I find it difficult not to throw up at TRAC meetings based upon the almost reverence given to opinions of bought and paid for client driven fibbers. It is also difficult to sit there and listen to the bought and paid for "experts" who don't know crap about the history of the site or the history of the errors and misstatements constantly being both repeated and new ones formulated.
The bottom of page 7 in the June 19/25 Minutes is an admission that creek banks at Uniroyal/Lanxess are still eroding dioxins and DDT into the Creek. Gosh doesn't that make Lanxess dirty polluters as well? They've been on site and in control for what seven years now?
Supposedly the shutdown of off site pumping (other than E7) is to determine the extent of "rebound" of contaminant concentrations after pumping ceases. So far the company are talking out of both sides of their mouths regarding secondary sources such as "back diffusion". First of all I'm tired of the dirty polluter being the one who defines any word whatsoever. Please truck off Lanxess. I suspect that Lanxess and the MECP simply want to reduce pumping even more and allow the former Uniroyal site to simply leak, ooze and dilute their toxic load by sharing it downstream, downgradient in the aquifers and finally into the atmosphere.
There will also be an alleged peer review of the Creek's Risk Assessment. Sure we were all born yesterday as this firm and consultant are colleagues/peers/co-conspirators? of Hadley Stamm (Lanxess) who is simply the female version of Nathan Cadeau.
Just a normal day at the office of disinformation and dysentery on behalf of Lanxess Canada.
No comments:
Post a Comment