister of Environment to stop issuing industrial and commercial water taking permits. In particular she is not happy with local gravel pits putting in applications for large water taking permits. 

For me this is an easy choice. We've got more gravel pits than we need and more pits are simply to reduce distance and costs to transport aggregate to building sites, cement and asphalt facilities. In other words to boost aggregate producers profits which isn't necessarily on it's face a bad thing. I however vote in favour of  water permits going to the new housing being developed on the former Church property on Arthur St. in Elmira.

Now here's a twist.  Elmira supposedly is legally mandated to have our Uniroyal Chemical contaminated ground water rehabilitated and restored by 2028.  If that were to occur (it won't) then I dare say that Woolwich could have pretty much gone ahead with OUR water and given the new housing development the building permit they require for construction this summer. Maybe a little more support and citizen involvement over the years/decades would have lit a fire under all the guilty/recalcitrant local buggers including politicians who have gone along deferentially with the go through the motions status quo for so long.

TRAC MEETING OF FEBRUARY !9, 2026

 

First of all I'm late posting this because of human error at the Township. A staff person simply forgot to put the link to their You Tube video on the Township's website (look for "Council Calendar") after uploading the meeting to You Tube . That said I'm going to grudgingly, unhappily and with an overall lack of grace thank a Woolwich councillor whom I have many times in the past sharply criticized environmentally.  Nathan Cadeau when informed by me promptly fixed the matter. Thank you Nathan.

Hmm O.K. that wasn't as painful as I thought it would be. Maybe that's because I view my environmental criticism as factual but not personal. We were advised by Lanxess (Hadley) about the results of some bench scale remediation testing. Now I believe she was talking about aerobic (with oxygen) and anaerobic (without oxygen) use of either bacteria or possibly amendments to soils that hopefully stimulate the bacteria to degrade NDMA and or chlorobenzene. The aerobic degradation was much better than the anaerobic degradation for chlorobenzene. For NDMA however the degradation both ways was much less than that for chlorobenzene. This testing will continue halfway through 2026.

Public consultation was discussed for the upcoming 2028 instrument whatever it's name such as Control Order or Certificate of Approval etc.  This of course is the new instrument post the mandated (but failed) groundwater cleanup deadline of 2028. A rose by any other name smells as sweet and another pile of horse manure from the MECP (Min. of Environment) will be equally as useless as all the rest. 

Mayor Shantz suggested that the current Waterloo Region water quantity crisis may be conflated with Elmira's water quality crisis involving NDMA, chlorobenzene, dioxins and so much more. Personally I believe that the two crises are interconnected. If she and the other guilty parties had done their jobs one or two decades ago our aquifers could have been in much better shape by now. She also would like to know if there is a better place to discharge the treated groundwater under Elmira to other than the Canagagigue Creek. Look out folks still contaminated water is looking for a home near you.

Hadley Stamm (Lanxess) made a reasonably dumb statement when she suggested that the treated groundwater being discharged to the Creek was at drinking water standards. Well Lou Almeida (GHD) swooped in and rescued her from that . Clearly Lanxess are more about PR and appearances as Hadley is the point person constantly interrupting and talking over Lou. Lou is a middle aged male of average appearance who has a ton of local Elmira experience versus Hadley's five minutes or so. One of these days Lou just might snap and non affectionately tell Hadley to "Shut the *#ck up !" Hope springs eternal.

Karl Belan of the Region of Waterloo made it clear that the Region were not interested in further treating discharged ground water to bring it up to drinking water standards. There was also discussion about the stigma of drinking former Uniroyal chemically contaminated water. 

I was pleased to see that TRAC are flexible enough to shift gears somewhat in mid stream and discuss the current Waterloo Region alleged quantity crisis. I say alleged because although not yet fully proven it sure looks like we are in water supply (quantity) trouble plus quantity IS related to quality. When you have a number of wellfields shut down due to contamination as we do then certainly water quality is affecting quantity. Well E10 at the south end of Elmira is being looked at although I find it odd that the well shed or housing has been removed. Yes the pipe is sticking out of the ground there but why expose it unnecessarily? Also I have heard recently that the Region are looking elsewhere near Elmira for more water.  Well that should be interesting as we see them attempt to pump uncontaminated water from the same aquifer(s). In fact buddy (?) Nathan Cadeau actually suggested that the Region could drill somewhere else in the aquifer and have clean water. Well, well, well.

Hadley got into an interesting conversation with Karl (Region) when she appeared to say simultaneously that the Region Do/Don't intentionally pump drinking water from contaminated aquifers elsewhere than Elmira.  Maybe Lanxess would care to clean up the treated groundwater further for use as drinking water??? Eric Hodgins (former Region hydroG) maybe pointedly commented that the Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act does have provisions for fines and jail for violators. Hmm.

There was much discussion about a survey from Lanxess to determine local interest in these issues. Frankly I think that all Lanxess want to do is quietly get the heck out of the aquifer remediation business as soon as possible and that means keeping everything on the downlow. 

I am seeing which way the wind is blowing and it's all about winding this thing up gracefully and looking good spending the least amount of money possible. Thank you Region of Waterloo for putting water back in the spotlight. 

