It is truly disgraceful. Between NDMA, DDT, Dioxin, Benzene, Trichloroethylene, Parathion, Lindane and so many other toxic chemicals, that health studies were never done. This was described by two commenters with at least a modicum of regret versus the utter joy and relief Uniroyal Chemical likely felt when they realized how successful their lobbying as well as public relations was going. However reporter Terry Pender puts it to them pretty darn well when he describes the number of governments, militaries and compensation boards who compensated workers, soldiers and civilians who became sick after exposure to Agent Orange. Apparently here in Dogpatch...oops Elmira I mean, human life and health are much less valuable.
Other errors in the Record article include the fact that Susan Bryant was not appointed to TRAC in 1991. TRAC has only been around since about 2023 and in my opinion stands for Terribly Respectful of All Crap or in the alternative Totally Rotten and Corrupt. I do feel that the second term is too harsh and the focus should be on how deferential they are to authority and how they won't say shi* when their mouths are full of it.
Then we get to the concentrations . Groundwater has been measured for the last 36 years here as parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb) or parts per trillion (ppt). Alternatively they can be measured in the same order as milligrams per litre or micrograms per litre or nanograms per litre. I suspect whatever measuring numbers the reporter has published are nonsensical but at the very least they should match with the measuring methodology that we've all learned here over the last one third of a century plus. The health standard for NDMA is 9 parts per trillion or 9 nanograms per liter. It can also be referred to as .009 parts per billion or .009 micrograms per liter.
There are not eleven extraction wells on the site overall but actually thirteen when you appropriately include the two in the Municipal aquifer on site. The eleven wells most likely are strictly low pumping volume wells for the Upper Aquifer (shallow i.e. water table). Lou Almeida's bulls*it about whatever is underneath the plant stays underneath the plant is either wishful thinking or bullsh*t as previously suggested.
Allegedly the Region of Waterloo have changed their position on the need for Elmira's water from just a few years ago when Eric Hodgins (RMOW hydrogeologist) advised RAC/TAG that the Region no longer were looking at Elmira water for drinking purposes.
NDMA did not develop "...in the aquifers from a mix of chemicals that leaked out of the plant." It developed in various liquid waste ponds yes from a mix of chemicals and from there was both airborne and it also percolated downwards into the aquifers. In 1979 Uniroyal Chemical were fully aware that they had high readings of NDMA in the air around their plant, a full decade before the Ministry of Environment allegedly decided to test for it in the south wellfield (E7, E9).
The ammonia that came from Nutrite (later Yara) wasn't publicly acknowledged for almost a decade after the start of the 1989 Elmira Water Crisis. Nutrite was literally next door (west side) to Uniroyal. The agreed deal between Uniroyal and the Ontario Ministry of Environment was that Uniroyal were the single, only source of contamination in the Elmira Aquifers. This helped the Ont. M.O.E. look better than admitting what is now acknowledged namely that there were at least two other sources namely Nutrite and VARNICOLOR CHEMICAL. Earlier this year at a TRAC meeting it was admitted that Varnicolor Chemical contributed five different chlorinated solvents to the Municipal Aquifers. That site is still currently under remediation and took THIRTY-SIX YEARS for the admission to surface.
Yet another falsehood with the claim that no contaminants were found in leeches held in cages in the Canagagigue Creek. Leeches more readily absorb chlorophenols and that is exactly what they absorbed from the Creek water for decades until well after the 1997 Upper Aquifer Containment System was implemented. It did significantly reduce chlorophenol discharges via groundwater into the Creek and only after many years were leeches considered no longer needed for testing in the Creek. By the way Hadley Stamm echoes the cry of the wounded corporate polluter when she sanctimoniously suggests that big excavators "...would be hugely destructive for the creek". Then either use small excavators or a different methodology.
Hadley Stamm also states that "Those signs are not warranted, and Woolwich put them up." First of all neither Hadley nor Nathan Cadeau (councillor) were anywhere near Elmira and the Water Crisis when that occurred. Secondly Nathan's claim that DDT and dioxins were lower in the fish than provincial criteria (Tissue Residue Guidelines) is a complete falsehood. They exceed for DDT, dioxins, mercury and PCBs. I've read that study and if Hadley and Nathan have then they are liars. Otherwise they have second hand advice which conveniently tells them what they want to hear.
More coming tomorrow. Reporter Terry Pender has focused his interviews on those who enjoy the corporate gravy train and want to be on the "winning" side versus being accurate and forthright. Despite this I applaud his efforts and the Record for stepping up. I also seriously suspect that at age 76 Susan Bryant is now having memory problems. This is not a moral or ethical criticism. Life can be a bitch for us older folks and we all have physical and or mental issues as we age.