Thursday, July 30, 2015

DOES THE CHEMTURA TRINITY = SANDY'S ELECTION EXPENSE FIASCO ?



1) Public smearing of Woolwich volunteers (CPAC) by Chemtura (& the M.O.E.)

2) Ongoing leakage of solvents, PAHs, Endosulfan, Dioxins, DDT & metabolites into the Canagagigue Creek

3) The Stroh Drain (east side) bypass to the creek including exposure route to children


1) Chemtura and the M.O.E. were under appropriate siege by the Chemtura Public Advisory Committee. Immediately upon taking office (within days) our new Mayor was on the attack criticizing CPAC at the October public CPAC meeting. She and Mark Bauman continued this relentless and untruthful assault upon Woolwich volunteers attacking their credibility, competence, integrity and even alleging physical intimidation and harassment of Chemtura and the M.O.E.. All this without a lick of honest evidence before them.

2) Ministry of Environment studies in 1995-96, 2012, 2013 prove discharges of Dioxins and DDT downstream of the company into the Canagagigue Creek. They (M.O.E.) so far have kept the completed results for 2014 hidden from CPAC. They are saving them for two committees (RAC & TAG) better suited to their polluting personalities and deceptive ways. RAC & TAG take over on September 1, 2015. CPAC's recent study and sampling (July 2015) indicates the other contaminants as well as DDT.

3) This is the smoking gun of intentional illegal dumping into the creek even after the 1989 Elmira water crisis. This manmade Drain circa 1985 runs parallel to Chemtura's eastern property border and within 20-25 metres of it. It takes ground and surface water from both the Stroh property and the Chemtura property and directs it into what was originally a natural spring that flows southwards past a manmade swimming pond and into the Canagagigue Creek. This pond is filled with both groundwater and the original natural springwater. The latter is via a pipe which contrary to Mark Bauman's claim that it only helps fills the pond via a sluice type structure when dammed; in fact gravity flows on its' own directly into the pond. This pond has been used by Mennonite children for decades.


Sandy Shantz's election has saved Chemtura Canada hundreds of millions of dollars in east side cleanup costs. It has saved the Ontario M.O.E. possibly a public inquiry into their negligence, corruption and collusion with Chemtura. Her election totally changed the channel that was all about a manmade offsite toxic liquid bypass that may include an Interceptor Trench capturing all Chemtura's east side toxic groundwater and diverting it east and south. Two professional reports have now condemned the Chemtura/M.O.E. actions and non-actions on their east side.

The RAC group consists of Sandy, likely Mark B., GRCA, Region and a paid by Chemtura Chair of TAG. TAG will include Sandy's campaign helper Pat McLean as well as Susan Bryant. Those two have for years personally benefited by their amicable association with Chemtura.

This entire revolution and rescue of Chemtura was totally dependant upon Sandy Shantz winning the election. Sandy was herself improperly rescued by the Region's MECAC (election compliance committee). They had but one duty and that was to order a full blown forensic audit of her election expenses. They illegally accepted her months late revised Financial Statement and two page "audit" instead on July 2/15.

Was there too much at stake here including regional and provincial politicians worried about public exposure for their October 7, 1991 "sweetheart" deal with Uniroyal Chemical (Chemtura) ? Too much at stake here that is to let this important election be left entirely up to the voters aka "unwashed masses"?

18 comments:

  1. As Sandy Shantz stated to KW Record
    http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4902248-sandy-shantz/ PRIOR to Election


    "We need to bring respect back into the Council chambers and into Township interactions with local businesses, volunteers and other levels of government. While we might not always agree, I will insist opposing opinions are heard and discussed with respect. "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, Sandy said whatever people wanted to hear until she walked into the Mayor's office. Jumped on the high horse and there you have it....a mess due to poor decisions and is only making last council (Bryant,Poppenroth, Herteis) show the great job they did. Todd was not great, but any volunteer could speak at council. Not only should Sandy's book keeping be questioned as so should her emails to volunteers and the whole Breslau School Fisaco and telling volunteers "shhh, don't say anything as we will shut out the associations to get the school and sell the land" and what councillors in ward 3 as they tell us in breslau go ahead come to council.
      Bresalu shows up at council and in return: ward 3 councilors Murray and Larry crush them saying" we don't remember that converstion!" Murray Martin has turned down every request from Park associations.

      Delete
  2. She's ascended since the election to No. 1 in my book. No. 1 hypocrite.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its really unfortunate that this blog has become a vendetta against the Mayor. She is a good person and was elected to deal with more than your special interests Mr. Marshall. Perhaps you can explain what value the taxpayers of the Township have received for your $22,000 boondoggle in the Courts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What does being a good person have to do with being a good Mayor. If she is not able to file a financial statement then what else can she not do?

      The Mayor by not filing correctly cost the taxpayers money.

      I hope that the Mayor is just not focused on this issue at the moment. There are far more pressing issues that we all need to focus on.

      We need leadership not excuses.

      Delete
    2. What about the money of appointing paid chair positions to new committees? Hello, where did that money come from and hello: if mayor Shantz would step up to the plate and had allowed her mecac audit then no cost at all ( would be milled to the complainant) soooo ask yourself: why didn't mayor shantz allow the audit? If she had nothing wrong then nothing to worry about. A legal complaint went to court due to Mayor Shantz's doing and out of Mr. Marshalls hands. A Mayor is not a political party and is the most direct position where immediate taxpayers have a say.