RESIDENTS & CITIZENS SPEAK TRUTH, M.P.P. MIKE HARRIS LIES & BSs FOR HIS POLITICAL MASTER

 

I must say that it is a pleasure reading almost every day about the Region of Waterloo's incompetence and negligence regarding our mutual water systems.  Today I will be mentioning the hot air and absolute stupid comments from M.P.P. Mike Harris regarding the Region's water crisis as well as more first hand evidence from rural citizens living on the west side of Kitchener whom I may carefully compare to frogs in a pot of slowly, increasingly hotter water. No offence is meant by this metaphor. 

Mike Harris Jr. Jr.'s comments are published in great detail in this week's Woolwich Observer newspaper. The residents and citizens knowledge has been passed on to the public both in today's K-W Record by Terry Pender and in previous days and is straightforward and clear. Some of Mr. Harris Jr. Jr.'s asinine comments include "These infrastructure challenges are not a reason for critical infrastructure builds or housing projects to stall,". He also suggested that "  We expect the Region to continue to provide clear updates on how additional capacity will be delivered and timelines for when it is brought online." Clearly Mr. Harris Jr. Jr. isn't worried about how much water is left in our aquifers. Maybe he will reassure us by stating that God is a Progressive Conservative who would never let our aquifers run dry.

Two longtime local residents of Wilmot Township have spoken of their personal experiences with the falling water table for decades. This has included sinking multiple new wells and going deeper for the water that they need. The Waterloo Moraine is an incredible resource and it certainly appears that it has been abused and taken for granted by our authorities. 

There are two options. Firstly serious investigation into the groundwater levels throughout the Waterloo Moraine. Maybe the data is already available. Secondly if the water levels are better than expected and that we've been led to believe, then  I would question what was the motive for this scare, this alleged crisis.  Are our provincial and regional authorities so corrupt that they would attempt to manufacture a crisis in order to promote a multi billion dollar pipeline from Lake Erie to here? Somebodies will make millions of dollars profits on any such pipeline that we the taxpayers will pay for. 

So if there is a legitimate water supply crisis than our regional councillors (and some staff ?) need to get the boot and quickly for incompetence and negligence. If the crisis is a fake then some of the above along with provincial politicians need some long term rest and relaxation in a provincial institution (i.e. jail).

    

WHO'S LYING: STAFF, REGIONAL COUNCILLORS OR BOTH?

 

Well, well, well the mud is starting to fly. Today's K-W Record has a story by Terry Pender titled "Regional councillor wants probe into water crisis".  Reporter Luisa D'Amato apparently also attended last Wednesday's Waterloo Region council meeting and spoke about it in her Opinion piece titled "For some of us, the water crisis has already arrived". The good news is that both reporters picked up on the same strange occurrences at that council meeting.

The biggest and baddest is the announcement that both the public and regional councillors have been misled factually regarding water taking from Wilmot Township.  I was aware of the 1980 agreement between the Region and Wilmot Township that the township's water would not be unilaterally diverted by the Region towards other parts of the Region in particular to the tri cities. That appeared to be changed when the mayor of Wilmot, Ms. Salonen recently gave agreement in principle for the Region to take 30 litres per second from her township for use in the water short areas of K-W and Woolwich. That agreement appears to need to be ratified by her council (Wilmot) as well. Last Wednesday's regional council meeting had a major revelation. In fact the Region indeed did divert Wilmot water to the cities six or seven years ago and it's been ongoing! Nicely done Region of Waterloo. You've now admitted to lying to the public, Wilmot Township and presumably to most of your own regional councillors. WOW !!!

That betrayal and worse will take decades to live down if ever. Meanwhile councillor Doug Craig wants an independent probe into the causes of the water supply crisis. He's not the only one but skeptic that I am I have to ask is this for real or simple politics? Mr. Craig has also appropriately condemned the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs). What I am left wondering and unclear from both these articles is whether regional staff actually were going to divert and pump an additional 30 litres per second to K-W and Woolwich or were they simply gilding the lily about the diversion they did back in 2019 ?

One other major point. To date I have only seen reporter Luisa D'Amato twice reference wells being taken offline due to contamination.  That is a huge element to the alleged Quantity only (i.e. Supply) problems in our water systems.  Do not most reasonable people understand that shut down wells due to industrial contamination in Elmira and Kitchener affect the Supply of water available? Then there is the reality that there are also operating wells in both Waterloo and Cambridge with toxic trichloroethylene (TCE) in them that are still operating thanks to dilution and mixing with the rest of the water supply. Can that go on forever? 

Whether self-serving or not Doug Craig's asking the right questions as did councillor Joe Gowing recently. Councillor Huinink just got added to my regular e-mail list due to her published skepticism about agreeing to allocating water for growth at this time. Meanwhile Melissa Durell, Mr. Puopolo and other self-serving developers and builders can go suck on a raw egg at least until both the public and the Region really know where we stand on water supply.  

NDAs TO HIDE WORKING GROUP DISCUSSIONS ABOUT PUTTING CONTAMINATED WELLS BACK INTO OUR DRINKING WATER SYSTEM

 

DISCRIMINATORY NOT TO INCLUDE ELMIRA'S NDMA WATER INTO THE MIX

If Kitchener and Cambridge are allowed to put their trichloroethylene (and more) contaminated water into the big regional Integrated Urban System (IUS) drinking water pot then why not Elmira as well? Lanxess Canada have been moaning and groaning for the last couple of years about wastefulness as they dump somewhat treated groundwater into the Canagagigue Creek. If the Region are seriously planning on using retread wells (Woolner, Pompeii, Greenbrook & Parkway Wellfields)  with long histories of contamination then how dare you discriminate against our fine, Mennonite, contaminated water. Is our chlorobenzene, NDMA and maybe even dioxin contaminated water not good enough for you? Who knows, the state of knowledge whether toxicity or health related is so limited that maybe the various contaminants might cancel each other out.

I see two possibilities here. We could develop a two tier water system whereby our politicians, developers, builders and real estate folks are serviced from the industrially uncontaminated wells and the rest of us can drink from the leftover, retreaded and refurbished chemically enhanced wells. Hmm maybe we might want to include doctors, hospital staff and  police in the favoured status, unenhanced wells. Certainly we shouldn't charge the unsophisticated masses a premium for the extra additives that they will receive.

The other plan is to begin deporting older, useless retired citizens like me who are no longer contributing to the general good. Now by "deporting" I only mean to kick them out of Waterloo Region in order to make room for all the vibrant, hard working newcomers that Doug Ford and the Region are set on.  Just think of the advantages. Bringing in an additional 300,000 people by 2051 is a piece of cake if no upgrades are needed to our wastewater treatment systems (sewage treatment plants), our hospitals and health care and our drinking water systems. Furthermore if you squeeze your eyes, just so, you can see that we might actually be increasing the lifespans of our older, more health challenged citizens by not making them drink our NDMA, dioxin, chlorobenzene, trichloroethylene, benzene etc. mostly low level contaminated water. Talk about a Win-Win !

Non Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) are not everybodies cup of tea. There will be shouts of hooliganism, lying, non-transparency and non-accountability but that happens every time when elites (smarter/richer)  focus on who really matters which is them not us. For progress to happen you can't let the majority (non elite masses) run the show and it is so much easier to control them by keeping them in the dark. Hence the huge advantages to NDAs keeping difficult information from the uninformed public who wouldn't understand it anyways.  Or as Jeff MacIntyre (builder) stated in today's Record article titled "Region pushes NDAs for water talks";  he likes NDAs because he doesn't want to sit by the door like a Golden Retriever (the public) waiting for a report. Right on Mr. MacIntyre !

P.S. Just because Elmira water isn't good enough for us right now doesn't mean it's not good enough if a little diluted for the rest of the Region of Waterloo. Afterall wouldn't you drink a really fine wine from a jug just because someone peed in it the night before, emptied it and then filled it with a vintage beverage for you?   

THANK YOU TERRY PENDER, JIM POLING, BRENT JOLLY FOR YOUR CORRECTION IN TODAY'S K-W RECORD

 

Gosh that wasn't so difficult now was it? Your CORRECTION on page A2 with the title "Re: Councillor wants halt on new water-taking permits in Waterloo Region" was clear and concise. I certainly didn't need any thanks or applause or public adulation for doing what I've been doing here in Dogpatch (Elmira) for the last 36 years plus. My volunteer work has always been in the public interest and yes besides environmental failures that also includes picking up on mathematical failures that have gotten by reporters and editors. Based upon Record Editor Jim Poling and National Media Council Brent Jolly's pathetic mishandling of my polite and courteous request for a Correction/Retraction on the Lanxess Canada/Elmira Water Crisis story in late November 2025 written by Terry Pender; I decided this time to be a hard a*s about it. Instead of approaching initially only Terry Pender and Jim Poling and later Brent Jolly as I did last November, this time I sent out my Blog posting immediately to Woolwich Council, Waterloo Region Council, TRAC, MECP,  Lanxess, Woolwich Observer, and the K-W Record plus maybe a few more. Gosh I wonder how pissed all your developer friends were when they figured out that the Record instead of downplaying or minimizing the crisis you were actually (unintentionally probably) artificially increasing it with your sloppy mathematics. Now after that slap to the back of your heads just let me say this: WELL DONE! Your series on the Region's water crisis has been terrific so far. I am however still wondering when you are going to publish the truth about the retread wells the Region want to put back in service in order to supplement the volume of our water supply.

Today's Record article titled "Third-generation Wilmot resident has witnessed the water table drop" certainly casts doubt upon the demands and claims of developers and builders suggesting that this Region wide water crisis is an engineering problem only. I have no doubt that our friends at the University of Waterloo who have been studying groundwater recharge, discharge and elevations for decades have a good idea whether or not putting more straws into the communal milkshake will continue to lower the water levels to dangerous levels or not. Personally until I see peer accepted, proven and verified data on the Waterloo Moraine Aquifers in particular, I am very skeptical that those who have personally made tons of money through development and building are speaking for the public interest.  

K-W Record I applaud your Correction in today's newspaper. I really don't believe that your readers will hold it against Mr. Pender that he made an honest mistake. I expect that they, like myself, will be more impressed that the Record quickly acknowledged and corrected that mistake.  

      

SPEAKING TO THE INTENTIONALLY DEAF, BLIND & STUPID: i.e. PROVINCIAL, REGIONAL, & MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES

 

Clearly conflicts of interest are front and centre. All the above groups have been offered incentives not to be reasonable, responsive and honest in their dealings with myself and others still advocating for a proper cleanup of the downstream Canagagigue Creek, the former Uniroyal Chemical site and the Elmira Aquifers. These incentives may very well be worded as benefits to the local community that would otherwise not be forthcoming. Of course citizens and residents have never been invited to comment on this possible tradeoff. For example would you undermine your physical health in exchange for a tiny bit more financial security? Some might, some might not but none of us have been given that choice thanks to our non-transparent and non-accountable politicians.

So why do I continue? Simple. One most of them are not well informed and feel they have no need to be . Their direction and decisions have already been made for them and it's easier and safer not to rock the boat. So they need to be informed whether or not they act upon that knowledge. Secondly I'm producing documentation that in the future will condemn at least some of the worst offenders. All of them will scuttle like rats when the whole scam collapses. Whether it's slowly or with a bang they will be looking for cover and for excuses. The more written documentation and facts that they clearly have received the more difficult that will be. That is why I continue. The future (& present) need to know the truth and our elected representatives are not providing it.

THE PRICE OF WHISTLEBLOWING

 

Polluters don't like you.  Ministry of Environment doesn't like you. Municipal councils don't like you. Regional councils don't like you. Co-opted citizens don't like you. Fellow travellors of polluters don't like you. You get blacklisted from local jobs especially in a place like Elmira. You are discriminated against even by local groups desperate for volunteer assistance. Slander and bad mouthing occur behind your back. Others take credit for your volunteer work that you have done. Negativity and skepticism need special care and attention. Trust in strangers diminishes in direct proportion to the manipulative liars you meet, confront, console or get stabbed in the back by. 

The plus side of whistleblowing: You develop one hell of a sense of humour. You learn dozens of euphemisms for the word "liars". Irony and hypocrisy become much clearer. You see the humour in everything. Double entendres, synonyms, puns all leap out at you. Your newly found wicked sense of humour is coiled and ready to spring at any opportunity. Eventually both your lie and liar detection skills do improve. You begin to understand people's weaknesses and why they do what they do. You learn the various shades of good, bad, evil and sociopathic. 

Despite everything: Hope Springs Eternal

WELL DONE JOE GOWING DESPITE THE K-W RECORD LOOKING LIKE IDIOTS

 

Oh my God but it's so sad , so pathetic and so incredibly funny all at the same time. First of all I will be sending at least a few of my recent Blog postings to regional councillor Joe Gowing not because his saying one good thing is going to convince this political skeptic that he's an honest man but because it's the first intelligent thing I've heard so far from any regional councillor. Go suck a lemon Barry Vrbanovic. I will also of course be sending this one to the usual guilty parties but also to Brent Jolly of mediacouncil.ca. He's the twit who apparently decided that reporter Terry Pender shouldn't have to make corrections and or retractions after writing his story last November about Lanxess Canada and the failure of the groundwater cleanup here in Elmira, Ontario.

So why am I laughing so hard? Well when you in writing advise a newspaper (Waterloo Region Record) that their reporter (Mr. Pender) has written and had published a story with multiple inaccuracies in it and neither that newspaper nor the governing body for newspapers' accuracy (National Media Council) make even the slightest attempt to learn about, clarify or rectify those errors; and then the same reporter shortly afterwards makes some incredibly blatant (and public) errors in another story; well you just have to break out with the belly laughs.

So what did the divine Mr. Pender do this time? More importantly will the K-W Record actually publish the corrections or retractions? Should I really rub their noses in it here and now or should I wait for the corrections/retractions to appear. Or not. The thing is it's really not a bad article overall. It's title in today's Record is "Councillor wants to halt permits for gravel pit to draw groundwater". It's just unfortunate that the nasty and guilty parties will likely exert even more pressure on the Record to do their bidding. Bidding such as no longer publishing quotes from me for example. Bidding such as intentionally undermining knowledgeable citizens credibility when they are told to do so. Sorry K-W Record but you've been asking for this for a very long time. Just like the Woolwich Observer in Elmira I've tried very hard to be friends but you've behaved like ass*oles and clearly I'm fed up with you.

I'll give readers a very strong push in the right direction here. Do the math. Yes Terry Pender, Joe Gowing etc. are correct in that it is asinine to continue issuing new Water Taking Permits for industry, gravel pits and golf course until we know that we've absolutely got enough water to cover current  permits plus commercial and residential needs. That said however Mr. Pender is undermining his story by pretty egregious and blatant mathematics failures. For example is 9.7 million litres per day, ten times greater than Toyota's water useage at 24 litres per second? I don't think so.  Also is the 9.7 million litres a day water taking actually the same as 240 litres per second that he claims? Again I don't think so. Do the math folks. Apparently it's hard for both politicians and reporters to do math and certainly the former doesn't surprise me at all. Just look at M.P.P. Mike Harris Jr. Jr.. We all know that there are no qualifications required to be a parent (in his case five times) and we know the very same is true for politicians. That makes him a double winner. Newspapers' mathematical failures do surprise me somewhat.  I'm more interested in their integrity however. Will they publish a correction or retraction???

DEVELOPERS ARROGANCE ON DISPLAY? OR IS IT SOMETHING ELSE?

 Well I can see now why the Record didn't want to have reporter Terry Pender admit to a number of inaccuracies in his Lanxess/Elmira story back in late November. He'd already been tapped for this series on water issues in our Region and they didn't want even the tiniest blemish on his credibility. That is ironic to me because I never believed that Mr. Pender had made up his "facts" but that simply he'd been bullsh**ted to by Lanxess and other story tellers. 

Today's article by Mr. Pender is titled "Development should not be slowed by region's water shortage, MPP says". The MPP is our very own idiot Mike Harris Jr. Jr., the very same fellow who had five kids before he decided to research birth control. Apparently he thought it was generally like immunization and that there was a "herd immunity" element involved. You know one has to wonder about an out of town fellow who gets parachuted into a riding where the incumbent has the same name as him. Of course his Daddy and colleagues booted our Mike Harris out of his political seat to make room for Mike Harris Jr.Jr.

So Mike Harris Jr.Jr. feels that a water shortage should not delay growth and development. Wonderful then let him and his progeny go sit in the light, licking their lips pleading to have their water turned back on. Come on Mikey show us the way. Also Joseph Puopolo executive officer with Polocorp Inc. (development co.) stating that "Temporary infrastructure constraints should not be used as a justification to stall development.".  Really and when did Mr. Puopolo get his credentials in hydrogeology? How does he know it's a temporary shortage versus a long term result of mining too much water from the Waterloo Moraine?

Furthermore Mr. Puopolo has the audacity to suggest that the 20 per cent resiliency factor in the water system is unnecessary? Again he knows this how exactly? Common sense says otherwise.

Then we have the idiot Region of Waterloo forming a working group with developers to increase the supply of water to the system. Hmm odd that the Region didn't form a working group with the Food Bank to increase the supply of food to the needy. Or how about a working group with our local drug addicts to enhance the supply perhaps of safer drugs to decrease overdose deaths? And on and on. What makes the developers so special?  Ahh money $$$ and $$$ political $$$donations $$$perhaps? 

Maybe developers are not exactly arrogant.  They are simply puppet masters and which regional councillors are their puppets do you think? Is it even possible that recent job leavings in the Region's Water departments reflect a tiny, internal revolt by honest and concerned employees? Could professionally credentialed water managers have had enough of the glib, elected political twits always demanding full steam ahead on development and growth and damn the torpedoes? Could a few inside, honest individuals have decided that maybe one torpedo is desperately needed and they've fired it to shake up the entrenched, pro growth mantra making a few immensely wealthy at the expense of the many? 

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? NO OFFICIAL RESPONSE TO RETREADED, CONTAMINATED DRINKING WELLS BEING PUT BACK IN SERVICE?

 

I thought that our authorities couldn't go much lower than ignoring dioxins flowing into the Martin swimming pond used by local Mennonite children for decades here in Elmira.  I was wrong. Based upon last Saturday's K-W Record story written by Luisa D'Amato titled "Will we have enough water?" it appears that they indeed can go lower. In order to keep the money/gravy train running for developers and builders the Region of Waterloo are suggesting dishonestly refurbishing and retreading long closed contaminated wells to put them back into service. Perhaps they will dilute them when possible in order to keep them under some theoretical (but intrinsically inaccurate) concentration protecting human health and maybe they won't especially when supplies are low. I stated that it was a "dishonest" refurbishment because the public have never been clearly advised as to the sources and toxic contents in that groundwater in the first place.

Today's Record carries new information from reporter Terry Pender in an article titled "Gravel pits seek water-taking permits in midst of crisis". Wow clearly both our regional councillors as well as our other authorities (MECP for example) have no shame. Recently the Region have approved a 30 litre per second withdrawal of water from Wilmot Township to be put into the Kitchener, Waterloo and area water systems. Now Esbaugh Sand & Gravel want to remove 9.7 million litres of pristine groundwater per day for use in the new Hallman gravel pit. Do you think they are going to be returning 9.7 million litres per day of pristine groundwater to the deeper aquifers or are they going to be returning dirty groundwater that has been used to wash debris, organic matter, leaves, surface and shallow bacteria, dust etc. from the stones that they have removed and crushed from near surface? The sand and gravel above those aquifers fifty to ninety feet below ground filtered out contaminants and has securely stored that water for decades and longer.

Ms. D'Amato's article from last Saturday briefly mentions that one of the three Parkway wells near Fairway Rd. and Manitou Dr. is contaminated. She did not mention highly toxic trichloroethylene (TCE) or that all three wells have been closed for good reason. These wells are close enough together that whichever one is pumping will very quickly draw the TCE plume towards it . That plume is already within the cone of influence of all three wells.  Secondly Ms. D'Amato did not mention long standing problems with the Greenbrook wells drawing contaminated water from under the Ottawa St. Landfill towards themselves. Avid newspaper readers may recall the Regional scandal involving their landfill sites illegally taking liquid toxic wastes from Varnicolor Chemical and other local polluters back in the early 1990s. Perhaps the human error several years ago at the Greenbrook Wellfield in which a driver discharged ammonia into the wrong tank (chlorine) causing an explosion was the excuse they needed to shut those wells down for a long rest. Finally what I suspect may by far be the worst of the lot is the Woolner/Pompeii Wellfields. There are literally dozens of hydrogeological reports from the 1960s, 70s, 80s and 90s showing groundwater contamination naturally flowing downgradient from the back of Safety-Kleen (formerly Breslube) towards the aquifer's discharge point into the Grand River. The fact that the City of Kitchener and the Region had drinking wells known as "river wells" beside the Grand River only exacerbated the speed at which the contaminants flowed from upstream areas such as the "Black Lagoon" (between Breslube and the Grand R.). towards the Grand.

I dare local councils including Regional to continue ignoring these facts. You idiots are headed towards a future involving courts and all the money in the world will not wash the stink off of you.

TODAY'S RECORD ARTICLE ("SLEEPING GIANT") WAS INFORMATIVE & EDUCATIONAL ALBEIT WITH VERY LITTLE NEW INFORMATION

 

Two things did pop out at me though. The repeated claim that the two disinfection systems aren't mixed together because they produce stinky/smelly water and secondly the claim that the Bedrock Aquifer below the Waterloo Moraine contains too much sulphur and manganese whereas the Bedrock Aquifer below Cambridge is fine for potable water. Now I have gone and checked and indeed they are two distinct Bedrock formations and both have Dolostone in them. Now I have often heard that Bedrock Aquifer water isn't as aesthetically pleasing as Overburden water from sand and gravels. Bedrock Aquifers certainly have been noted as having a sulphur smell to them. But why is one fine and the other not?

Again regarding the two disinfection systems I would like more than the bald claim that the water from them together produces smells. I would also like to see a confirmation that indeed the two disinfection systems are chlorine versus chloramines. My understanding is that both disinfection systems produce chlorine smells which everybody knows and nobody likes.

To date no response to my Saturday posting here advising of the various groundwater wells affected by industrial contamination in Waterloo Region. This includes nothing from Woolwich Council, Waterloo Regional Council, TRAC, MECP (Environment Ministry), Lanxess Canada, K-W Record and the Woolwich Observer. In other words currently neither the media, the Ontario Ministry of Environment, three levels of government (2 councils & 1 provincial ministry), the corporation currently responsible for restoring the Elmira Aquifers (Lanxess) and finally the Woolwich Council appointed citizens committee (TRAC) have responded with either requests for further data or with questions. 

Here in Ontario and Woolwich Township that means public engagement and public consultation actually are more about avoiding public consultation with informed and determined citizens than otherwise. It means promoting conversation with folks deferential to authority but avoiding at all costs public discussions with those who ask either difficult or embarrassing questions. I would further suggest that the more informed and difficult questioners are defamed, backstabbed and discriminated against by our elected authorities.   

  

WATER NEWS: FEAR OF PRIVATIZATION & $100 MILLION RESERVE FUND UNTOUCHED WITH REPAIRS & REBUILDS SITTING IDLE

 

Terry Pender of the K-W Record has a front page article titled "Water crisis sparks fears of privatization" and Luisa D'Amato has an Opinion piece titled "A truce is reached in the water crisis, but the hard work is ahead". Regarding the privatization fears I suggest that the Region likely through their councillors have played directly into Doug Ford and the Conservatives hands. Apparently Bill 60 is the culprit as the provincial Conservative government passed it last year which among other things permits the sale of municipality's water infrastructure to private corporations. Politicians such as our own Sandy Shantz used the Min. of Environment's and Chemtura's boycott of CPAC back in late 2014 as an excuse to dump citizen volunteers on CPAC despite it being the intransigence and dishonesty of the other two parties impeding cleanup progress. Now the Region have handed the provincial government the excuse they need on a platter. Clearly the Region of Waterloo are incompetent as they have allowed our water system to deteriorate so badly.

Luisa D'Amato's Opinion piece is a little different. She states that a truce has been reached between developers, builders and the Region of Waterloo. Not so fast Luisa. I view your "truce" as more of a capitulation. What do you think brought on this water crisis in the first place? Clearly regional councillors are all ears when developers and friends come calling but deaf and blind when environmentalists and activists (i.e. citizens)  appear as Delegates requesting either slower growth or better infrastructure such as water treatment, sewage treatment, better remediation of contaminated sites etc. 

I will say that I do agree with Ms. D'Amato in regards to hard work being needed as well as answers to questions being required such as why was this water crisis such a surprise to so many.

HOO BOY ARE WE (RMOW) IN BIG WATER TROUBLE! DEVELOPERS, BUILDERS & POSSIBLY EVEN REPORTERS SIMPLY HAVE NO IDEA

 

I've been following all the articles, opinion pieces and Letters To The Editor carefully. Overall K-W Record reporters are doing a great job bringing the facts as they know them to the public's attention. The trouble is that the Region have been much less than forthcoming for many decades now hence neither the public, the developers, builders, politicians or the media truly understand the mess we are in. The bottom line is that having read Luisa D'Amato's TWO page article titled "Will we have enough water ?" the answer is an unequivocal no. Luisa among other things advises readers about the steps to increase our water supply both immediately plus over the next four or five years and I find that terrifying.

Why is it terrifying? It is terrifying because the Region clearly are desperate to avoid litigation from developers and builders who have sunk large amounts of time and money into proposed new developments whether they be detached homes, townhouses, condominiums or office buildings. How desperate you ask? They are so desperate they are pardon the pun "Going back to the well" in order to increase their water supply. Some of these "wells" have been shut down for years and in some cases decades. Why were they shut down in the first place, you ask. Because they were CONTAMINATED. This includes trichloeoethylene (TCE) in the Parkway wells (Deilcraft), benzene in the Greenbrook Wellfield (courtesy of Ottawa St. Landfill), multiple solvents and industrial chemicals with PCBs floating in oil (LNAPL)  upgradient of the Woolner and Pompeii Wellfields along the Grand River (Breslube). Other problems with these river wells as they are called is odour issues that do not occur in groundwater wells located away from surface water. Speaking of surface water the Middleton Wellfield is in the south end of Cambridge right beside the Grand River. The wells however are screened in the Bedrock Aquifer and likely would be separate from the river water however they are not separate from the free phase (DNAPL) TCE in the fractured bedrock fissures and pores.

Also pumping more water from the Middleton Wellfield which supposedly can be then pumped uphill to Waterloo and Kitchener will likely draw out more dissolved TCE from the Bedrock Aquifers. As it is there is a special and very expensive TCE treatment system called AOP (Advanced Oxidation Process). The other allegedly still unresolved problem is the different bacterial disinfection system used at the Middleton Wellfield versus the Mannheim Service Area.  My guess is that we are talking a chlorine system versus a chloramine system.

Wilmot Township have been picked to supply water to the Mannheim Service Area almost immediately. That combined with the loss of recharge due to the 700 acre proposed industrial megasite should go over well with Wilmot residents and politicians. Gravel pits, industrial megasites, plus supplying water to K-W  should be a fairly explosive mixture for the Region.

So let's summarize. We (developers, builders, politicians) want one million people here by 2050. Do we also want more contaminated water being mixed with what clean water we have left to keep us at least technically below the Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS)? Are we so desperate for growth that we will continue to revive old, shut down contaminated wells to boost our water supply? Meanwhile our river water source (The Grand) will continue receiving increasingly larger loads of treated (hopefully) human sewage as we approach one million people. WHAT POSSIBLY COULD GO WRONG WITH THIS SCENARIO?

"HEADS SHOULD ROLL AT REGION FOR NOT PROTECTING WATER"

Not coincidentally the title of this posting is identical to the one in the K-W Record's Letters To The Editor today. That Letter is written by John Waylett on behalf of the Property Taxpayers Alliance. While Mr. Waylett takes umbrage with MPP Aislinn Clancy's recent article criticizing Premier Doug Ford's environmental missteps, I feel that there is room to agree with both of them.  Yes Doug and the provincial Conservative government have behaved towards the environment exactly as is to be expected by a Conservative government. In other words badly. 

At the same time clearly our regional government have been leading us down the garden path for many decades as they blithely swallowed the Federal and Provincial Growth mantra without conditions or proper preparation.  Did we learn nothing from the 30,000-40,000 influx of Indian students attending Conestoga College? The Region did not have enough housing, jobs, food banks, healthcare, sewage treatment or drinking water facilities to keep up to the demand. 

Mr. Waylett is also correct in that the Region need to disclose to taxpayers how we got into this latest crisis involving water supply. Remember this is after the influx of students has been dramatically reduced. Does anyone really believe the Grand River, as a depository of our many sewage treatment plants, is ever going  to be the same after we hit 1,000,000 people living and working here? I for one do not.

My last point is this. Ultimately regional senior planners and water managers will do as they are told by a multitude of uneducated and woefully ignorant "professional" politicians. The word "professional" does not refer to their academic or technical qualifications it refers to their abilities to fib, gild the lily and weasel out of accountability and responsibility. When in trouble they will hire more credentialed staff (to hide behind and ignore) and form more committees (citizens' preferably) to insulate themselves from crises and blame of their own making.

DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS WIN AT REGIONAL COUNCIL

 

Well I'd sure be keeping an eye on Barry Vrbanovic as well as all the other regional councillors who voted to ignore their own third party report which stated "..in 2023, 2024 and 2025, unsustainable levels of water was pumped from the Waterloo Moraine, lowering aquifer water levels faster than they can be replenished.." . This quote was read to them by Kevin Thomason vice-chair of the Grand River Environmental Network (GREN). Despite this regional council decided to earmark 50% of new water capacity to support future development.

Today's K-W Record carries the following article by Bill Jackson titled "Up to half of new water capacity to support future development".  Some interesting (for me)other points in the article include the name Amy Shaw. Oh boy unless I'm losing it that would be Amy Shaw former Ministry of Environment employee for many years. I can't say much bad about her other than her choice of employer although the name does not give me any confidence but maybe she got out of the M.O.E. for a solid reason such as they are all talk, hot air and deception. Kudos to Geoff Moroz of the Region (staff) who confirmed that the region has been producing (i.e. pumping) more water than it can sustainably take. 

Clearly both his and Kevin Thomason's words and knowledge were given little weight by our clearly pro growth, pro development regional council. Remember that folks when you turn on the tap at home and get nothing but a big "Truck You" echoing down the pipe.

UNDERMINING, LYING, CHARACTER ASSASSINATION AND FOR WHAT?

 

You know I have far more respect for the Ruby Weber's of the world with their right wing, pro business positions and opinions then I do for the local, former, psuedo environmentalist Elmira residents who have cut and run. This is because I think that Ruby is a true believer whereas the others are simply opportunists looking out for number one and if that means switching sides mid stream then so be it.. Ruby was a Woolwich Council member for many years and very sympathetic to Uniroyal Chemical. She never forgot that they provided local jobs and tax revenue despite the mess they've made environmentally. In fact if she were still involved herself with TRAC and the former TAG I expect that she would have expressed her horror at how Uniroyal's promises have turned out to be nothing but wind. I also got to know her through a couple of other local issues and was pleased with her common sense as well as of her ethics of fair play. Quite possibly her, what I view as right wing, pro business attitudes, may very well have been due to her husband Amsey who I understood to be a self-made man. A self-made man who was an astute businessman who did well for himself and family.  

It is that lack of ethics, decency and fair play which have appalled me in regards to Sylvia Berg, Susan Bryant and Pat Mclean. Their modus operandi is not to declare war on someone they view as a threat or a risk to their plans but to claim friendship and collegiality along with common interests. They do not want their intended victim to even see coming their assault of lies and deceptions all intended to lower that individual's status, standing and positions be they environmental or otherwise. It is my opinion based upon personal experience that there is no room in their lives to treat others as well as they've been treated. Their incredibly self-centered approach is to slowly undermine while pretending the opposite. It does not matter that the intended victim doesn't even know that they are in the cross- hairs of their sights. The victim does not have to be intentionally undermining goals and plans that he/she are totally unaware of. In fact if asked they would likely, honestly respond oh no those self-centred goals can not be their's. 

Further thoughts have come to mind. Susan Bryant did not like Bill Strauss at all. She claimed to me that his speaking and education were an embarrassment to Woolwich Township. On the other hand both Pat McLean and Sandy Shantz liked Bill Strauss because as mayor he worked with them on Council or perhaps Pat thought she was manipulating him as she attempted with others. At first Pat made her dislike of Sandy clear based on losing her council seat to her. Later they were best buddies as both Susan and Pat worked on Sandy's election campaigns. In the scheme of lying manipulators I would rate Susan as number one, Sylvia as number 2 and Pat as number three.  

It has been specific Woolwich Council members working mostly through Susan and Pat that have enabled Uniroyal and successors, in harmony with the Ontario Ministry of Environment, to give Woolwich residents a totally inadequate and unsuccessful cleanup of their groundwater, surface water and soils and sediments.

A CULTURE OF LYING & DISINFORMATION: CAN IT BE OVERCOME TO SOLVE WATER PROBLEMS?

 

Some politicians might even admit quietly that lying to the public is an art form. They might suggest that every lie requires a fallback position. That fallback position might be new information that the public generally don't have. It might be scapegoating another political party for "obstructing" your legislative agenda. It might be blaming a higher tier of government such as the provinces blaming Ottawa and the Federal government for environmental failures. When in great trouble relying on "acts of God",  weather emergencies, outside influences, immigrants, the radical left whatever is the hot button issue of the day helps. Unions and labour unrest used to be a great scapegoat for corporations and businesses to blame when their outdated  products or technologies were no longer competitive. All in all accepting responsibility and taking blame for mistakes and failures is not the preferred option.

So according to today's K-W Record the Region of Waterloo are planning on using another $15 million dollars of taxpayers money to bring in a type of "workaround" technology.  This technology is referred to as container filtration systems.  A quick on-line check shows that several companies sell prefabricated water treatment systems generally for smaller applications including mining camps, isolated small locations involving using surface water (creeks & rivers) versus wells and even industrial plants. Yes they do claim that they can properly treat river water which in the case of the Grand River includes high turbidity (murkiness), pathogens such as bacteria and viruses, heavy metals, industrial discharges (legal or otherwise), parasites from cattle including cryptosporidium and less than perfect treatment of human wastes.  Lets not forget nice things like dead fish and animals that end up in the river not to mention the odd human body found immersed.

These new units apparently can produce 25 litres per second of clean water hence you would need at least eight of them to up our water supply by a whole 200 litres per second.  Boy that's not very much and certainly tells me that this is simply a workaround or maybe even a bandaid approach. Now I did the math on a couple of commercial units and they claim a somewhat higher volume of water produced than 25 l/sec but maybe the Region are simply being conservative in their estimates. Regardless based upon this one article and half an hour of research I am a little underwhelmed. 

But then again our local developers and builders want results yesterday and maybe that's exactly what they are going to get. Remember no problem is so serious and so bad that rushed, panicked decision making can not make it worse. Are our regional politicians up to the challenge? Hey we all elected the buggars so we get what we deserve.