      Delete
  4. The 22K is peanuts compared to the wasteful spending and other special interest and pet project funding that goes on in Woolwich. What on earth is meant by Ms. Shantz is a good person? She can be as good as she wants, but from now on she and all the public servants and high paid staff must become good public servants. Good people (including Mr. Marshal) are not being vindictive, they are speaking their mind and It is a direct, honest and heartfelt reaction to the lies; that things in Woolwich will be improved... when they are just getting worst and worst! If you cannot handle the truth people then just keep on supporting the lip service that is being dished out, by your politicians. Do NOT blame Mr. Marshall (or me) for what the politicians and lawyers and consultants and special interests caused. If you really honestly like the way things are in Woolwich then go back to watching TV and get ready to cast your next meaningless vote. If you want me to shut up then how about YOU! pay my property and business taxes! We the people want value for our money and No more conflicts of interest and absolutely No more bullshi*!.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "what value the taxpayers of the Township have received for your $22,000 boondoggle in the Courts" Lets again look at the fact there is a staff member paid by OUR TAX's (Sunshine list I might add) who refuses to do their job costing the tax payers legal fees after legal fees. When will these people be held accountable? These are the same people who decided to spend how much in legal fees so they didn't have to make a decision about our former Mayor Cowan. Your anger should be towards the sunshine list not Mr Marshall

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please explain. How did this person not do their job? Did they not do their job or just not handle things the way that you wanted them to?

      Why is the Sunshine list a problem? Actually consult the list. Seriously, go online and read it. This is the typical salary for the jobs that these individuals do- this is across all townships. Doctors, lawyers, dentists - these guys make more than this ...you just don't know about their salaries because they are not reported to the public. How would you like it if I found out what you made for a living and complained that you earned too much? Unfortunately, when the "going rate" for a job is fairly well set across the board, you don't have the right to complain about it. The Sunshine List just provides fodder for those who simply don't understand the way the real world works.

      Delete
  6. As per Elmira Independent of April 8, 2015 article by Gail Martin

    'Seven members of Woolwich Township staff have made this year’s Sunshine List, earning more than $100,000 annually.

    The top earner was township CAO David Brenneman, who took in $143,939.77, earning approximately $30,000 more than his nearest colleagues.

    Four employees were tied at $111,222.75 — Dan Kennaley, director of engineering and planning; Karen Makela, director of recreation and facilities services; Richard Pedersen, fire chief; and Richard Petherick, township treasurer.

    Two more employees made this year’s list — Barry Baldasaro, the township’s engineering operations supervisors, who earned $104,787.36 in 2014, and Richard Sigurdson, manager of engineering, who took in $103,700.78."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And what, pray tell, does this have to do with anything?

      Delete
  7. I find it incredible (unbelievable) that Justice Broad did not understand Mr. Marshalls blunt statement pertaining directly to the handwritten March 23 2015 date in the so called audit document which the court had right in front of them in evidence...and on the other hand the Justice so clearly understood Ms. Shantz's "good faith" and used "discretionary power" to change the law. What kinda crap is this. As far as respect goes, the judge respected Mr. Marshall so much he denied him the truth. This does not make any sense either, except for those of us that already know for a fact that politicians and the media and lawyers and accountants and of course judges have the "discretionary" power to make past events happen a certain way by simply wishing and then willing it into existence. I was further revolted when Justice Broad called the mayorship "property". What a scam and a travesty of justice! Bias goes full circle with the big boys and girls. Only leaders are right even when they are wrong. Only leaders can lead the blind. 1+1=3 Up is down and down is up! Black is white and white is black or heck when they get in trouble there is no black or white, just shades of grey. Yup everything is sure under their control...Our leaders have proven that are very sick, how disgusting! However, as in the famous old story it is still the truth when the innocent child blurted out "the Emperor does not have any clothes on" The legal document dated March 23, 2015 from Ms. Shantz is fatal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. " I was further revolted when Justice Broad called the mayorship "property". What a scam and a travesty of justice! Bias goes full circle with the big boys and girls. Only leaders are right even when they are wrong. Only leaders can lead the blind. 1+1=3 Up is down and down is up! Black is white and white is black or heck when they get in trouble there is no black or white, just shades of grey. Yup everything is sure under their control...Our leaders have proven that are very sick, how disgusting! However, as in the famous old story it is still the truth when the innocent child blurted out "the Emperor does not have any clothes on"

    Are you for real? Add one more cliche statement to this to incite public anger.

    The people (lawyers, judges) dealing with the case have been provided with the facts and are confident in them. It's not one big conspiracy against you all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are clichés for a good reason young man and almost all the conspiring nowadays is based on evil motives and is damaging to many innocent and good people so I would have to say that IT is a big conspiracy against all that is good. Labels mean nothing when one can tell the difference between good and evil and simply sticks to the truth..

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. O.K. folks good comments at the beginning but slowly degenerating. If you have more on more recent postings have at it. We've beaten this posting to death without really focusing on the posting. More like a two way back and forth. But interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete